Bitcoin Forum
July 29, 2026, 03:21:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What makes you change one mining pool for another?  (Read 66 times)
hashradar (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 3


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2026, 01:22:51 PM
 #1

I'm trying to compare different mining pools because nowadays everything is quite similar. I can't really find any major differences between mining pools, but I want to.  Huh

It seems that miners don't always move to the pool that appears to offer the best returns.

There are obvious reasons to stay with a pool:
- trust built over many years;
- reputation;
- reliable payouts;
- a large community;
- good support.

But even when two pools seem equally stable, it's common to see many miners choosing the one with slightly lower effective profitability.

That made me wonder whether profitability is actually much lower on the priority list than people think.

So I'm curious:
What usually makes you switch pools?


Is it:
- higher earnings?
- lower fees?
- better support?
- a better dashboard?
- payout system?
- fewer stale shares?
- transparency?
- something else entirely?

If you had to rank the three most important factors when choosing a mining pool, what would they be?  Smiley
FP91G
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1658



View Profile
July 27, 2026, 07:52:38 PM
 #2

Most large Bitcoin mining pools have been around for a long time and have earned their trust and reputation.

The main criterion is a good ping, because even if the pool is the best, you'll lose shares due to a poor connection and receive less profit. If you have a high-quality internet connection, then you will look at other parameters.
Leonid_EMCD
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 28, 2026, 12:42:33 PM
 #3

Hi! Honestly, if the ping and the reward method are virtually the same across several pools, you won't notice any difference. That’s exactly why pools are now focusing on developing additional products to help boost mining revenue. At our pool, EMCD, we’ve introduced a savings account feature; you can set up automatic deposits from your mining earnings and earn up to 14% APY. We’ve been around for over nine years, and if you're interested, we can discuss a custom fee rate for you on our pool.You can email me at my work address. Cheesy
Leonid_EMCD
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 28, 2026, 12:48:51 PM
 #4

As my work shows, personal trust is what matters most to miners; the majority choose a single pool and mine there most of the time simply because they trust it. However, large-scale miners with a hashrate of 100 PH or higher constantly test other pools and switch between them based on the revenue each pool generates.
FP91G
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1658



View Profile
July 28, 2026, 04:20:52 PM
 #5

Hi! Honestly, if the ping and the reward method are virtually the same across several pools, you won't notice any difference. That’s exactly why pools are now focusing on developing additional products to help boost mining revenue. At our pool, EMCD, we’ve introduced a savings account feature; you can set up automatic deposits from your mining earnings and earn up to 14% APY. We’ve been around for over nine years, and if you're interested, we can discuss a custom fee rate for you on our pool.You can email me at my work address. Cheesy
Rebooting an ASIC and reaching full hashing power takes 10-20 minutes on a new pool. If you think miners are eager to experiment just to make a few extra dollars, you're wrong.
Leonid_EMCD
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 28, 2026, 08:51:32 PM
Last edit: July 28, 2026, 09:02:11 PM by Leonid_EMCD
 #6

Read my next message: that’s exactly what I wrote about. It only makes sense when you have a high hashrate and the difference in earnings is significant.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!