Touki Blockchain (TOUKI) — an EVM Layer-1 built for creators: how it compares to Ethereum, BNB Chain and Solana
Hello Bitcointalk,
I am posting an honest technical comparison of
Touki Blockchain against the three chains most creators consider today. I will not hide the weak points — they are listed at the end.
What Touki isTouki Blockchain is a live, EVM-compatible Layer-1 running Proof of Authority.
- Chain ID: 2105 (0x839)
- Native coin: TOUKI, 18 decimals
- Supply: 73,971,571 TOUKI, fixed at genesis — no inflation, no minting function
- Gas: fixed 1 gwei by network configuration — a transfer costs 0.000021 TOUKI
- Node: written in Rust, proposer-signed blocks, P2P handshake/gossip/range sync
- Tooling: no-code token and NFT creation from the browser, explorer with contract verification, public RPC, MetaMask one-click add
Current on-chain state (verifiable in the explorer): ~124,895 blocks, ~49,332 transactions, ~23,013 accounts, 61 tokens and NFT collections deployed by 41 distinct creator addresses.
Comparison| | Touki | Ethereum | BNB Chain | Solana |
| Consensus | Proof of Authority | Proof of Stake | Proof of Staked Authority | PoS + Proof of History |
| VM / language | EVM, Solidity | EVM, Solidity | EVM, Solidity | SVM, Rust/Anchor |
| Fee model | Fixed 1 gwei | Market-priced, volatile | Market-priced, low | Very low, market-priced |
| Typical transfer cost | 0.000021 TOUKI | cents to dollars | ~a few cents | a fraction of a cent |
| Validator set | Small — see weaknesses | ~1,000,000+ validators | Tens of validators | ~1,000+ validators |
| Decentralisation | Low today | Very high | Medium | High |
| No-code issuance in the core ecosystem | Yes, native | Third-party dApps only | Third-party dApps only | Third-party dApps only |
| Supply policy | Fixed 73,971,571 | Variable (burn/issuance) | Deflationary via burns | Inflationary schedule |
| Wallet/tooling compatibility | Standard EVM (MetaMask, Hardhat, Foundry, ethers) | Native | Native | Separate stack |
Figures for Ethereum, BNB Chain and Solana are approximate public values and move with network conditions; check them yourself before quoting me.Where Touki actually differsFee predictability instead of fee competition. Gas is a fixed network parameter, so a creator can price a mint or a loyalty transfer today and the same cost holds tomorrow. Micro-value products — in-game economies, education pilots, points — stay viable in a way they do not when gas spikes.
No-code issuance is part of the chain's own ecosystem, not an external dApp charging its own margin. A creator fills a browser form (supply, decimals, mintable, burnable, pausable) and the contract deploys to mainnet. A Solidity developer can ignore all of that and deploy the normal way over standard JSON-RPC.
Zero switching cost. It is plain EVM: MetaMask, Hardhat, Foundry, ethers.js, Etherscan-style verification. Nothing new to learn, unlike moving to Solana's stack.
Touki is not trying to beat Solana on throughput or Ethereum on decentralisation. It competes on accessibility and cost predictability for the creator economy, on proven EVM rails.
Starting price / public sale- Public sale price: 0.20 USDT per TOUKI
- Fixed supply: 73,971,571 TOUKI — implied fully-diluted valuation at sale price: ~14.8M USDT
- No inflation, no team minting function; the supply was set at genesis
- Exchange listing target: 1 November 2026 — subject to exchange approval, not confirmed
Weaknesses — stated plainly- Validator decentralisation: the protocol supports a multi-validator set with deterministic proposer rotation and signed blocks, but independent validators run by third parties are not onboarded yet. Today Touki is far more centralised than any chain in the table above. Observed block times are currently around 30 seconds; the 3-second target needs the additional validators.
- No third-party security audit yet. The node and the no-code contract templates have not been audited by an external firm. Until they are, treat the code as unaudited.
- Treasury controls: project addresses are not yet under multisig with a published vesting schedule. This is being fixed and it is fair to ask for proof before it is claimed.
- No confirmed exchange listing and no bridge to major chains yet. Liquidity is limited to the project's own sale channel.
I would rather post these here myself than have someone discover them and conclude the project was hiding them. Each item will only be announced as done when it is verifiable on-chain or by an audit report.
LinksTechnical questions welcome — including hostile ones about the validator set. I will answer them in this thread.
Not financial advice. Digital assets are volatile and you can lose your capital. No return, liquidity or exchange listing is promised.
