Stake Engine - The Future of IGaming Industry ?

[ashmodeus]

i am sorry before if there is similiar topic or i post in the wrong section.
Anyway, have u heard Stake Engine before ? why its seems important to IGaming insdustry ? usually In traditional iGaming, building a slot game requires massive upfront capital,expensive server infrastructure, complex regulatory approvals,and the sad part's is large commission cuts, and from that reason Stake wanted to create an "App Store for Casino Games." By offering an open platform, indie creators and small studios can bypass publishers, build games using Stake’s SDK, and deploy titles directly to players. Important part is stake dare to use competitive payout model—offering developers a straightforward 10% Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) share, its huge diffrence since mostly independent developer get underpaid by aggregators or work on flat-rate contracts for larger game studios.

How about the game and people interest ?
since the payout its totally huge as f*ck, that bring skilled developers to build high-quality games exclusively for the Stake platform.honestly i've heard about stake engine since last year, but the real stake engine using their new mechanism which it using pre-determined system(provably fair) about feb this year. well, the reason behind why this is important because mostly stake engine using provably fair system instead of " Black Box Trust Model which it You cannot manually verify your spin. You have to blind-trust that the third-party auditor and the casino are running the RNG software fairly. Result and people interest ?


this is the most knowing game of all time, with total wager 7.8 billion's USD (statistic based only on playing at stake)


and this is the most playing game who created by using stake engine it self which already wagered almost 6 billion's USD under 1 year.
As u can see , the interest for new kind of era on slot machine is quite high, despite mostly come from streamer or content creator , i personally choose stake engine mecanism instead a traditional one.

[Swordsoffreedom]

hmm, Stake Engine is interesting for developers compared to any traditional iGaming model.

To me, the real innovation of Stake Engine is the combination of distribution, infrastructure & incentives. If you are small developer, and you got the opportunity to launch a game without having to build servers, audiences, distribution and massive infrastructure by your own. Then the entry barrier for your project will be really low. However ultimately the market will decide which games will survive. Just 10% GGR or being provably fair does not guarantee a game is successful.

[ashmodeus]

Believe me buddy , 10%GGR its totally huge , i dont think if u work to pragmatic or hacksaw they will give same , instead they will put u to a small fix payment. And well , based what i view, mostly about which game will hype or survive depend on content creator , since about what i know mostly newly creator game will not pay X amount of money to streamer to promote their game, and well , pragmatic or hacksaw probably do that shady aggrement for some streamer. Beside that , well it depend gamble nature.

[Russlenat]

This is the good news...  "10% GGR perpetual royalties"/..

Since Stake is already a huge casino, I think many developers will be interested in creating games for them because that kind of reward is very attractive.

Just imagine if your game starts making millions and you get 10% of that on a monthly basis, and it continues as long as the game keeps earning. Thats a very good incentive for developers.

For me, its also a smart strategy instead of just paying developers a fixed amount. They make it a win-win situation where Stake gets new games while the developers also continue earning if their game becomes successful.

[DrBeer]

A pretty predictable decision! Well done!
If there’s demand for a high-tech product whose production can be "automated", why not? Consumers get the opportunity to get started quickly, without huge costs. And here’s the thing, those huge costs might never pay off. Essentially, this is GaaS (Gaming as a Service) - highly customizable, affordable, and quick to bring to market.

[ashmodeus]

This is the good news...  "10% GGR perpetual royalties"/..

Since Stake is already a huge casino, I think many developers will be interested in creating games for them because that kind of reward is very attractive.

Just imagine if your game starts making millions and you get 10% of that on a monthly basis, and it continues as long as the game keeps earning. Thats a very good incentive for developers.

For me, its also a smart strategy instead of just paying developers a fixed amount. They make it a win-win situation where Stake gets new games while the developers also continue earning if their game becomes successful.

Yep, u not wrong heard it, 10% every 1st of the month. Since its pure no third party , i mean its just stake and the game developer, stake get new bags for their pocket, dev got profit for the bags they created. That why varlkrye people become rich suddenly, since their game has reached the top of stake popular game, and just by the time only their 1st game will become the biggest wagered slot game on stake. Eventhough they guaranted rich , well , they keep continue since they absolutely know this will not last forever, and u know what the new things which it probably big dev not gonna do, they keep adding such as chalenge with 0.01usd bet or higher to get massive reward, both on their website or on the casino, and lets guess what ? Many many devs do the same things , double of user winning,put some chalenge,raffle. For user or player its totally double win. I wouldn't supprise if they giving sum X amount of money to their player, considering their revenue on their game its totally huge. I will suprise if big provider do the same thing.

[CryptoBuds]

and this is the most playing game who created by using stake engine it self which already wagered almost 6 billion's USD under 1 year.

Believe me buddy , 10%GGR its totally huge , i dont think if u work to pragmatic or hacksaw they will give same , instead they will put u to a small fix payment.

At launch last year, Stake said that Stake Engine games generated around $3B in turnover in last 12 month. Now I can see that their official dashboard shows platform-wide turnover of over $17B and around 2109 live games. This is really cool.

