Rate our casino ranking. Disagree with it? Tell us why.

[Cointxz]

Among the sites listed on this platform, only Betking looks familiar to me, but I am not sure if it is the same Betking people used to talk about on this forum before. The rest are not known to me at all. Also, when I tried to open the official website of some listed casinos, all links redirect to one casino that is claimed as the top or most trusted option on this site. Just being honest, but this information service does not really help, because it looks more like promoting only one casino site.

It looks like there may simply be some confusion because of the identical name.
The BetKing listed on LuckAtlas is the Ukrainian BetKing at betking.com.ua. It is focused on the Ukrainian market.
There is also a separate BetKing.com operating in Nigeria. It is a different operator using the same name.
So it is quite possible that the BetKing you previously saw discussed on Bitcointalk was the other brand, but I do not want to assume that without checking.
My review is specifically about the Ukrainian BetKing:
https://luckatlas.com/betking-review/

Which BetKing did you have in mind?

I think he meant for Betking.io which is a popular casino before here that suddenly went closure after the failure of their token sale reward distribution and the alleged bankruptcy.

This is the ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1842538.0

I think I saw Betking brand too on Nigeria which is a very popular sportsbook in there.

[LuckAtlas]

Among the sites listed on this platform, only Betking looks familiar to me, but I am not sure if it is the same Betking people used to talk about on this forum before. The rest are not known to me at all. Also, when I tried to open the official website of some listed casinos, all links redirect to one casino that is claimed as the top or most trusted option on this site. Just being honest, but this information service does not really help, because it looks more like promoting only one casino site.

It looks like there may simply be some confusion because of the identical name.
The BetKing listed on LuckAtlas is the Ukrainian BetKing at betking.com.ua. It is focused on the Ukrainian market.
There is also a separate BetKing.com operating in Nigeria. It is a different operator using the same name.
So it is quite possible that the BetKing you previously saw discussed on Bitcointalk was the other brand, but I do not want to assume that without checking.
My review is specifically about the Ukrainian BetKing:
https://luckatlas.com/betking-review/

Which BetKing did you have in mind?

I think he meant for Betking.io which is a popular casino before here that suddenly went closure after the failure of their token sale reward distribution and the alleged bankruptcy.

This is the ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1842538.0

I think I saw Betking brand too on Nigeria which is a very popular sportsbook in there.

Now I understand where the confusion came from. The BetKing listed on LuckAtlas is the Ukrainian operator at betking.com.ua, while the old Betking.io from that ANN thread was a different project. Thanks for the link. Do you think clearly showing the domain and market next to the name would be enough to avoid this confusion?

[panjul07]

You ask us to rate the ranking you give to the listed casinos in your site but unfortunately all of them are not familiar for me, I believe most bitcointalk members too.
I have no idea where, why, and how do you choose those casinos to be listed on your site, are they all basically popular casinos in your country only?
Are all those casinos accept bitcoin or crypto as the payment method? Asked because I have not checked them as none of them own ANN thread in this forum.
So if you ask whether we are agree with the rating you give, I doubt none can answer it because they can be said as unknown casinos for bitcointalk community.

[LuckAtlas]

You ask us to rate the ranking you give to the listed casinos in your site but unfortunately all of them are not familiar for me, I believe most bitcointalk members too.
I have no idea where, why, and how do you choose those casinos to be listed on your site, are they all basically popular casinos in your country only?
Are all those casinos accept bitcoin or crypto as the payment method? Asked because I have not checked them as none of them own ANN thread in this forum.
So if you ask whether we are agree with the rating you give, I doubt none can answer it because they can be said as unknown casinos for bitcointalk community.

You’re right that if the brands are unfamiliar, it’s hard to judge the ranking just from the names. I’d suggest checking how the ratings are calculated first:
https://luckatlas.com/en/luckatlas-rating-methodology/
The current ranking is here:
https://luckatlas.com/en/#luckatlas-ratings
You can also open the individual reviews and, if a platform is available in your GEO, check the operator itself and compare what you see with our assessment:
https://luckatlas.com/en/ukraine-gambling-platform-reviews/
As for crypto, no, not every platform in the ranking is crypto-focused. Payment methods depend on the operator and sometimes on the user’s GEO. GGBET, for example, does support cryptocurrency payments, including Bitcoin on supported versions. Here is our review:
https://luckatlas.com/en/review-ggbet/
So I’d be interested in a more practical test: pick one or two platforms that are available to you, check the review and the actual product, and tell me which rating you would change and why.

[iv4n]

So I’d be interested in a more practical test: pick one or two platforms that are available to you, check the review and the actual product, and tell me which rating you would change and why.

Well, a "more practical test" would be you choosing the casino that accepts crypto, creating a nice promotion in the games & rounds section, and then players will give it a try... maybe...

