One account got a signature ban, then alt account woke up.

[Pandu Geddon]

I'm focused on the account n0ne, which got a SigBan on 3/8/2026.
I saw today there were three woke up accounts around the same time that I suspect are alts of @n0ne.


https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php

I'm trying to track a transaction from the address AjithBtc: 0x1F44A232A9801E60Dc98FD890859D95fa2770b6B, and saw some connected to a few accounts.

Ethereum address: 0x1F44A232A9801E60Dc98FD890859D95fa2770b6B

ASHLIUSZ Banned
KennyR SigBan until May 20, 2027
Vaskiy
BitLing Banned

https://etherscan.io/address/0x1F44A232A9801E60Dc98FD890859D95fa2770b6B

other transactions: @n0ne and @AjithBtc sent deposits to the address used by @romero121: https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/37huTxwddf44Lkuv56SLWatTcDST5Ckc9T

btc addy : bc1q4xrts9lwlkgkvtjfwn4xntpru9j5z6ll998zxh

BTC Address: 37huTxwddf44Lkuv56SLWatTcDST5Ckc9T

bech32 BTC Address: bc1qlk5phmhdxtrearcfhtj30fkj6pn7x7fmkwqxw6

Other transaction evidence points to @Awaklara's findings: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg58925954#msg58925954

https://etherscan.io/address/0x6cc5417901cf0388add7c73f33c334ffa3d4d332#tokentxns

Miscellaneous:
KennyR got a SigBan, but when I checked the Bitlist Modlog, there’s no data.
Vaskiy is active in the Bitlist campaign.
romero121 is active in the Vave campaign.

[SatoPrincess]

Good catch. It looks like Nutildah cut the head of a hydra. I doubt they will respond to the thread seeing as they already have an sig ban on their account.

[hosemary]

Here is another alt: MarkMJ (Trust: +0 / =0 /-2)

MarkMJ and Vaskiy used the same address.

BTC ADDRESS : 112RyTsEkxcj1wxrrK58RCgELL1pWyrpk3

Btc - 112RyTsEkxcj1wxrrK58RCgELL1pWyrpk3

KennyR got a SigBan, but when I checked the Bitlist Modlog, there’s no data.

That's because the user was sigbanned before nutildah became responsible for sigbans, when sigbans were not reported in the modlog. If you check KennyR's profile, you will see that he was last active in July 2025 and made his last post in 2024.

It looks like Nutildah cut the head of a hydra.

The user hasn't been sigbanned by nutildah.

[Sandra_hakeem]

So they all have the same pattern of reaction. More of a behavioral template, how hilarious is that? Strike one down, 30 more are awakened.

One funny dude on the appeal thread in meta said the more these accounts are blown out of their cover, the more job needs to be done as they would return with a hundred, possibly the whole army of alts and the whole moderation team/police would eventually get tired. I read, mulled over it and immediately understood that as long as the new moderation policy keeps chasing, they'll always be on the run. Good catch Btw.

[lovesmayfamilis]

I'm focused on the account n0ne, which got a SigBan on 3/8/2026.

I have a question: if alternative accounts are allowed, but if one account is blocked on the signature , can the second account apply for participation? There are two similar cases, but reading the main topic about the sigban, I realized that there are no violations in such cases. Or is it incorrect?🤔

1. AGogi2003
2. Adams0001 Banned from displaying signatures

Rank applied for- Full member
Scoras.io Username/UID- AGogi2003
Merit Earned in the last 120 days- 31

Bitcointalk profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3570987
Current post counts:733
Earned merit in the last 120 days: 29
bech32 BTC address: bc1qdt2qstwrxqyqhlj7m8ww3jgtvuywc678krl32j

1. robelneo
2. fortunecrypto Banned from displaying signatures

[m2017]

I'm focused on the account n0ne, which got a SigBan on 3/8/2026.

I have a question: if alternative accounts are allowed, but if one account is blocked on the signature , can the second account apply for participation? There are two similar cases, but reading the main topic about the sigban, I realized that there are no violations in such cases. Or is it incorrect?🤔

You took the words right out of my mouth.

Here are my thoughts on the matter, which might well differ from what you’ve seen in discussions about signature bans: It isn't the account itself that violates the rules, but the user behind it. That’s why I believe a ban should extend to their other accounts as well. After all, as you can see, if a signature gets banned on one account, they simply "wake up" another account and slap the signature onto that one instead. Did the user actually face any real punishment? Not really, because they just easily "switched shell" by moving the signature from one carrier to another.

By the way, I’ve always wondered: why do people using multiple accounts stick to the same BTC-addresses? Do they not realize they can create unique BTC-addresses for each account to avoid linking them, or are they just too lazy to do it? It’s hardly news that multi-accounts are often identified precisely through their published BTC-addresses. It’s high time these users learned a thing or two.

[hugeblack]

I have a question: if alternative accounts are allowed, but if one account is blocked on the signature , can the second account apply for participation? There are two similar cases, but reading the main topic about the sigban, I realized that there are no violations in such cases. Or is it incorrect?🤔

SigBan is based on the account owner's behavior, not the account itself. Therefore, if multiple accounts belonging to the account owner are discovered, they will all be banned.

If this isn't part of the forum rules, post about it here ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0 and we will support its inclusion.

[FinneysTrueVision]

You took the words right out of my mouth.

