KycNotList.com Admin Scam XHash Deposit

[iagomsp]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579256.msg67077052#msg67077052

i am using kycnotlist few month. Always change through top exchanges like dex and bitkarm
i was scammed yesterday by xhash.cash, one of the top of exchangers with $10k deposit.
Claims against xhash from other users started from July accorting to topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5588810.msg66956583#msg66956583 Problems start month ago and no reaction on this...
So i understand kycnotlist didnt take any measures so we get result so me and another user from kycnotlist got scammed in August. So sad.
Beware that kycnotlist dont properly monitor their exchangers and you will get exit scammed when making huge exchange. I am waiting for reply from kycnotlist to get more information what happened


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579256.msg67080125#msg67080125

I received a refund from my deposit from the NoKycList administration. The situation has been clarified; thank you to the site’s administration for their quick response and for resolving the issue. They are very attentive to user feedback and are genuinely committed to improving their site.


Please be cautious when dealing with the KYCnotlist admin. Admin got a deposit from XHash by creating a fake scam case and awarding the funds to himself.

This happened after Trevoid publicly claimed that XHash had previously scammed users on the forum. The KYCnotlist admin then reportedly treated the deposit as payment for a fake scam report. Based on these circumstances, I believe users should not trust the KycNotList.com admin and should conduct their own research before sending him any money.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579256.msg67077869#msg67077869

[Jogras]

Kycnotlist's monitoring service has not behaved entirely honestly from the very beginning. On the Russian Bits Media forum, as far back as May 7, 2026, a user named saylor22 caught Kycnotlist publishing fake reviews. As one would expect from a supposedly reliable service, the Kycnotlist administrator blamed an inexperienced moderator. They also assured users that it would not happen again. Source:

Code:

https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/topic/2128174-kycnotlistcom-%E2%80%94-%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2-no-kyc-no-aml/#findComment-2505533

However, I recently decided to post a fake review on the Kycnotlist website as well. I wrote a review for the exchanger ComCash because their reviews are repetitive and appear to be fabricated. Here is the fake review that was approved: https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/09/10/Ue0fI5.png

Archive link: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/ycHwL

It can be concluded that the administrator continues to publish fake reviews, misleading users. At the same time, this appears to be done selectively and, in my opinion, possibly by prior arrangement. Fake reviews are not published for everyone. If you browse through the listings, you may notice that some well-known exchangers have 0 reviews, while lesser-known ones sometimes have more than 10.

If you check the website's backlinks, you can also find that the administrator is actively involved in Dark Web-related activities and has several threads on various hacking forums.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/09/10/Ue05Hf.png

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/09/10/Ue07sZ.png

The vast majority of exchangers listed on Kycnotlist have deposits on darknet forums. It is unclear what this offers ordinary users who do not use these hacking forums. If they get scammed, they would need to create an account there, contribute to the forum's database, or risk being scammed again on the forum itself.

Kycnotlist's reputation is highly questionable.

[hugeblack]

Thanks for sharing these tips. Generally, your points are valid, but they aren't sufficient grounds to distrust the service or add negative trust.

Please be cautious when dealing with the KYCnotlist admin. Admin got a deposit from XHash by creating a fake scam case and awarding the funds to himself.

Could you provide more details? I couldn't find a link to verify this.

The vast majority of exchangers listed on Kycnotlist have deposits on darknet forums. It is unclear what this offers ordinary users who do not use these hacking forums. If they get scammed, they would need to create an account there, contribute to the forum's database, or risk being scammed again on the forum itself.

That is a good point;

[logfiles]

Please be cautious when dealing with the KYCnotlist admin. Admin got a deposit from XHash by creating a fake scam case and awarding the funds to himself.

This happened after Trevoid publicly claimed that XHash had previously scammed users on the forum. The KYCnotlist admin then reportedly treated the deposit as payment for a fake scam report. Based on these circumstances, I believe users should not trust the KycNotList.com admin and should conduct their own research before sending him any money.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579256.msg67077869#msg67077869

It looks like you added the wrong link which was a reply to your complaint in the announcement thread and not particularly the case of a fabricated scam accusation.
We need to look at that link showing how he was making fake scam cases and awarding himself the funds.

But I do see a very huge loophole in the even the a service that made any deposit exit scams

[examplens]

Am I the only one who found it strange when they themselves (quite easily) decided to cover the loss of one user out of their own pocket, who was cheated by an exchange that was only a partner of KycNotList?

@85pandora 9000$
@PitWlss 4100$

Over $10,000 has been distributed; did I miss out?

Yes, we discussed this earlier in this thread:

@TryNinja @LoyceV

You’ve raised a very important point.

We already responded to both affected users yesterday, explaining that compensation amounts will be paid in proportion to their losses, and it would be unfair of us to change the terms now and pay less than promised. But on the other hand, you are right: our website includes a warning advising users not to make individual transactions exceeding the amount of their deposit.

Your theory makes perfect sense, but I think that in this case, the victim who lost $100,000 is a real person-after all. It's unlikely that Tomboy would have committed fraud $7,000.

I think it would be fair this time to contribute a little of our own funds so that the victim’s payout of $7,000 is slightly higher-perhaps we could increase it to $4,100.

But, of course, we can’t keep doing this indefinitely, since this is no small amount for us, and by making this contribution out of our own funds, we’re sacrificing the development of our project. That’s why we need to clearly define the payment rules and post them on our website, so that in situations like this, everything is transparent and clear to everyone.

But here, too, we need to understand that a scammer might not create one large sum, but rather many small ones, so that after the scam, they can request a withdrawal from different accounts.

I would be very grateful for the continuation of this discussion so that you can help us draft more effective rules for distributing deposits in the future.

All this was confirmed by the newbie, where all communication took place behind the PM.

I'm very grateful to KycNotList!
After a bad experience with a scam exchanger, this platform honestly shared part of the escrow deposit of 4100 USDT.
I highly recommend this platform. You fully justify the trust placed in you!
Good luck in your development!

So they covered part of the debt of the exchange from escrow, they even "added their own funds". Why then would anyone have a reason to ask for more details, because these are good guys.
It is quite possible that the whole story was done in order to keep part of the escrow for himself.

[dkbit98]

This whole situation with KycNotList serice reminds me on another similar B.C. service from same russian region, and their notoriously bad feedback system.