I guess it all depends on how you do it, how much you trust these casinos on your page, and your partnership with them... Is there any casino ready to sponsor your ideas? Can you add more funds? So many questions... You can also check how some affiliates used to do it and pick up some ideas.

Good luck.

[Hispo]

ngl, not trying to hate, but this site looks kinda pointless. Why would someone even use it? There are barely any sites listed. We already have FairGambling and a bunch of other sites that are way bigger, with casino stats, streamer lists, who's live, earnings, and way more. You should at least look around at what's already out there before making a site like this

Well, if someone wants to create a review site like this one, there are supposed to start from somewhere, don't they?
Though, it is obvious there is a long path ahead before this review website could be compared to the biggest and most important competitors on the gambling ecosystem.

It is a matter of competition, new actors are always welcome, but they need to offer something to people like us in order to get interested, otherwise they will be left out of business. It is how this market is supposed to work and will continue to work.

[Ronsbit]

LuckAtlas started as a small casino review project, but the feedback in this thread changed quite a few things.

Website: https://luckatlas.com/en/

Some of you questioned how the ratings were calculated, whether complaints were taken seriously, how much of the user journey was actually tested, and why some GEO redirects could lead somewhere unexpected.
Those were fair questions.
Since then, I have rebuilt the rating methodology. It now explains what is checked, how reputation and public complaints are treated, how GEO and local brand versions are considered, and what scores such as 4.6, 4.8 or 4.9 actually mean.
The ratings on LuckAtlas are now clickable and lead directly to the explanation of that specific score.
I also changed the old “Official website” wording after users here pointed out that it could be misleading when GEO routing offered an alternative.
The catalog is still small, and there are still things I want to improve. I would rather develop it based on real criticism than simply add hundreds of brands.
So here is what I want to use this thread for:
If you think one of the casinos on LuckAtlas is rated too high or too low, challenge the rating.
Give me one specific issue, complaint, reputation signal or piece of information you think I missed.
If it checks out, I’ll review it.

This statement do sound somehow though. If my guess is not wrong, it sounds like you do the review and grading yourself after users have made comments, complaints etc.
You sound like you do such and I am sceptical about it because there are some complaints here already about some casino with good ratings on your platform but are fishy with the possibility of you not doing your proper research before putting such casino on your platform. The earlier you right your wrong the better for you.

[LuckAtlas]

LuckAtlas started as a small casino review project, but the feedback in this thread changed quite a few things.

Website: https://luckatlas.com/en/

Some of you questioned how the ratings were calculated, whether complaints were taken seriously, how much of the user journey was actually tested, and why some GEO redirects could lead somewhere unexpected.
Those were fair questions.
Since then, I have rebuilt the rating methodology. It now explains what is checked, how reputation and public complaints are treated, how GEO and local brand versions are considered, and what scores such as 4.6, 4.8 or 4.9 actually mean.
The ratings on LuckAtlas are now clickable and lead directly to the explanation of that specific score.
I also changed the old “Official website” wording after users here pointed out that it could be misleading when GEO routing offered an alternative.
The catalog is still small, and there are still things I want to improve. I would rather develop it based on real criticism than simply add hundreds of brands.
So here is what I want to use this thread for:
If you think one of the casinos on LuckAtlas is rated too high or too low, challenge the rating.
Give me one specific issue, complaint, reputation signal or piece of information you think I missed.
If it checks out, I’ll review it.

This statement do sound somehow though. If my guess is not wrong, it sounds like you do the review and grading yourself after users have made comments, complaints etc.
You sound like you do such and I am sceptical about it because there are some complaints here already about some casino with good ratings on your platform but are fishy with the possibility of you not doing your proper research before putting such casino on your platform. The earlier you right your wrong the better for you.

No, the ratings are not assigned after user comments. A review and rating are formed during the platform evaluation, while complaints or new facts are a reason to revisit and verify that assessment; if an issue is confirmed, the rating can be changed. You mentioned a highly rated casino that already has serious complaints here — which brand and which complaint are you referring to?

[Cointxz]

I think he meant for Betking.io which is a popular casino before here that suddenly went closure after the failure of their token sale reward distribution and the alleged bankruptcy.

This is the ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1842538.0

I think I saw Betking brand too on Nigeria which is a very popular sportsbook in there.

Now I understand where the confusion came from. The BetKing listed on LuckAtlas is the Ukrainian operator at betking.com.ua, while the old Betking.io from that ANN thread was a different project. Thanks for the link. Do you think clearly showing the domain and market next to the name would be enough to avoid this confusion?

I think it’s a good idea to include the domain so that it will create a distinction on the casino you are showcasing on your website since similarity on name is already common now due to popularity of online casino.

