Looks like there are already several tools created by forum members. I have developed a new one, which compiles information from them.
https://cinexacode.fun/forum-dossierJust enter a username, user ID or profile URL. No account or login needed. It's free.
Credit first, because none of this data is mineThe system does not scrape forum data or maintain its own cache. Instead, it queries public services that are maintained and managed by other individuals:
- BitList / Ninjastic (TryNinja) - post history, merit records, addresses mentioned.
- BPIP (ibminer, suchmoon) - activity, trust, recognition, and merit scores and ranks, number of flags.
- loyce.club (LoyceV) - banned user IDs, DT1 pipeline, merit history.
- bitcointalk.org - the amount of positive feedback reported about a user.
Each item displayed links back to the source of the information so you can double check it. If you are the operator of any of the aforementioned services, and prefer I don't query it in this manner, you can contact me, and I will adjust or cease my requests.
What the data containsFive summary cards will display: number of archived posts, number of merits received and sent, as well as the number of BTC addresses (both total and shared).
Thereafter, there are eight tabs which you can access: Top Boards, Top Threads, Senders of Merits, Receivers of Merits, Recent Posts, BTC Addresses, Links to Addresses, and BPIP / Trust score. Top Boards and Top Threads statistics can be filtered according to their most recent 30 days, 90 days, or all time activity.
There is additionally a straightforward summary with one caution level (None major/Use at your own caution/High caution) and details the exact causes behind it. All reported criteria are verifiable as only the number of accounts flagged by Loyce, the redness of the BPIP trust colored indicator, number of negative feedback marks, and actual active BPIP flags are included. "Copy Summary" can generate a copy-pasteble version for you. There are no hidden scores or arbitrary metrics within the caution system.
Regarding the shared addresses information-the main controversial aspect of this toolThe 'Links to Addresses' tab shows, when they appear. The information presented here is deliberately narrowly focused because it can be quite erroneous otherwise. It displays a shared address if it appears in one of these sources:
Same as how Bitlist filters it. Reputation is excluded outright, because addresses get quoted there constantly and they belong to whoever is being discussed, not to the person posting.
Without that filter you get a flood of noise: quoted scam reports, donation addresses copied from someone's signature, addresses pasted into a discussion. The filter is why LoyceV's dossier shows 5 shared addresses out of 13,064 address mentions rather than hundreds of meaningless "links".
To be clear about what this does not mean: two accounts posting the same address is not proof of alts, and I do not treat it as one. There are ordinary reasons for it - the same escrow, a shared campaign manager, a deposit address at the same service, someone quoting a payment. It is deliberately kept out of the caution score entirely and is shown as information only. Draw your own conclusions, and look at the linked posts before you draw any.
Technical notes- Nothing about your lookup goes into a database. There is no account system and no search history. Results are cached for 45 minutes to avoid hammering the upstream APIs, and there is a refresh option if you need current data.
- Lookups are rate limited to 20 per minute so this cannot be turned into a scraper aimed at someone else's service.
- If you script things, there is a JSON endpoint
POST https://cinexacode.fun/api/v1/forum/dossier
Content-Type: application/json
{"query": "LoyceV"}
Same 20/minute limit. Returns the full dossier as JSON.
Seeking your inputPlease start off by checking it with your own account. Since you know exactly whether it’s true, you’ll be quick to spot mistakes.
More specifically I am looking for information on:
- Anything which may have been reported to be incorrect about your account
- If the caution classification often fails and seems incorrect
- Instances where "Links to Addresses," despite the filters I have provided, have reported bogus shared address figures
- Anything you expected to find in the reports but ended up missing entirely
Post it here and I will fix it. A few other Bitcoin tools live at
https://cinexacode.fun/tools if you want a look around.
Note:
This post is drafted by my AI agent, which I modified and posted. 
