[POLL] Add tough entry criteria for contests to stop account farmers and cheats?

[stompix]

Do I actually have to explain you why someone who submits 10 pizzas has a higher probability to win compared to someone who submits only one?

Yeah do, walk around me through the math process of this, guess I spent 20 years learning the wrong math.

While you're at do tell me , what's the change in probability:
- me winning in 1 vs 1 race vs Usain Bolt, me and 6 friends running in a 7 vs 1 and beating Usain Bolt
- me submitting a song and topping Taylor Swift in the Billboard and me submitting 1000 songs and having at least one beat her singles

If you would have talked about competitions about price predictions, the goal minute or just picking a random numbers, yeah, that's where it matters, and I'm pretty sure that in the last year cheaters have milked those twice as much in $ than the whole pizza contest today.

So for you participating with multiple accounts, submitting multiple pizzas, and voting for his own pizzas using several alt accounts is "winning fair and square"?

When did the bolded part happen?
I might have missed this and since I don't see any red tag label from you on any of them for this, can you point me to it so I can do the tagging?

[Free Market Capitalist]

So for you participating with multiple accounts, submitting multiple pizzas, and voting for his own pizzas using several alt accounts is "winning fair and square"?

When did the bolded part happen?
I might have missed this and since I don't see any red tag label from you on any of them for this, can you point me to it so I can do the tagging?

You posted on this thread.

How big is the "CryptoYar" account farm?

I haven't checked but didn't they vote for their alts/farm members?

[JollyGood]

fillippone made some suggestions that caught my eye therefore I have updated the poll to add three new options.

Over the past few days I have started to lean towards not having restrictions on newbie accounts entering any contest or competition unless the account was created within 30-50 days of them entering. Also, I see a logic that only a particular rank such as Hero and Legendary should be allowed to vote. This will minimise the overall number of votes but will reduce the possibility of collusion.

If you have any suggestions that could be added to the poll, post them here. I am sure many of you will have different ideas therefore your input is important in this thread.

[stompix]

You posted on this thread.
How big is the "CryptoYar" account farm?
I haven't checked but didn't they vote for their alts/farm members?

Nobody bought the voting thing in that accusation topic, this is why I am asking, the accusation and tags are for multiple accounts entering.
Now that I look in the other topic, one of his alts has voted for his pizza the other did not, 1 vote, he won by 7 votes so unless you find 6 more fraudulent votes the thing is that he would still have won.

And about voting, that is the thing I already mentioned,  as voting is easier to abuse than baking 100 pizzas and hoping one turns into a Michelin dish:

If we talk about voting, yeah, that's a different thing, I actually think we need to select those and have a limited jury, but for the actual participation,  I can't think of a way in which a guy with 10 accounts makes better pizzas than one with just one, solely based on this and not because of his talent.

Also, if you want to further clean up multi-account abuse in that competition, you can do it the way fantasy leagues work, $10 participation fee and the pot goes to the winner.
This will gatekeep more accounts than merit and activity.

[JollyGood]

This is an interesting suggestion. How many account farmers would enter contests and competitions if they had to pay a fee? For example, an account farmer with 10 accounts would not want to pay $10 each and a total of $100 to enter all ten accounts in the knowledge that none of them are guaranteed to win. Now, imagine if the entry fee was $20 

As the number of entrants will definitely fall if an entry fee was mandatory, that is where the sponsorship money will make it worthwhile for genuine entrants. I am adding the option to the poll.

Also, if you want to further clean up multi-account abuse in that competition, you can do it the way fantasy leagues work, $10 participation fee and the pot goes to the winner.
This will gatekeep more accounts than merit and activity.

[Sandra_hakeem]

...

It's this simple. Reply to this question:

Why can't a six days old account participate in the serious boards or in signature campaigns but can win a $1,5K prize for making a fucking pizza?

I have never supported newbie participation in any activity that'd eventually earn them some cash because;
There's a high chance that a newbie who finds an interest in contest few days after their registration (and sometimes not in sig.camp) is an alt that was created for that purpose. Do you know how long it took me to realize that there's a thing like the 'pizza contest', yet I haven't tried it once?

~snip Now, imagine if the entry fee was $20  

As the number of entrants will definitely fall if an entry fee was mandatory, that is where the sponsorship money will make it worthwhile for genuine entrants. I am adding the option to the poll.

Also, if you want to further clean up multi-account abuse in that competition, you can do it the way fantasy leagues work, $10 participation fee and the pot goes to the winner.
This will gatekeep more accounts than merit and activity.

If this paired with the "selected Legendary members acting as juries", we won't have to be discussing about this next time seriously.
"What's the probability of making it to the roster after enrolling 10 alts at $20 each? Even I did, what If it's the 3rd position? So I have to pay 200 bucks for an uncertain pool price". Voted!

[Ale88]

Do I actually have to explain you why someone who submits 10 pizzas has a higher probability to win compared to someone who submits only one?

Yeah do, walk around me through the math process of this, guess I spent 20 years learning the wrong math.

While you're at do tell me , what's the change in probability:
- me winning in 1 vs 1 race vs Usain Bolt, me and 6 friends running in a 7 vs 1 and beating Usain Bolt
- me submitting a song and topping Taylor Swift in the Billboard and me submitting 1000 songs and having at least one beat her singles

Maybe you missed this part:

Of course I'm talking about decent pizzas.

Also, as far as I know, on this forum there is no Usain Bolt of pizzas, we're just regular people, so maybe your example should be you winning a race against another random guy or you + 6 friends running against a random guy. Do you think that guy still has a 50-50 chance in both cases?

Nobody bought the voting thing in that accusation topic, this is why I am asking, the accusation and tags are for multiple accounts entering.
Now that I look in the other topic, one of his alts has voted for his pizza the other did not, 1 vote, he won by 7 votes so unless you find 6 more fraudulent votes the thing is that he would still have won.

Considering all the shady stuff we're seeing coming from the Pakistani board, it could be a matter of time. They planned the votes, it's shown in the other thread.

[stompix]

Also, as far as I know, on this forum there is no Usain Bolt of pizzas, we're just regular people, so maybe your example should be you winning a race against another random guy or you + 6 friends running against a random guy. Do you think that guy still has a 50-50 chance in both cases?

No, there is no chance whatsoever!
The guy which is the fastest will win, so if the cheater brings up 1000 more people but they are all slower than him it won't be doing him any good.
The same stands for you bringing 6 friends who are slower than you the cheater will still win if he is the fastest!

In both cases the fastest one will win no matter how many friends he or whoever else has bought!

Again, you need to face reality, 1 or 2 extra votes but:
- he would still have won
- none of your restrictions would have stopped him from participating, neither merit nor activity

If you want to present a solution start with one that would have stopped him from winning the competition cause right now none would have worked!

Considering all the shady stuff we're seeing coming from the Pakistani board, it could be a matter of time. They planned the votes, it's shown in the other thread.

So you're going to ban a whole board? Then another one?
Then the ones who don't have any kind of participation in local boards because they might be from Pakistan?

I told you a few times already, why don't you open a topic like this addressed directly to theymos and see if he will allow such a competition on his forum?