For example is Stake. It has Stake.com and Stake.us although they are owned by same company but still they are operating separately to each other.

I just noticed that only new casino available on your website or am I just missing the whole list?

[free-bit.co.in]

If this is the situation of your casino ranking then I doubt about your rating.

The casinos you have put at the top of the ranking are shady and I have heard the names of most of the casinos for the first time today. Can you tell me what is the criteria for selecting your casinos for ranking.

You have given BETKING a rating of 4.7 out of 5. However, this casino has a history of scamming their investors.

You have put GG.BET at the top of your ranking where there are a lot of complaints against this casino on almost all review sites including Trustpilot, CasinoGuru.

You should put Stake, Roobet, Rainbet, Bitz, 1win, FJ, Earnbet and other legit sites at the top. And mark those dubious sites in your list as suspicious.

[rohang]

If this is the situation of your casino ranking then I doubt about your rating.

The casinos you have put at the top of the ranking are shady and I have heard the names of most of the casinos for the first time today. Can you tell me what is the criteria for selecting your casinos for ranking.

You have given BETKING a rating of 4.7 out of 5. However, this casino has a history of scamming their investors.

You have put GG.BET at the top of your ranking where there are a lot of complaints against this casino on almost all review sites including Trustpilot, CasinoGuru.

You should put Stake, Roobet, Rainbet, Bitz, 1win, FJ, Earnbet and other legit sites at the top. And mark those dubious sites in your list as suspicious.

These are paid rankings/adverts/affiliate spam 100%

Very basic site with very little effort, only purpose is to catch some big affiliate,

Literally hundreds of sites like this are there promoting these trash casinos.

[Ayers]

These are paid rankings/adverts/affiliate spam 100%

Very basic site with very little effort, only purpose is to catch some big affiliate,

Literally hundreds of sites like this are there promoting these trash casinos.

I don't think his website is worth enough for paid promotion. It defiantly will not attracts any casino for affiliate partnership.

When names like BETKING and GGBET are in the top rankings, my first question would be, what exactly is the evidence behind this score?
I don't know if OP is promoting these sites intensely or if he is new and has less experience.
It could be that he is not aware of the BETKING scam. And GG.BET may not be that popular on our forum, but it has a lot of popularity worldwide. In the case of betking, it is also a very popular casino worldwide. Maybe OP will update his website after knowing this.

[Ronsbit]

LuckAtlas started as a small casino review project, but the feedback in this thread changed quite a few things.

Website: https://luckatlas.com/en/

Some of you questioned how the ratings were calculated, whether complaints were taken seriously, how much of the user journey was actually tested, and why some GEO redirects could lead somewhere unexpected.
Those were fair questions.
Since then, I have rebuilt the rating methodology. It now explains what is checked, how reputation and public complaints are treated, how GEO and local brand versions are considered, and what scores such as 4.6, 4.8 or 4.9 actually mean.
The ratings on LuckAtlas are now clickable and lead directly to the explanation of that specific score.
I also changed the old “Official website” wording after users here pointed out that it could be misleading when GEO routing offered an alternative.
The catalog is still small, and there are still things I want to improve. I would rather develop it based on real criticism than simply add hundreds of brands.
So here is what I want to use this thread for:
If you think one of the casinos on LuckAtlas is rated too high or too low, challenge the rating.
Give me one specific issue, complaint, reputation signal or piece of information you think I missed.
If it checks out, I’ll review it.

This statement do sound somehow though. If my guess is not wrong, it sounds like you do the review and grading yourself after users have made comments, complaints etc.
You sound like you do such and I am sceptical about it because there are some complaints here already about some casino with good ratings on your platform but are fishy with the possibility of you not doing your proper research before putting such casino on your platform. The earlier you right your wrong the better for you.

No, the ratings are not assigned after user comments. A review and rating are formed during the platform evaluation, while complaints or new facts are a reason to revisit and verify that assessment; if an issue is confirmed, the rating can be changed. You mentioned a highly rated casino that already has serious complaints here — which brand and which complaint are you referring to?

Sorry to say this that your review platform needs a review itself because it seems you don't do proper review before putting up casinos and the casinos I have seen on your platform looks new to me except for fee. What happened to the big names you have seen here?  Would you tell us that you didn't see them? You have seen stake here, rainbet, 1win, roobet, rollbit etc these are big names in the casino industry which we all know. I doubt if you truly did the review you claimed to have done because if you had done it, those casinos would beo where to be found on you ranking list. Already members are bringing up the ranking list as it is on your website so you can see it properly for yourself what you already have done.

[rohang]

These are paid rankings/adverts/affiliate spam 100%

Very basic site with very little effort, only purpose is to catch some big affiliate,

Literally hundreds of sites like this are there promoting these trash casinos.

