About my sigban

[Jossque]

Dear BitcoinTalk community, first of all, I think there’s a major misunderstanding here.
I’d like to clarify that I don’t use artificial intelligence. I have absolutely no connection to AI—I’d like to prove this to nutildah, so if you can show me a way, please do. I think you’re casting suspicion on people.

I first contacted him privately, and he provided me with some information. I thank him, and there are some points I agree with.
You’re right about the soccer match summaries—yes, most of my posts are about soccer match summaries and game results. I’d like to say that I’ll be more careful about this in the future, but I don’t think I deserve such a severe punishment.

We need to find a middle ground. Fine, punish me—I have no objection to that. You want to make the forum a better and more interesting place—I can’t argue with that; you’re doing the right thing—but I find the punishment imposed on me to be very, very harsh. First of all, I’d like to reiterate that I truly did not use artificial intelligence and don’t even have an account on any AI program.

I know you’re under a lot of pressure and have an important job to do. Some people might think badly of you, and others are bombarding you with criticism. Whether rightly or wrongly, this task has been assigned to you, and you’re trying your best, but I don’t think you can resolve this issue by handing out such severe penalties.

As I said, I am willing to accept my punishment. If a mistake was made and I had difficulty realizing it, that is my fault. However, while I do not agree with the accusations, I hope Nutildah will show some flexibility on this matter.

I hope everything goes smoothly. Best regards.

[TryNinja]

You said you contacted him privately, and your post feels like a reply to his PM, but you posted this publicly for some reason? Or did he ask you to create a new thread?

[Jossque]

You said you contacted him privately, and your post feels like a reply to his PM, but you posted this publicly for some reason? Or did he ask you to create a new thread?

Yes, since he said he would respond, I can say that I brought up the topic by slightly modifying my private message.

[nutildah]

I’d like to reiterate that I truly did not use artificial intelligence and don’t even have an account on any AI program.

I'm just curious why the AI detectors say differently. Is there something I'm not accounting for that could explain this?

Although Karabakh lost the first leg 1-0 to Dynamo Kyiv, they managed to advance to the next round by winning the home match 2-0. It wouldn’t be wrong to say that both teams created the same number of scoring opportunities, but we can clearly state that Karabakh won the match thanks to their home-field advantage. Karabakh took the lead with a goal in the 12th minute and secured the win with a goal by Kashchuk in the second half.
FC Nordsjaelland rained goals down on Valur and advanced to the next round. Valur was already a weak opponent for them, and they managed to put pressure on their opponent from the very first minutes. With the first half ending 2-0, FC Nordsjaelland scored three more goals in the second half, defeating their opponent 5-0 and advancing from the Conference League.

Sapling: 100% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

Cruzeiro managed to defeat Chapecoense at home and advanced to the next round. The home team, which scored toward the end of the first half and went into halftime leading 1-0, virtually dominated the match after their opponent was reduced to 10 men. Since Cruzeiro had drawn 0-0 in the first leg on the road, they gained the upper hand after scoring the goal. Cruzeiro continued to apply pressure in the second half and scored another goal to win the match 2-0.
Fortaleza failed to advance despite defeating Palmeiras 3-2 at home. Palmeiras had come into this away match with an advantage after winning the first leg 3-0 at home. Fortaleza led 2-1 at halftime but failed to apply sufficient pressure in the second half, and the match ended 3-2. Palmeiras didn’t play poorly, but they still lost.

Sapling: 100% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

Not to mention, all your English posts follow the same 2-paragraph format, although sometimes you combine the 2 paragraphs together.

In the opening match of the week, Galatasaray faced Samsunspor at home. It must be said that it was a match that caused controversy with every decision. Samsunspor's position, especially in the final minutes, clearly warranted a penalty, but it was not given, causing a huge uproar on social media. The President of Samsunspor also made a statement on the matter. I am eagerly awaiting to see what course of action the Turkish Football Federation (TFF) will take. Had that penalty been awarded, Samsunspor could have secured a point away from home, but now they leave empty-handed, while Galatasaray continues on its way with three points.

Sapling: 100% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

You've been doing this for a long time and are definitely using some kind of automated tool to produce these summaries.

Some people might think badly of you, and others are bombarding you with criticism.

That's an unfortunately narrow range of responses. I will try to do better. Maybe I can work my way up to "they don't hate all of it" someday.

