2 Connected Accounts - Hero Members and Sr. Members Are in the Same Campaign

[AakZaki]

It started with the instructions of someone who asked me to investigate some names, because he himself was a busy person and didn't have time to do it. So he asked me to make this accusation, if I found anything from the name he indicated.
Without thinking long I immediately worked on it, My investigation was as follows:

The two Accounts below are connected accounts:

• Mr Reporter - Hero Member at Rainbet Campaign
• Sticky Bomb - Sr. Member at Rainbet Campaign

Proof Transaction on the Blockchain:


List Address:
Mr Reporter - bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
Sticky Bomb - 1477pHixyao7U6mkJDj9dUmAfp949y9pBg

Mr Reporter - bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
sent to
Sticky Bomb - 1477pHixyao7U6mkJDj9dUmAfp949y9pBg

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/4ad215b4043d6da20bc570f8b46933cb58d938c9ba1cc239ca454763cb2aad59

Mr Reporter - bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
sent to
Sticky Bomb - 1477pHixyao7U6mkJDj9dUmAfp949y9pBg

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/8dbfb3d7278f45046a31dc06b916856813506b7ac5702de654c7b17a55112f2a

Proof Cheating Campaigns: Spreadsheets Rainbet


Merit Abuse:
Mr Reporter to Sticky Bomb

The 5 Merit data from Mr Reporter to Sticky Bomb in BPIP is not visible, because I think he deliberately did not add it so that it would not be visible in BPIP, because the least shipment seen in BPIP is 6 merits.



But I didn't run out of ways to check, 4/5 of the merit was distributed on two posts that are not at all feasible here.

Running a loan service in the local board is not bad but i would have advised you to exercise patient till you become somewhat an established member, maybe a full member rank upwards or you become a DT member so that your service can have some kind of integrity and not look like a child's play because some persons might even look at your rank and they get discouraged to use your service. However, the risks involved in lending money is way high such that you can lose money in the quest of trying to help members of the local board and in case someone defaults a loan, how can you handle that since you are not a DT member. Anyways, good luck to your service.

It doesn't matter bro, in a world of many possibilities, whoever can render a legitimate service should go ahead as long as he is capable of maintaining it for longer.

It is a free interest loan and he is the one sending money first to the participants, so he is the person that should be somewhat on the loosing side and needs protection against loan defaulters.

If he maintains a good conduct, in a short while, a trusted member can add him to their trust list and he becomes a DT member. Well done OP. It is a nice initiative to be of help to the Nigerian community.

https://bitlist.co/post/65982439

This will be a nice idea considering the wide range of acceptability in the crypto space right now and will also Foster the knowledge and involvements in the crypto market however
  The idea of pension is a safe, secured and almost zero risk savings for government workers, including bitcoin in that portfolio may to a large extent alter that originality of it as bitcoin is subject to fluctuations in value,
 Unless maybe there will be a way to stabilise the price of bitcoin or have insurance that will cover for inflation and price change otherwise I feel investment in bitcoin should be left optional to the investor

Bitcoin is profitable on a long-term basis and if the worker has a 20 years and above cushion before his retirement, he would be holding for long and his investments overtime must've experience the compounding effect of Bitcoin price appreciation, and would be much in profits, the volatility has much of it's effects on a short term basis, long-term is safer and more secured.

https://bitlist.co/post/65057809

Sticky Bomb to Mr Reporter

https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?from=Sticky%20Bomb&to=Mr%20Reporter

[Sticky Bomb]

I'll clear this in a minute, Mr Reporter sent me a PM sometime in 2025 and requested I help put him through the forum, I did and when Trustwallet was giving him issues, I helped him trade coins for a while before I stopped and asked him to start doing things by himself. Evidence of PM and WhatsApp chats would be sent in my next post.

[Sticky Bomb]

Here I screenshotted the date at the top so you can relate it to the timing of this transaction











Mr Reporter can also add any detail I missed

If you need any more clarification from me, just ask

[hugeblack]

If you need any more clarification from me, just ask

Unless new information emerges, this is convincing enough to prove the link between these two addresses. In the future, keep such conversations in the forum to make them easier to verify.