I don't think his website is worth enough for paid promotion. It defiantly will not attracts any casino for affiliate partnership.

When names like BETKING and GGBET are in the top rankings, my first question would be, what exactly is the evidence behind this score?
I don't know if OP is promoting these sites intensely or if he is new and has less experience.
It could be that he is not aware of the BETKING scam. And GG.BET may not be that popular on our forum, but it has a lot of popularity worldwide. In the case of betking, it is also a very popular casino worldwide. Maybe OP will update his website after knowing this.

Yea u are right, no way this is paid promotion, its only affiliate spam with OP hoping to catch some referrals or maybe a big whale under him

I really hate the website design as well with the hideous background, looks like some amateur work and probably was vibe coded with AI

[Mate2237]

LuckAtlas started as a small casino review project, but the feedback in this thread changed quite a few things.

That is why it is good to be here. Because definitely the forum users will tell you how to do the right thing. And once you follow the inputs from the users, you will make a great project. When reviewing casinos, there basic things gamblers like to know and once they see them, they go straight to those things and check them and if they are good then they will visit the casino and once those information are not found in the review then they will back off.


And those things are the minimum and Maximum deposit and withdrawal. Restricted countries of the casinos or are they permitting gamblers to use VPN, the license and the bonus system of the casino and once those information are well spelled out. Gamblers will visit the casino but if there are not, different questions will arise again to know why there not there in the review. Because we believed those are the basic things to know before others.

[obuoma]

You have a nice website and I like the way the casinos are arranged, unfortunately you are advertising fiat based casinos in a cryptocurrency platform, that I consider improper because a lot of us here play more on crypto casinos and not fiat casinos. Furthermore, none of the casinos there is familiar, neither does any of them have presence in this forum, so while will I care how you rate services I have no need of? I'm sure this is the same thing that is going through the minds of lots of people in this forum which you can already see from the few responses.

[LuckAtlas]

These are paid rankings/adverts/affiliate spam 100%

Very basic site with very little effort, only purpose is to catch some big affiliate,

Literally hundreds of sites like this are there promoting these trash casinos.

I don't think his website is worth enough for paid promotion. It defiantly will not attracts any casino for affiliate partnership.

When names like BETKING and GGBET are in the top rankings, my first question would be, what exactly is the evidence behind this score?
I don't know if OP is promoting these sites intensely or if he is new and has less experience.
It could be that he is not aware of the BETKING scam. And GG.BET may not be that popular on our forum, but it has a lot of popularity worldwide. In the case of betking, it is also a very popular casino worldwide. Maybe OP will update his website after knowing this.

Before drawing conclusions like that, it’s worth first clarifying which specific brand and market you’re talking about; otherwise, it only adds confusion to the discussion. Betking.io, which was discussed on Bitcointalk and has its own history involving an ICO, closure, and later relaunch, is not the same operator as the Ukrainian BetKing at betking.com.ua that is listed on LuckAtlas. The situation with GGBET is similar — there are different regional versions.

If you have a specific publicly documented case involving the version of BetKing or GGBET that is listed on LuckAtlas, describe it here with the relevant market and circumstances. If the information is confirmed, it can be taken into account when reviewing the rating.

[tread93]

This looks like yet another gambling review site that is focused on FIAT sites more than crypto sites and probably want to make a quick buck through affiliates basically. Just like the posters above, I didn't recognise any popular crypto gambling site in their ranking.

They simply chose the wrong forum to advertise their site in my opinion. Avoid for now people.

Glad I didnt waste my time reading much more of this thread. If this isnt truly relevant to what this forum is really focused on than I am more than happy to prop this post up to the top. We are focused on crypto gambling here folks. Bitcoin talk. Duh.

[cryptocmd]

On the GEO question, since I run into the same problem on my own site: removing the fallback entirely just moves the disappointment one click later, the player now lands on the operator's "not available in your region" page instead of yours. What worked for me was doing the filtering before the click, on the list itself: each brand carries its own restricted-countries list and the page only shows brands that will actually take a deposit from the visitor's country, with a short line saying "X brands hidden, not available in your region" so nobody thinks the catalog is tiny. No redirect, no swap, the button always goes where the label says.

Two caveats from doing this: the operator's own T&C list is not enough, some brands block a country at the cashier without ever listing it (I found that out with Poland), so it has to be re-tested now and then. And whatever list a human from a country sees, a crawler from that country has to see the same one, otherwise you've built a cloaking setup by accident.

[aphelio_wane]

Everyone here telling about betking and ggbet but how is degen.com not even on ther list? No kyc, instant withdrawals, never had a single problem with them

You put all these casinos nobody even knows and skip the one people actually use daily. Makes no sense if you want your ranking to be taken seriously. Please reconsider