Subsidies a tools for a balanced government?

[Israelgogo]

I really want to understand more why government always find interest in removing subsidy in a dying economy and promising to fix this funds from subsidies removal to different departments, but after a while the same funds are either use for personal travels, luxuries and insurance, what's actually the purpose of Subsidy? Like I want to know. Is it lack of knowledge or wicked mandate that so much money that's entrusted into the hands of government can not be explained where it lost to, what is used for, because same problems you claim to solves when they enter seats, is even worst of what the citizens are going through. What's this Subsidy all about for?

[Dunamisx]

Every government have their plans on how they want their administration to operate. If you are also new in an office, I know that you will make some reforms based on the plan for your own tenure; therefore let picture it from this perspective.

Back to the issue of subsidy removal, when this takes place, a spec that the government should use the fund in rebuilding the community and ensuring that people have access to enough infrastructures an other social amenities in the country, where the developing countries comes in to take advantage of effects like this for rural electrification, road construction, building free medical facilities, and also ensuring there is enough and adequate clean water for people to drink in the society, most especially the rural areas.

[Royal Cap]

I really want to understand more why government always find interest in removing subsidy in a dying economy and promising to fix this funds from subsidies removal to different departments, but after a while the same funds are either use for personal travels, luxuries and insurance, what's actually the purpose of Subsidy? Like I want to know.

Well, the main purpose of subsidy is not bad. Usually the government uses it to reduce the cost of food or any other important sector and reduce the pressure on the common people. Again as far as I know many times the decision is also taken to reduce some subsidies to maintain the balance of the economy in the long run.

Is it lack of knowledge or wicked mandate that so much money that's entrusted into the hands of government can not be explained where it lost to, what is used for, because same problems you claim to solves when they enter seats, is even worst of what the citizens are going through. What's this Subsidy all about for?

The real problem is often not the subsidy, but rather the lack of accountability, If the government says it will reduce subsidies and spend that money on education or infrastructure then where that money went and what results were achieved should be clearly presented to the public.

[uneng]

Subsidy can go to welfare programs to attend the poors, or it can be used to sponsor the government's agents paying for their meals, insurance, renting, luxuries and so on, as you said. And it can be also used to support businessmen through cheap interest or zero interest loans, especially for farmers.

Subsidies are necessary and very helpful, but end being used wrongly to favour political allies and as a dirty political strategy to maintain the masses accommodated and stagnant in eternal poverishness.

[$crypto$]

This is what I know --- subsidies are government assistance to the community by lowering food prices or other forms, which is to overcome the people that so that purchasing power remains stable.

Sometimes the allocation of subsidies is often misused by certain governments or officials where they enjoy themselves with luxury, this will not be strange because with a corrupt government then there is clearly worsening.