Also, the case did not involve the exchange of hundreds of merits, so so far there is no clear abuse.

[AakZaki]

I helped him trade coins for a while before I stopped and asked him to start doing things by himself.

What a strange practice. Mr Reporter should have been able to do it himself if he only wanted to exchange some BTC for USDT.
According to Mr Reporter records he has a Binance account, as evidenced by his Binance deposit address as follows: bc1q85589gy79he7xtatdzn8q503u6spx8jvmv8dh, the address has been in use since 2 January 2025, long before Mr Reporter sent it to you. 

[Sticky Bomb]

I helped him trade coins for a while before I stopped and asked him to start doing things by himself.

What a strange practice. Mr Reporter should have been able to do it himself if he only wanted to exchange some BTC for USDT.
According to Mr Reporter records he has a Binance account, as evidenced by his Binance deposit address as follows: bc1q85589gy79he7xtatdzn8q503u6spx8jvmv8dh, the address has been in use since 2 January 2025, long before Mr Reporter sent it to you. 

Hey man, did you mix-up something?
That deposit address belongs to me and not Mr. Reporter, and judging by that date you referenced, I don't think Mr. Reporter have even started earning from the forum, because as at the time he PM me, he was still stuck at member rank.

[julerz12]

~snip~
Maybe you must have not known but that address is owned by Shasan and I sent money there when repaying my loan.

I actually did not. That makes sense.
My bad, I didn't bother to search that specific Binance deposit address. 

[AakZaki]

What a strange practice. Mr Reporter should have been able to do it himself if he only wanted to exchange some BTC for USDT.
According to Mr Reporter records he has a Binance account, as evidenced by his Binance deposit address as follows: bc1q85589gy79he7xtatdzn8q503u6spx8jvmv8dh, the address has been in use since 2 January 2025, long before Mr Reporter sent it to you.  

Hey man, did you mix-up something?
That deposit address belongs to me and not Mr. Reporter, and judging by that date you referenced,

Ooh, before I mismentioned your Binance deposit address, It should be this Bybit Deposit address 1GVkKKWMR8eS1agybKpjkSnAwitty3NQC1 and 1H3wBWqukGmTerKe7SZcPmjDjhQXfUMheg belonging to Mr Reporter.

That means that Mr Reporter already has two Bybit account deposit addresses:

BTC transactions that have been made on 18/3/2025:

Mr Reporter - bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
to
Deposit Bybit - 1H3wBWqukGmTerKe7SZcPmjDjhQXfUMheg

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/acdf609bf6dedc5efc51e2aa75b06236915a3b06979818fe3598f3f4c320a6ce

BTC transactions that have been made 14/4/2025:

Mr Reporter - bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
to
Deposit Bybit - 1GVkKKWMR8eS1agybKpjkSnAwitty3NQC1

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e7e1f9d9dbfe025414ef1f429feace3f9330aa8d545b22e5dc9fd45d57586a06

So why is Mr Reporter asking you for help? while he should be able to do it himself on his Bybit account?

I don't think Mr. Reporter have even started earning from the forum, because as at the time he PM me, he was still stuck at member rank.

In this part, it seems like you are lying, because according to the data below you have both been accepted at the same time at Rainbet on 08/07/2025

Accepted Full Members:

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3567660
Current post count: (including this one) 526
Segwit Address: bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
Merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 116

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3608509
Current amount of Posts: 783
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 90
bech32 BTC Address:bc1q85589gy79he7xtatdzn8q503u6spx8jvmv88dh

Thank you all for your applications! We are once again CFNP.

Is this also a coincidence?  

[The Cryptovator]

Thanks for your effort to identify alt accounts. But in that case, I don’t feel it’s clear abuse just for sending merits and for the blockchain transactions. Transactions would occur for any reason with forum users, but the deal should go through the forum PM for transparency.

I don’t want to just judge based on the transaction and merit. We might have friends here, and sometimes we may send them funds and merit as well. Based on all the provided details in this thread, I am not going to take any action against accused users.