However I would also be a little cautious about 10% GGR meaning that developers are automatically getting a huge deal. Even if GGR is revenue share but development cost, team salaries, taxes, compliance, failed games, etc. will be excluded from the developer's actual profit. And we cannot call "turnover" is actual revenue or profit. $6B wager sounds enormous when you hear it. But it does not directly indicate how much money the developer actually earned with it.

[YOSHIE]

Anyway, have u heard Stake Engine before ? why its seems important to IGaming insdustry ?

If that's what you are asking, I have seen in one of the posts written by @Pavlo Agoshkov, I think your question matches what was written in one of these posts.

Posting Pavlo Agoshkov

Point, actually it doesn't seem important for the IGaming industry, the market shift that triggered the Stake Engine to rise to the top, so it seems that the IGaming industry prioritizes and is very important to promote the Stake Engine.

This situation cannot be separated from the influence of the very large Stake casino, which makes Stake Engine fly high.

[Alex077]

well, the reason behind why this is important because mostly stake engine using provably fair system instead of "" Black Box Trust Model which it You cannot manually verify your spin. You have to blind-trust that the third-party auditor and the casino are running the RNG software fairly.

Your analysis is really interesting. I learned a lot.

But my most important correction is about provably fair. Just being provably fair does not make any game mathematically fair or any game with good EV. Provably fair basically gives you opportunity to verify outcome manipulation. But RTP or house edge of that game is different matter here. Again even though provably fair gives you round level verification but it alone will not prove whether the advertised odds or  entire implementation is correct.

Another interesting point is that I saw that Stake Engine games use static outcome files. Where possible outcomes, probability and payout multiplier will be defined. And the outcome will be selected according to simulation weighting in betting round. So I think it should not be called a "completely trustless casino out of the black box." Those who will work with it should first take a good look at its implementation and verification mechanism.

[ashmodeus]

And we cannot call "turnover" is actual revenue or profit. $6B wager sounds enormous when you hear it. But it does not directly indicate how much money the developer actually earned with it.

yeah , i knew it, i just try to compare the shark with the fish, and somehow the fish getting bigger more than people imagine.

Anyway, have u heard Stake Engine before ? why its seems important to IGaming insdustry ?

If that's what you are asking, I have seen in one of the posts written by @Pavlo Agoshkov, I think your question matches what was written in one of these posts.

Posting Pavlo Agoshkov

Point, actually it doesn't seem important for the IGaming industry, the market shift that triggered the Stake Engine to rise to the top, so it seems that the IGaming industry prioritizes and is very important to promote the Stake Engine.

This situation cannot be separated from the influence of the very large Stake casino, which makes Stake Engine fly high.

ahhhh, his explanation kind of answered my question of some view,and now i've thinking stake want to be the first casino to lead casino operator to becoming a core technology platform on IGaming industry. Yeah , despite stake have everything right now, its just matter of time till people feel bored with big dev game,which it mostly as my view as a player just a re-skins game. Somehow stake created new era of Igaming. a simple concept with hashed seed which every game have individual client and server seed to easly verify each bet, well that kinda cool tbh.

well, the reason behind why this is important because mostly stake engine using provably fair system instead of "" Black Box Trust Model which it You cannot manually verify your spin. You have to blind-trust that the third-party auditor and the casino are running the RNG software fairly.

Your analysis is really interesting. I learned a lot.

But my most important correction is about provably fair. Just being provably fair does not make any game mathematically fair or any game with good EV. Provably fair basically gives you opportunity to verify outcome manipulation. But RTP or house edge of that game is different matter here. Again even though provably fair gives you round level verification but it alone will not prove whether the advertised odds or  entire implementation is correct.

Another interesting point is that I saw that Stake Engine games use static outcome files. Where possible outcomes, probability and payout multiplier will be defined. And the outcome will be selected according to simulation weighting in betting round. So I think it should not be called a "completely trustless casino out of the black box." Those who will work with it should first take a good look at its implementation and verification mechanism.

well, i like ur opinion, if we put RTP and house edge on the menu, based on math , there is no better from both of them, neither stake engine or casual RNG such as prag. let me explain about my view.
lets try create a game , lets say hunting fish, and put that game on 2 diffrent engine, one is from stake and another on casual engine. now, let 200 people play on that game, 100 each both side, and based on my theory here is the diffrence.
people who play with stake engine have 100 random seed which every seed has been settled before they play which it it cant be changed after seed created,and for the last 100 people have Real-Time State Machine (Dynamic RNG) , which it probably can change as the Variable per casino operator (RTP ranges) can go up or down anytime.

[Hispo]

Honestly, I had learnt about Stake engine months ago and I knew it was going to be an interesting experiment on this industry, but I never imagined it would become so significant in a relatively short period of time within Stake.
So far it seems their economical experiment to attract developers to their platform is working and eventually we will see more provably fair games on there.

It makes me wonder whether other casinos (big ones) will also move onto developing their own engines with a similar business model.