I'll start with this. Bitcoin is pseudonymous and not anonymous. Bitcoin doesn't reveal name. All it has is just your wallet address. Only when enough information is gathered can your name be linked to your wallet address.
Then you don't read to understand what the purpose of this thread was but want a means to get merit.
The purpose of this thread is to warn about the danger that the monitoring technology the government is working on will pose to Bitcoiners because if the camera around every Bitcoiner is monitored, then the safety of such a person is shaken, and your wallet linkage is not needed for a physical attack to happen.
Please, if you want to reply somebody try to make points based on knowledge for beginners instead of accusations. Let me explain what I posted and your own side of the post. The one I want to talk about first is your surveillance you talked about at the last. Your whole post is based on whether we Bitcoiners can easily be tracked.
Now if governments can track our devices more accurately, there's a risk to to Bitcoiners because it will make finding them more easily. But this is based on conditions. Follow me. Only surveillance can't compromise Bitcoin security. Bitcoin is pseudonymous and simply knowing where I am can't reveal my seed phrase, can it? You answer it. Physical surveillance only increases the possibility of attack. Can Bitcoin be broken because of that? No.
I also made mention in my first post that the more you give out of yourself to the internet, the more easier anyone can track you. Now, surveillance in the future will definitely become harder to avoid in the future. That is a fact. But we as individuals who reduce the amount of information we give out will likely make it harder for anything about our lifes to be found. That's the habit we need to build to at least put a level of privacy around us.
Hope you understand me now?