Nuclear war will bring the peace to the world that's the plan

[Oluwa-btc]

This peace could be achieved when many countries have the nuclear weapons. Since the Kim of North Korea has, or is suspected to have it, don't you see how it's difficult to invade him or intimidate his country?

If Venezuela has a nuclear weapon, do you think her president would have been abducted?
Possession of nuclear weapon serves as checks and balances between these powerful countries. If you ask me, that's the importance of having a powerful weapon that you cannot use.

Yeah! I believe so too. You build the nuclear weapon and nobody will have to tell you bullshit. They can only use proxies to fight them,otherwise,  a direct combat could see exchange of nuclear arsenals.

No they won't!
But the people in Venezuela are cowards. Where is the bravery during the time of Nuno Chavez? The new planted leader has restored connections with isreali regime and the people in Venezuela are still mute. I have never been this ashamed of a great people with fighting spirit. I can agree, until you build the nukes, you're seen as inferior and weak. It is enough reason why Africa needs to unite and have her own nuclear warheads.

Nuclear weapons will kill billions of people though and not peace. The rich will hide in bonkers underground but the poor and average should wouldn't

[programmer3666]

2 sides will use limited nuclear weapons but the outcome will be so devastated and even for envoirement that world will understood they can't continue anymore.

But to make others to understood 2 countries or sides will use nukes and that will bring the peace it will shock the world will have a lot casualties
The good thing is that will be good example the world learn to appreciate peace.
Wich one it will be nobody knows for real.

Nuclear war is not a tool for peace. It would cause massive loss of life and long-term environmental damage that would affect generations. History shows that peace comes from diplomacy and cooperation, not from destruction. The idea that using nuclear weapons could somehow teach the world a lesson ignores the reality of what they actually do. The damage would not be limited to the countries involved it would spread across the globe. And there is no guarantee that a limited strike would stay limited. Once that door opens, it's hard to close. The risk of escalation is too high to treat nuclear war as a strategy for peace

[Opiate32]

Nuclear war can never bring peace to this world as far as I am concerned. It can only create a situation whereby countries continue to get afraid to attack each other but that is different from solving the reason behind a conflict.

If peace depends on both countries knowing that a war will destroy them, then  the peace is being maintained by fear rather than trust or cooperation. We need to know that one mistake or misunderstanding or de ion made my a reckless leader could lead that fear into a real war.

For me the absence of war is what gives peace because there is a difference between having peace and just being afraid of what will happen if the fighting starts

[BALIK]

I partly agree that a country possessing nuclear weapon can provide deterrence and reduce the risk of being invaded by other countries.

However, things could get much worse if more and more countries started acquiring them. It would create an arms race, and that is certainly not good for world peace. All it takes is one miscalculation or one moment of losing control by a single country. The consequence could drag the whole world into a nuclear war, which could mean the end of the Earth.

Having too many countries possess nuclear weapons would create more risk and harm than benefit for humanity.

That's true, I understand from your angle of reasoning. If too many countries power possess the nuclear weapon, it could likely fall into the hand of a fragile country and one single mistake will cause a lot of disaster. But in the same vein, if it remains in the hand of a few countries, they will continue to intimidate and threaten others.
The best approach could be a powerful check and balance. In order words, instead of thinking about the military and weapons war, countries should start thinking about the economic war which I think China is somehow leading at this time.

But then, be it economical war or military, the less powerful countries will still suffer it. The best thing to do is for countries to improve and strengthen their economy and defence.

Our world has never been truly fair, and it has always been a place where the strong bully the weak. This has been happening for thousands of years, not only between humans but also in nature and between different species. So it's hard to find a solution that can create a fair balance for everyone.

I think instead of countries constantly engaging in an arms race or turning to economic warfare, building a multipolar world could be a better way forward. When power is spread among multiple major power and smaller countries have the freedom to choose sides, it becomes harder for any single country to impose its will on the rest of the world.

That's why I don't expect China to replace the US. Instead, I hope China could help create a multipolar world.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Iran also has nuclear weapons, North Korea is also the same according to some articles.

Iran does not have nuclear weapons, and before the war, it had never intended to acquire them either. All rumors about them possessing nuclear weapons are merely baseless allegations and a pretext for the US to invade them.

If they had possessed nuclear weapons like North Korea, I don't think the US would ever have dared to attack the country.

Indeed, having too many countries possess these destructive weapons is a threat to the whole world. But when major powers keep abusing their power and bullying smaller countries, perhap I also support the idea that other countries should possess nuclear weapons. That may be the best way to restrain the aggression of major power and restore the global balance of power.

[Oluwa-btc]

Iran does not have nuclear weapons, and before the war, it had never intended to acquire them either. All rumors about them possessing nuclear weapons are merely baseless allegations and a pretext for the US to invade them.

If they had possessed nuclear weapons like North Korea, I don't think the US would ever have dared to attack the country.

Indeed, having too many countries possess these destructive weapons is a threat to the whole world. But when major powers keep abusing their power and bullying smaller countries, perhap I also support the idea that other countries should possess nuclear weapons. That may be the best way to restrain the aggression of major power and restore the global balance of power.

This is fact and according to the nuclear weapon inspections, they never had such plans until the last Supreme leader was killed by the joint airstrike of the isreali and American regime. I believe it is wise because, you can not kill my father, mother, brothers and friends and not expect me to be as ruthless as my enemy attempting to end me likewise. It should be the right decision if they think that way.

Lol, the nuclear weapon they have right now is the control over the strait of hormuz and they have decided to be in control for a very long time. It is somehow because Saudi Arabia can chase nuclear ambitions, Pakistan can have nuclear weapons but not Iran? This has got to be some laughable shit. Embarrasing!

[Smack That Ace]

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

I think OP and all of us are familiar with this famous quote from Albert Einstein. Clearly, he was referring to nuclear weapons, which the US dropped on two Japanese cities and killed hundreds of thousands of people.

Not to mention, nuclear weapons today are far more powerful and terrifying than they were back then, and a nuclear war today would be nothing like what the world witnessed in 1945. Therefore, using nuclear weapons to force countries to appreciate peace is an extremely dangerous gamble and simply not worth the tradeoff.

OP, what happen if it gets out of control? There may be no one left to learn that lesson. So in my opinion, it's a terrible idea.