[Sticky Bomb]

What a strange practice. Mr Reporter should have been able to do it himself if he only wanted to exchange some BTC for USDT.
According to Mr Reporter records he has a Binance account, as evidenced by his Binance deposit address as follows: bc1q85589gy79he7xtatdzn8q503u6spx8jvmv8dh, the address has been in use since 2 January 2025, long before Mr Reporter sent it to you.  

Hey man, did you mix-up something?
That deposit address belongs to me and not Mr. Reporter, and judging by that date you referenced,

Ooh, before I mismentioned your Binance deposit address, It should be this Bybit Deposit address 1GVkKKWMR8eS1agybKpjkSnAwitty3NQC1 and 1H3wBWqukGmTerKe7SZcPmjDjhQXfUMheg belonging to Mr Reporter.

That means that Mr Reporter already has two Bybit account deposit addresses:

BTC transactions that have been made on 18/3/2025:

Mr Reporter - bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
to
Deposit Bybit - 1H3wBWqukGmTerKe7SZcPmjDjhQXfUMheg

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/acdf609bf6dedc5efc51e2aa75b06236915a3b06979818fe3598f3f4c320a6ce

BTC transactions that have been made 14/4/2025:

Mr Reporter - bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
to
Deposit Bybit - 1GVkKKWMR8eS1agybKpjkSnAwitty3NQC1

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/e7e1f9d9dbfe025414ef1f429feace3f9330aa8d545b22e5dc9fd45d57586a06
So why is Mr Reporter asking you for help? while he should be able to do it himself on his Bybit account?

This shows you didn't go through the WhatsApp evidence properly
Look at this below

The Voice note is where he explained he's having issues with sending funds from his trust wallet to his own account. I asked him for his login details to help him log into it and do P2P for him, but he doesn't even remember his password and pleaded I used mine since he has to pay his loan and didn't want to miss deadline.

I don't think Mr. Reporter have even started earning from the forum, because as at the time he PM me, he was still stuck at member rank.

In this part, it seems like you are lying, because according to the data below you have both been accepted at the same time at Rainbet on 08/07/2025
[/quote]
I was a full member long before Mr. Reporter, I already worked in old duelbit campaign. Check the last week on the spreadsheet, I also worked on Evo.io under Yahoo for many weeks before getting into Rainbet

Accepted Full Members:

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3567660
Current post count: (including this one) 526
Segwit Address: bc1qndcj0en3mzjguzdeetvufpwpz9qksjessnfrje
Merit EARNED in the last 120 days: 116

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3608509
Current amount of Posts: 783
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 90
bech32 BTC Address:bc1q85589gy79he7xtatdzn8q503u6spx8jvmv88dh

Thank you all for your applications! We are once again CFNP.

I left Evo.io for Rainbet, you can reference the spreadsheet for Evo.io, that was when Mr. Reporter and I was accepted in the same campaign.

Yahoo62278 can confirm if this is legit or not

This is all for now, if you need more clarification, please ask

[bitgolden]

the deal should go through the forum PM for transparency.

But, I feel too weird on learning the need of explaining to this community and must maintain all proof for transacting with other forum member.

In my opinion, transacting never proves altaccounts unless you have other solid evidences.

[SuperBitMan]

Concerning the transactions that happen between Sticky Bomb and Mr Reporter. I believe the explanation and evidence that was provided by Sticky Bomb is a clear one, and there’s no reason to stress the matter forward except good evidence is provided later.

About sending merit to each other, I don’t see any abuse there, the only time we can use that against them or see it as an abuse is when we confirm that both account are actually connected.
I believe there are people that has merited you and you have also merited many times, same thing goes to all of us in this forum.

[Kavelj22]

~snip~
Maybe you must have not known but that address is owned by Shasan and I sent money there when repaying my loan.

I actually did not. That makes sense.
My bad, I didn't bother to search that specific Binance deposit address. 

That address is still owned by shasan and I will use it to repay my loan in bitcoin. I already have an active loan in btc: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg66892885#msg66892885

Your lack of attention is damaging the reputation of good members. Please delete your post and be more careful next time when investigating and before posting content that might harms the reputation of others. You are a respectful forum member. Please remove me from your post or delete it.

