Show "Banned from displaying signatures" in my profile. But why?

[Negotiation]

I actually wanted to know what kind of mistake could have caused this! I really can't figure out why this happened, can someone help me? What actually happened?

[ryzaadit]

Your answer in this thread: Signature Ban Appeal Q&A: read before appealing your sigban

The reasons are mostly:

Your ban was issued because your recent posting habits fall below forum standards of quality. Substandard posting habits considered in the decision to issue the ban include at least two of the following:

- Unoriginal or low effort replies, including inappropriate use of AI content.
- Repetitive, previously-expressed or generic comments that don’t add value or encourage conversation.
- Consistent burst posting (regularly writing posts less than 10 minutes apart).
- Off‑topic posting or shallow engagement (doesn't provide insight, analysis or perspective).
- Posting in principle for signature campaign payment and not for the sake of contributing actual discussion.

You can try to read & overview everything from the thread appeal since you don't know yet what actually happened regarding the Signature Ban.

[Rikafip]

In short, because you were spamming and shitposting for years.

And if you want to to get signature ban shortened (or not get banned again after the current one expires) you will have to change your posting quality significantly

[hd49728]

And if you want to to get signature ban shortened (or not get banned again after the current one expires) you will have to change your posting quality significantly

OP was banned by spamming and there is chance to remove the ban earlier than first given ban expiration date. OP needs to post with better quality and maintain it for a while like some weeks, months before asking an opportunity of early ban removal.

Using this page https://bitlist.co/analytics/sigbanned as an additional tool to know that OP belong to top active posters after given signature bans but it's certainly that post quality will be more important. If OP continue to post actively but still spam like before, no early ban removal will be given to his account.

Post quality resulted in the signature ban and the early signature removal will need considerable post quality improvement.

[PostQuantumBTC]

It is very easy to know what you were doing wrong, this is not the time that you have been posting like this and which you really need to change.

You were posting only on already long posts. The three that I took a look at were all beyond the 10 pages. What are you still discussing there? Stop it.

Be looking for new threads. There are tens of them daily.

[hd49728]

It is very easy to know what you were doing wrong, this is not the time that you have been posting like this and which you really need to change.

It's not easy if there is no message and information about the signature ban. Like with temporary or permanent ban, there is ban message of a ban. At least there is such ban message but the reasons can be generic while sometimes you can feel generic given reasons related to you, and that's enough.

With this signature ban, as far as I know, so far there is no such ban message.

People who were banned only can guess, if they don't know about the signature ban appeal thread in Meta board.
Signature ban appeal Q&A.

If possible, adding a ban message is better.

[SuperBitMan]

People who were banned only can guess, if they don't know about the signature ban appeal thread in Meta board.
Signature ban appeal Q&A.

If possible, adding a ban message is better.

Recently I have been seeing thread of signature ban users, asking why they were given a signature ban, this means they have not seen the signature ban thread that talks about this signature ban.

Yeah, sending a signature ban message to anyone that has ban, and the reason for the ban should be contained in the message will help reduce the number of thread being created here in meta board to ask the reason why they are given a signature ban.

[hd49728]

Recently I have been seeing thread of signature ban users, asking why they were given a signature ban, this means they have not seen the signature ban thread that talks about this signature ban.

Yeah, sending a signature ban message to anyone that has ban, and the reason for the ban should be contained in the message will help reduce the number of thread being created here in meta board to ask the reason why they are given a signature ban.

When I read this

Hello!

If you are the recipient of a recent signature ban and would like to appeal it, please read this post before making your appeal.

Your ban was issued because your recent posting habits fall below forum standards of quality. Substandard posting habits considered in the decision to issue the ban include at least two of the following:

I believe that there was no message about the signature ban sent to users.

If there will be any message in the future, I suggest to add a link to that Signature ban appeal Q&A like if you want to appeal, please read this following thread, and create your appeal thread in Meta board.

[Lucius]

~snip~
I actually wanted to know what kind of mistake could have caused this! I really can't figure out why this happened, can someone help me? What actually happened?

When you're so busy spamming that you're not even aware of what's going on in the forum... You haven't even bothered to read a single thread here on Meta, because obviously you don't read because it's a waste of time.

By the way, you've been on the most famous spam list since 2021, and as things stand, karma has finally caught up with you.

[PostQuantumBTC]

If possible, adding a ban message is better.

There is a thread about users signature will be banned, but there are some people that are not following the thread? That is very bad of them is what I can say about it.

There is also a thread for the lists of people that are already banned, it is better everyone is following the thread and see the way those people are posting that is causing the ban.

[nutildah]

You've been signatured banned for repeated low quality posting, which is in your case, over a period of several years. As others have suggested, your post quality fails to meet basic standards mentioned in this topic.

You've had 252 posts deleted by moderators, which puts you in the top 200 of users with most deleted posts of all-time. You earned 300 merits across 5300 total posts. Both of these things combined suggests your posts aren't appreciated by moderators or other forum members.

Below is a recent example of an unnecessary post, and most of your posts seem to fall in this category:

I agree with you that those who use leverage have a lot of funds. Still, for beginners it is very difficult to manage it and trade by combining all these technical and fundamental factors. Still, those who are old and experienced can profit from it at any time and no matter what the market is like, they are able to profit.

You're not really saying anything here beyond "I agree with you". Even if we present what you're saying in the best possible light, its not anything that hasn't been said here ten thousand times before.

I can understand it may seem unfair. However, making a living through the practice of writing "I agree with you" or surface-level posts that weren't meant to be read by other people shouldn't be encouraged in the first place.

[Justbillywitt]

Recently I have been seeing thread of signature ban users, asking why they were given a signature ban, this means they have not seen the signature ban thread that talks about this signature ban.

Yeah, sending a signature ban message to anyone that has ban, and the reason for the ban should be contained in the message will help reduce the number of thread being created here in meta board to ask the reason why they are given a signature ban.

But don’t you think it’s wrong for someone to be visiting the forum for days, weeks and months without checking the meta board to know the latest developments regarding the forum? How can you be in a place without caring to know what’s the recent happening, you only remember there is a place called meta when you have problem. In my opinion no messages should be sent. Forum users should normalize visiting meta board frequently, even if they don’t contribute to the discussions there, at least they will read from what’s been discussed and get firsthand information and work with it.

[promise444c5]

But don’t you think it’s wrong for someone to be visiting the forum for days, weeks and months without checking the meta board to know the latest developments regarding the forum?

No it’s not.. but if you’re a regular user of the forum and earning through the forum at the same time[like Op].. i don’t see any reason why not to visit the meta at least once in a week .

Those that are only here to find answers to something or visit the forum just to get updates about Bitcoin itself .. usually do not have any business with meta unless they just feel like checking.
There are also those that are only interested in a specific aspect of the forum.

Guests, generally have zero reasons to visit the meta board unless they are looking for a particular info but they are still welcome because it’s accessible to everyone .

[Negotiation]

I can understand it may seem unfair. However, making a living through the practice of writing "I agree with you" or surface-level posts that weren't meant to be read by other people shouldn't be encouraged in the first place.

Well, I will try my best to correct my mistakes. Thank you for pointing out my mistakes.