[Jossque]

I’d like to reiterate that I truly did not use artificial intelligence and don’t even have an account on any AI program.

I'm just curious why the AI detectors say differently. Is there something I'm not accounting for that could explain this?

Although Karabakh lost the first leg 1-0 to Dynamo Kyiv, they managed to advance to the next round by winning the home match 2-0. It wouldn’t be wrong to say that both teams created the same number of scoring opportunities, but we can clearly state that Karabakh won the match thanks to their home-field advantage. Karabakh took the lead with a goal in the 12th minute and secured the win with a goal by Kashchuk in the second half.
FC Nordsjaelland rained goals down on Valur and advanced to the next round. Valur was already a weak opponent for them, and they managed to put pressure on their opponent from the very first minutes. With the first half ending 2-0, FC Nordsjaelland scored three more goals in the second half, defeating their opponent 5-0 and advancing from the Conference League.

Sapling: 100% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

Cruzeiro managed to defeat Chapecoense at home and advanced to the next round. The home team, which scored toward the end of the first half and went into halftime leading 1-0, virtually dominated the match after their opponent was reduced to 10 men. Since Cruzeiro had drawn 0-0 in the first leg on the road, they gained the upper hand after scoring the goal. Cruzeiro continued to apply pressure in the second half and scored another goal to win the match 2-0.
Fortaleza failed to advance despite defeating Palmeiras 3-2 at home. Palmeiras had come into this away match with an advantage after winning the first leg 3-0 at home. Fortaleza led 2-1 at halftime but failed to apply sufficient pressure in the second half, and the match ended 3-2. Palmeiras didn’t play poorly, but they still lost.

Sapling: 100% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

Not to mention, all your English posts follow the same 2-paragraph format, although sometimes you combine the 2 paragraphs together.

In the opening match of the week, Galatasaray faced Samsunspor at home. It must be said that it was a match that caused controversy with every decision. Samsunspor's position, especially in the final minutes, clearly warranted a penalty, but it was not given, causing a huge uproar on social media. The President of Samsunspor also made a statement on the matter. I am eagerly awaiting to see what course of action the Turkish Football Federation (TFF) will take. Had that penalty been awarded, Samsunspor could have secured a point away from home, but now they leave empty-handed, while Galatasaray continues on its way with three points.

Sapling: 100% Fake
ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT

You've been doing this for a long time and are definitely using some kind of automated tool to produce these summaries.

Some people might think badly of you, and others are bombarding you with criticism.

That's an unfortunately narrow range of responses. I will try to do better. Maybe I can work my way up to "they don't hate all of it" someday.

I understand that you’re only running your comments through the AI detectors you’ve chosen. Have you tried any of the others?

I’m also testing the messages you provided as examples on AI detector websites, but the result is always the same: 0%.

https://turnitin.app/
https://app.gptzero.me/
https://copyleaks.com/ai-detector

[nutildah]

The chances of there being 2 false positives on any given piece of text are extremely slim. The fact that two detectors reported the posts as 100% AI on 3 of your posts (and likely several more) strongly suggests that you are using AI.

Even on the off chance that you aren't, how do you explain why your English posts always follow the same format and are of similar lengths? Its very unnatural for a personal writing structure.

Let's say you're not using AI, for the sake of argument. Well, you're always posting 1 thing: football summaries. That's literally the only thing you do outside of your local board activities. These aren't unique, creative summaries but rather basic recaps devoid of personality. They read like news service summaries, and its hard to say that people appreciate them as you've only ever received 1 merit in Gambling Discussion... that's in 2,003 posts on that board.

So whether you're using AI or not is irrelevant to your sigban, although really according to the AI guidelines you should be fully banned, IMO.

You're never supposed to be posting "slop" of any kind, whether AI-generated or not. If moderators look at someone's posts and think, "This person is just posting garbage to inflate their post count," then that person should be banned, regardless of the source of the garbage *.

[Jossque]

I don’t know why you don’t want to understand—the AI Detectors you chose are at 100%, while others remain at 0%. Can you explain to me what’s causing this difference?

I’ve stated many times—even privately—that I don’t use AI. Why would I use AI here while writing the match summary and updates? I always follow the same format because I haven’t received any warnings from the petition campaign manager. If I do receive a warning from the manager, I can adjust my approach accordingly.

I don’t think there’s a problem with my activity on the local forum, but I don’t understand why sharing a match summary is exactly the issue. Don’t I have that freedom in the gambling section? If so, shouldn’t there be some rules established for the gambling section? After all, I’m not doing anything against the rules.