[julerz12]

That address is still owned by shasan and I will use it to repay my loan in bitcoin. I already have an active loan in btc: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.msg66892885#msg66892885

Yep. BIT-BENDER already made that clear, and I've already acknowledged my mistake. No need to repeat things over. 

Your lack of attention is damaging the reputation of good members.

Calm down, bro. No one's reputation got damaged; I was only curious as to what's with the connections to that deposit address.

As for the other accounts... no idea why they use the same Binance deposit address.

Post deleted as requested.    Maybe @BIT-BENDER should unquote the post, too.

[TokenTikas]

It started with the instructions of someone who asked me to investigate some names, because he himself was a busy person and didn't have time to do it. So he asked me to make this accusation, if I found anything from the name he indicated.

Your work on finding connected accounts is always the best. The way every one of your reports graphically identifies and presents all the details is nice. Two accounts have been reported. Among them, I know the user Mr Reporter from the time when (Art and Mud) was running a contest because I had given some ideas regarding the voting.

But regarding the issue that has been reported here about being connected, I don't know how reasonable it is. However, from the points they have presented, it seems that nothing like that has been misused. Completely agree with you, if they can provide transparency from their side and make their position clear, then it is better not to go against them.

[Xiestar]

It started with the instructions of someone who asked me to investigate some names, because he himself was a busy person and didn't have time to do it. So he asked me to make this accusation, if I found anything from the name he indicated.

Your work on finding connected accounts is always the best. The way every one of your reports graphically identifies and presents all the details is nice. Two accounts have been reported. Among them, I know the user Mr Reporter from the time when (Art and Mud) was running a contest because I had given some ideas regarding the voting.

But regarding the issue that has been reported here about being connected, I don't know how reasonable it is. However, from the points they have presented, it seems that nothing like that has been misused. Completely agree with you, if they can provide transparency from their side and make their position clear, then it is better not to go against them.

Guess what, They are doing this for a long time and you even supported them on their other findings when the user involved is not from Nigeria.

You knew that timestamp from telegram chat can be modified by using multiple different method. They can also create the screenshot right after noticing they made a mistake on that same day that’s why there’s a return on address to mask it as P2P transaction.

Some user disagree too. I will guess, from Nigeria again.  

[TokenTikas]

Guess what, They are doing this for a long time and you even supported them on their other findings when the user involved is not from Nigeria.

I think you probably understand completely how I supported the investigation. I said that if they can prove their position solidly with transparency, then they should be supported in this case.

You knew that timestamp from telegram chat can be modified by using multiple different method. They can also create the screenshot right after noticing they made a mistake on that same day that’s why there’s a return on address to mask it as P2P transaction.

This is not an easy matter because if someone changes the (Telegram chat timestamp) and creates screenshots to try to prove their transparency, they will definitely get caught. But if the address is available, the transactions can be found very easily. Anyone who tries to show this kind of screenshot and random transaction history will get caught. But if they can share the solid information with transparency then there will naturally be nothing left to say.

[Xiestar]

You knew that timestamp from telegram chat can be modified by using multiple different method. They can also create the screenshot right after noticing they made a mistake on that same day that’s why there’s a return on address to mask it as P2P transaction.

This is not an easy matter because if someone changes the (Telegram chat timestamp) and creates screenshots to try to prove their transparency, they will definitely get caught. But if the address is available, the transactions can be found very easily. Anyone who tries to show this kind of screenshot and random transaction history will get caught. But if they can share the solid information with transparency then there will naturally be nothing left to say.

That’s not sounds plausible. There’s indeed transaction happened so the transaction history is not the one being in questioned here.

After mistake was done. The user can masked transaction mistake that he returned it back in a form of “exchanging it for me”. He can create a fake conversation like this to show that they are transacting on telegram to match the timeline of the transaction. Even the screenshot of PM can be manipulated. Besides, check Zaki latest findings regarding exchange account of user involved. He has his own exchange account to do this for himself.