Bitcoin Forum
August 14, 2026, 05:52:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Successor of Vlad2Vlad, Julien_Olynpic source merit abuse at CHAMBY meme token  (Read 779 times)
Lucius
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4060
Merit: 7711



View Profile WWW
August 13, 2026, 01:10:54 PM
 #21

~snip~
 Shocked Shocked you're taking the forum seriously. As long as the accusations are true, you shouldn't be afraid to post them from your main account. There are a few reasons to create an alt account, and this certainly shouldn't be one of them.


I think the OP did the right thing by doing this with the alt account, because the people he touched are very vindictive if someone gets in their way. What's strange to me in this case is that the admin didn't notice anything considering that this has been going on for a long time, and he checks the merits sources from time to time.

This is already the third case of a malicious merit source in a short time, and there are likely to be more.

notocactus
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 5113


Glory to Ukraine!


View Profile
August 13, 2026, 03:18:51 PM
 #22

This is already the third case of a malicious merit source in a short time, and there are likely to be more.
Only removed, no demerit action on spammers that are not deserved with their ranks.

Five years are long time enough for ranking up many spammers.

From 21171 sourced merit in 30 days to 34139 merits in 30 days, it was about 13k increase and it has last for about 5 years. Even now, total sourced merits each 30 days are still much higher than the figure in June 2020.

More source merits, more merits per merited post while quality looks to not increase, but decrease significantly and there are actually reasons.

Dataset
Code:
     +----------------------------------+
     |      date   meritsource   smerit |
     |----------------------------------|
  1. | 01aug2026            85    30972 |
  2. | 07jun2025            88    33138 |
  3. | 15sep2024           109    33190 |
  4. | 01may2024           109    32990 |
  5. | 22mar2024           108    32890 |
  6. | 28nov2023           109    33140 |
  7. | 31jul2023           109    33940 |
  8. | 11jul2022           110    33989 |
  9. | 06jul2021           111    34139 |
 10. | 28jun2020            97    21171 |
There is currently no such thing as a "demerit". I'm hoping that the positive merits alone will be fine. I could add demerits pretty easily later on if necessary, though.
When?
I'm still thinking about ways to resolve this issue, possibly involving rejiggering how merit works.

 
 b1exch.to 
  ETH      DAI   
  BTC      LTC   
  USDT     XMR    
.███████████▄▀▄▀
█████████▄█▄▀
███████████
███████▄█▀
█▀█
▄▄▀░░██▄▄
▄▀██▄▀█████▄
██▄▀░▄██████
███████░█████
█░████░█████████
█░█░█░████░█████
█░█░█░██░█████
▀▀▀▄█▄████▀▀▀
LoyceV
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4130
Merit: 22468


Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2026, 06:14:37 PM
 #23

What I have done is to leave a neutral tag.
Should the former Meric source receive a similar tag?

¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!