Are there many posts in the gambling section that people appreciate? Can you show me some examples?

You’re still claiming in your last paragraph that I’m using AI, but I’m stating that I’m not. Why does the result come back as 0% when you run the messages you quoted through different AI detectors?

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Are there many posts in the gambling section that people appreciate? Can you show me some examples?

This is the rubbish you are littering the forum with. You are not quoting anyone, you are not engaging in conversation, you are just posting in mega gambling threads following the same pattern. So, let's see if people can appreciate.







When you only post like that you deserve a signature ban. But that is just my opinion, let's hear others appreciations.

[Jossque]

Is it required to quote other messages?

[FinneysTrueVision]

You are writing posts that all look exactly the same, often with very short intervals between them. It certainly looks like some sort of automated writing to the naked eye. Once checked with some reliable detectors, Originality and Pangram, you do have multiple posts that are detected as being AI generated or AI assisted. That includes the appeal post you made here, which is probably enhanced by AI.

It might not be straightforward copy and pasting from a chatbot, but there are enough signs to believe it isn’t genuine human writing.

I thank him, and there are some points I agree with.
You’re right about the soccer match summaries—yes, most of my posts are about soccer match summaries and game results. I’d like to say that I’ll be more careful about this in the future, but I don’t think I deserve such a severe punishment.

If even in your own very biased opinion, you are in agreement with the primary reason why you received a signature ban, I don’t see how anyone could object to the decision. You might be better off trying to improve your posting over the course of the next several months and then make your appeal for a reduced punishment.  

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Is it required to quote other messages?

It is required, what?

The gist of your story is that you’ve been shitposting on the forum, getting paid for it, and now that you’ve received a well-deserved signature ban, you’re coming here to protest with arguments that don’t hold water. What you should do, if you had any dignity, is lock this thread and start posting decently on the forum—even if you’re not getting paid—to see if your signature ban can be lifted. But insisting that you received an unfair ban is nothing more than making a fool of yourself.

[snipie]

The problem with the texts above is their length which can explain partially why it was flagged as AI.
The content is more human than a bot but doesn't sound very human. I believe you are using AI from Google Search or other way. It gives you a summary then you reformulate it by yourself or humanise it with the same or another tool. It is not that obvious without seeing the pattern.

[Jossque]

Is it required to quote other messages?

It is required, what?

The gist of your story is that you’ve been shitposting on the forum, getting paid for it, and now that you’ve received a well-deserved signature ban, you’re coming here to protest with arguments that don’t hold water. What you should do, if you had any dignity, is lock this thread and start posting decently on the forum—even if you’re not getting paid—to see if your signature ban can be lifted. But insisting that you received an unfair ban is nothing more than making a fool of yourself.

There’s no need for you to be rude.

This thread was started here precisely to discuss this matter sensibly; if you call me “dishonorable,” you’re twisting the issue, and I’ll have no choice but to respond in kind. Be respectful so we can have a sensible conversation.

The problem with the texts above is their length which can explain partially why it was flagged as AI.
The content is more human than a bot but doesn't sound very human. I believe you are using AI from Google Search or other way. It gives you a summary then you reformulate it by yourself or humanise it with the same or another tool. It is not that obvious without seeing the pattern.

None of my messages were generated by AI. If you say it might be perceived that way because the message is long, I can agree, but I can still say that I didn’t generate it with AI. If an app like Turnitin says it’s 0% AI, I think we should look for the problem elsewhere.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

There’s no need for you to be rude.

There is no need for you to shitpost the forum and present yourself as the victim either. Also, there is no need to break the forum rules in this same thread by posting two posts in a row and there is no need to lie when you say this:

if you call me “dishonorable,”

We've seen this same story play out here before. By the way, how did you manage to earn so many merits with such shitposting?

[libert19]

Well, this is bit out of ordinary, let's just say: https://talkimg.com/image/U4DzAw

[Jossque]

There’s no need for you to be rude.

There is no need for you to shitpost the forum and present yourself as the victim either. Also, there is no need to break the forum rules in this same thread by posting two posts in a row and there is no need to lie when you say this:

if you call me “dishonorable,”

We've seen this same story play out here before. By the way, how did you manage to earn so many merits with such shitposting?

They're all related to the projects and airdrops I've shared