Here are my thoughts on the matter, which might well differ from what you’ve seen in discussions about signature bans: It isn't the account itself that violates the rules, but the user behind it. That’s why I believe a ban should extend to their other accounts as well. After all, as you can see, if a signature gets banned on one account, they simply "wake up" another account and slap the signature onto that one instead. Did the user actually face any real punishment? Not really, because they just easily "switched shell" by moving the signature from one carrier to another.

There isn’t a clear rule against using another account when you have one account with a signature ban though I’m guessing if they have a farm of accounts like the ones mentioned by the OP, they will eventually get signature banned also due to their poor writing quality. People with multiple permabanned accounts rarely contribute anything of value and only leech off the forum.

By the way, I’ve always wondered: why do people using multiple accounts stick to the same BTC-addresses? Do they not realize they can create unique BTC-addresses for each account to avoid linking them, or are they just too lazy to do it? It’s hardly news that multi-accounts are often identified precisely through their published BTC-addresses. It’s high time these users learned a thing or two.

CEXs don’t always allow generating multiple deposit addresses. Account based blockchains, like ETH and BNB Chain, only allow 1 address per account so address reuse is very common. You also may need to regularly refill your wallet with gas and doing this without exposing ownership of another address can be tricky.

[libert19]

By the way, I’ve always wondered: why do people using multiple accounts stick to the same BTC-addresses? Do they not realize they can create unique BTC-addresses for each account to avoid linking them, or are they just too lazy to do it? It’s hardly news that multi-accounts are often identified precisely through their published BTC-addresses. It’s high time these users learned a thing or two.

CEXs don’t always allow generating multiple deposit addresses. Account based blockchains, like ETH and BNB Chain, only allow 1 address per account so address reuse is very common. You also may need to regularly refill your wallet with gas and doing this without exposing ownership of another address can be tricky.

I mean, it's not big deal to create new account itself even if per account one address is allowed. I haven't been active in crypto as of late, but I remember there were evm wallets where under 1 seed phrase you could create infinite addresses each having different private key. How easier it could get?

As for refilling gas with being bit private, it can be done with instant exchanges, evm bridges but using same address on multiple accounts is just retarded.

[Shishir99]

Here are my thoughts on the matter, which might well differ from what you’ve seen in discussions about signature bans: It isn't the account itself that violates the rules, but the user behind it. That’s why I believe a ban should extend to their other accounts as well. After all, as you can see, if a signature gets banned on one account, they simply "wake up" another account and slap the signature onto that one instead. Did the user actually face any real punishment? Not really, because they just easily "switched shell" by moving the signature from one carrier to another.

I would say the same thing and support extending the ban to other accounts as well. However, people may use multiple accounts and spend less time on their other accounts, which is why they might not earn enough merits. If that is a known alternative account, declared by the owner, then I don't support extending the ban to that account. In most cases, they do not even participate in signature campaigns. However, if the account is not declared by the owner but is caught by the community, I think the signature ban should be extended to their other accounts as well.

[The Cryptovator]

I have a question: if alternative accounts are allowed, but if one account is blocked on the signature , can the second account apply for participation? There are two similar cases, but reading the main topic about the sigban, I realized that there are no violations in such cases. Or is it incorrect?🤔

No, they aren’t allowed to participate in the signature with alt accounts upon being banned. Ban evasion rules should follow for the signature ban as well. Because the forum or responsible user banning the user as a person, it’s just not the account.

Regarding OP, alt accounts also should get signatures banned as well. It’s a better solution instead of the red tag. And according to the provided evidence, it seems to be alts. Ban evasion rules should apply.

[hosemary]

Should we post negative feedback against the accounts mentioned in the OP?
No one has red tagged the accounts yet, and I would like to know others' opinions before taking action.

ASHLIUSZ and BitLing have been banned from forum, which means the others are evading the ban.
They are are also connected to account seller MarkMJ. I shared the evidence in my previous post.

[nutildah]

I have a question: if alternative accounts are allowed, but if one account is blocked on the signature , can the second account apply for participation? There are two similar cases, but reading the main topic about the sigban, I realized that there are no violations in such cases. Or is it incorrect?🤔

No, they aren’t allowed to participate in the signature with alt accounts upon being banned. Ban evasion rules should follow for the signature ban as well. Because the forum or responsible user banning the user as a person, it’s just not the account.

Regarding OP, alt accounts also should get signatures banned as well. It’s a better solution instead of the red tag. And according to the provided evidence, it seems to be alts. Ban evasion rules should apply.

This is probably something that should be reported to the mods, because they are the ones who decide what constitutes an alt account for application of the law, and they can also issue sigbans.

Besides, things might get messy if I start handing out sigbans for being an alt. I've been sticking to a random sampling procedure, plus the occasional high-scoring AI poster (3 so far).

[Pandu Geddon]

No one has red tagged the accounts yet, and I would like to know others' opinions before taking action.

ASHLIUSZ and BitLing have been banned from forum, which means the others are evading the ban.

I’m going to leave a neutral tag regarding accounts connected to those accounts. There's no reason to give a negative tag for now, unless it’s decided that the rules are the same as ban evading.

As for ban evading, I don’t think reporting to a moderator will result in a ban for accounts that are still active. Transaction evidence alone isn’t strong enough to punish them.