Signature Ban Appeal and Q&A : appeal your sigban here

[goldkingcoiner]

Nutildah you are going to need a separate thread to have a place to put all the complaints against dismissed sigban appeals. This thread is going to get flooded. In fact, it will get clustered by different people arguing different points... How are you planning on managing that?

Is this thread only for appealing a sig ban or can we request you to look into members we feel deserve a ban? If it's the former only, are you going to make another thread where users can request accounts be looked into or would that be too much drama in your opinion?

This seems like a good idea. But I think only appeals are the topic here.

[Xiestar]

~snip~
In our team, we actually have one person whose job is to review and rate posts from the perspective of someone who is not deeply involved in cryptos, blockchain or even in gambling.

This person is doing a very bad job considering that anyone who follows your campaign at all will confirm that it produces the most spam on the forum (especially in the Gambling board).

Stake participants improves dramatically ever since Igebotz step in to help them manage participants and improve rules.

You notice the difference on post quality specifically on gambling board post if you will just spend time comparing their post quality to other participants specifically Rollbit/Rainbet.

The only advantage and currently bias on this signature ban is merit count was heavily being considered while lots of merit whore that truly spam the forum with nonsense repetition of Bitcoin selling/buying post was not being affected. They frequently spam gambling board with fake gambling story and football discussion post which is same with Stake participants.

With this signature ban, you are just giving the merit whore farm more slot for signature campaign. This decision will back fire if merit will always being prioritized as criteria most importantly that there’s already proof that some merit source like Smartgold was involved on farming. 

[Lucius]

Stake participants improves dramatically ever since Igebotz step in to help them manage participants and improve rules.
~snip~

Without going into the merits in relation to Gambling boards, I disagree with you because so far most users from the Stake campaign have received a sig ban. If we look at the table created by @bangjoe and add the fresh bans from the modlog we come to the point that the following participants in the Stake campaign have been sig banned : @virasog, @Akbarkoe, @fuguebtc, @Danica22, @bitgolden, @Sithara007, @Fredomago.

I don't believe this is the final number, and I don't believe that none of those who pay them for their posts could see how "quality" they are in what they do.

[Rikafip]

Without going into the merits in relation to Gambling boards, I disagree with you because so far most users from the Stake campaign have received a sig ban.

That's because there is ongoing paid campaign against Stake (according to a certain Stake member). 

Sithara007

I’m glad to see this shitposter finally getting a signature campaign ban, albeit only for a couple of months. No one can convince me that there are actually people reviewing and rating his posts while still keeping him in the campaign, unless they have serious reading comprehension problems.