Welcome to the forum.
I like this idea of having a single place in which we can check all bonuses from the most popular casinos and fully understand what their conditions are before we decide to take them.
Though, there is something which catches my attention, you say all the information about bonuses is reviewed manually, which leads me to assume much of your content is compiled with the help of artificial intelligence and then checked by you or your team. Because we are talking about such a big volume of information from a lot of casinos, such amount of work could not realistically be done by a single person manually checking all those casinos and keep the directory up-to-date.
It would be good if you made some clarification on your use of AI to gather information.
Thank you for your thoughtful question.
At the moment, Bonus.Cloud is developed by just two people, so you’re absolutely right that we have to use AI as a tool to help us work more efficiently.
Our process always starts with the casino itself—not with AI.
First, we look for casinos that offer interesting and worthwhile bonus programs. Before listing a casino on Bonus.Cloud, we create an account, make a deposit, test the platform ourselves, and usually claim and use the welcome bonus. Whenever possible, we also test additional promotions offered by the casino.
Of course, it’s not always possible to fully complete every bonus. For example, some welcome offers require 30x or 40x wagering, and realistically we don’t always manage to finish the entire wagering cycle or reach a withdrawal from every single bonus we test.
Once we’ve tested the platform and confirmed that deposits and withdrawals work correctly, we carefully read the official Terms & Conditions for both the casino and its bonuses.
This is where AI helps us. We use it to organize and simplify the information because bonus terms are often extremely long, repetitive, and difficult to read. However, the source of the information is always the official Terms & Conditions together with our own testing—not AI-generated assumptions.
In summary, what I realized is that you gather bonus offers from various gambling platforms and you add them to your website. Probably it’s kind of an affiliate business; people may register through your links. Make sure you are adding reputable gambling platforms; they shouldn't be proven scammers.
However, the website seems pretty simple, and so does your announcement. Since it’s gambling-related, the design should be pretty cool. Good luck to you.
Thank you for your feedback and your good wishes!
You’re right that Bonus.Cloud is an affiliate project. However, our main goal isn’t simply to collect casinos and place affiliate links. We want to help players understand what they’re actually claiming before making a deposit.
But what's the difference between your site and any other review site that work on affiliation by listing projects with some good features? The only difference is that you pretend to be unique that you focus on bonus offered by the casinos you listed while we know that all casinos in the crypto-based casinos are offering various bonuses, in addition to the Bonus.
Cloud suffix extension that makes the user think it is an onnovation.
Whatever, no harm with your service if you carefully chose which casinos to list because scam casinos always promise a great bonus that is sometimes so good to be true. You have to use and evaluate each listed casinos because your service is acting as a monitor to redirect isers to specific destinations.
Thank you for sharing your perspective.
We completely agree that choosing which casinos to list is a very important responsibility. Unfortunately, if you look at almost any crypto casino—including some of the biggest and most established brands—you’ll find complaints, scam accusations, and negative reviews somewhere on the internet. No casino has a perfect reputation, and their Terms & Conditions often give operators broad discretion to suspend accounts or request additional verification when they consider it necessary.
For that reason, we don’t believe it’s realistic to claim that only “perfect” casinos should be listed, because such casinos simply don’t exist.
As for what makes Bonus.Cloud different, we’ll let the community decide that over time. Our goal isn’t to compete by having the biggest database or the flashiest design. Instead, we’re trying to solve one specific problem: making casino bonuses easy to understand.
We haven’t come across many websites that explain, step by step, how to claim a bonus, summarize the most important Terms & Conditions in plain language, and highlight the details that actually matter—such as wagering requirements, minimum deposits, maximum cashout rules, claiming instructions, and other important restrictions.
That’s the gap we’re trying to fill. Whether we succeed is something the community will ultimately decide, but we’ll continue improving the project based on feedback like yours.
Thanks again for taking the time to share your thoughts.
Welcome to the forum, your domain name sounds like you're not related to a casino review but some sort of cloud related operations. Anyway, I've got a suggestion, I thought that it was loading until I noticed it's not moving at all. I was talking about the "find a match". There can be a better image for that when someone clicks on it, and you can make the names of the casinos a little bit brighter and bigger.
Bonus.Cloud itself is available to everyone. There are no geo-restrictions on accessing our website.
I used TOR in it but, "this site can't be reached".
Thank you for your feedback!
You’re not the first person to mention the .cloud domain. We understand why it may initially sound unrelated to casino bonuses, but we hope that as the project grows, the name will become associated with Bonus.Cloud itself rather than the domain extension.
Regarding the Bonus Matcher, you’re absolutely right. It’s not exactly what we originally envisioned—it reflects what our developers were able to build for the first version of the website. We already have ideas for a much more polished and interactive version, but unfortunately we weren’t able to implement it before launch. It’s definitely something we plan to improve in future updates.
As for the Tor issue, thank you for reporting it. We honestly weren’t aware of it and hadn’t tested the website through the Tor network. We’ll add this to our list of upcoming improvements and investigate what’s causing the problem.
Thanks again for taking the time to test the website and share your suggestions!
