[LIST] Signature Ban List

[nutildah]

This has been happening for months now.  Ojengonggu (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1042116) was wearing the Rainbet signature and avatar too when he was necroposting (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5568749.msg66186599#msg66186599) back in December of 2025.  He has been banned since.  

If you find any other accounts like this, please let me know.

These 32 inactive accounts were first identified in this thread.

The idea is to send a message that account farming on this scale (or any scale really) will no longer be a profitable endeavor. People can still do it in the bounty section to their hearts content, I don't think anybody really cares what goes on in there.

In this particular case, the chance of there being a mix-up or misunderstanding is none. But I went through with the sigbans only after putting it up for discussion.

[LoyceV]

The idea is to send a message that account farming on this scale (or any scale really) will no longer be a profitable endeavor.

What's 2 years to an account farm that hasn't been used in 5.5 months?

[nutildah]

The idea is to send a message that account farming on this scale (or any scale really) will no longer be a profitable endeavor.

What's 2 years to an account farm that hasn't been used in 5.5 months?

Are you sure its not being used?

Its almost impossible to find a reputable source on Google about "passive SEO link saturation", but if you put that into duckduckgo or whatever you use you can probably glean what its all about.

[examplens]

The idea is to send a message that account farming on this scale (or any scale really) will no longer be a profitable endeavor.

What's 2 years to an account farm that hasn't been used in 5.5 months?

Are you sure its not being used?

Its almost impossible to find a reputable source on Google about "passive SEO link saturation", but if you put that into duckduckgo or whatever you use you can probably glean what its all about.

Such links have no special value in the long term. To have a positive impact on SEO, the page (profile page) where the link is posted would have to have some kind of views, and these are looks like archived.
But they can certainly help with new domains when search engines do the first indexing.

[nutildah]

Such links have no special value in the long term. To have a positive impact on SEO, the page (profile page) where the link is posted would have to have some kind of views, and these are looks like archived.
But they can certainly help with new domains when search engines do the first indexing.

I don't think that's entirely true. The mass count of links on the site contributes some SEO strength, although not as much as links in posts that have active impressions.