bitcointalk-mobile.com exists now

[btctalk-mobile]

It's just a mobile-friendly proxy to the main site with a 1 minute cache. You can't log in through it. I hope others find it useful

bitcointalk-mobile.com

[NeuroticFish]

I am unsure what makes this better than using it in browser, but yeah, maybe I'm too old for this.
However, given that some do this kind of tools in good faith and other don't, I recommend anybody using this or any other proxy where will enter user name and password, consider staking first a bitcoin address in case it's necessary to recover the account.

[UchihaSarada]

It's just a mobile-friendly proxy to the main site with a 1 minute cache. You can't log in through it. I hope others find it useful

Why do I need that while I can visit, read only, or login my account, read and post on both mobile devices and computers or laptops easily and comfortably.

Forum has its pages of mobile
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593910.0;wap
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593910.0;wap2
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593910.0;imode

Code:

http://bitcointalk-mobile.com

I don't mind to visit this link, it's a dangerous practice.

[logfiles]

Sorry for watering down your effort but the biggest challenge with Bitcointalk right now when using a mobile phone is actually when you are trying to reply a post or quoting a post and you have to edit some parts. In other words, when one is reading, it's not so much of a challenge and UchihaSarada has already shown you mobile friendly versions.

[LoyceV]

I'm paranoid enough to only test this in Tor browser:

Error: Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL / from this server.

[IjawMan]

It's just a mobile-friendly proxy to the main site with a 1 minute cache. You can't log in through it. I hope others find it useful

bitcointalk-mobile.com

Bravo for the initiative.

Does the forum has it own mobile view? Yes. Then you will be disappointed cause forum members will not have a use for your "mobile friendly proxy" when there is an existing mobile view with risk-free to any phishing attack.

The risk of endorsing yours to the forum is a concern with your rank as a factor.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

So, something totally unnecessary does exist now. What else?

It's just a mobile-friendly proxy to the main site with a 1 minute cache.

Unlike bitcointalk.org where you visit the site in real time.

You can't log in through it.

Unlike when I visit the real site and can log in, as UchihaSarada says.

I'm paranoid enough to only test this in Tor browser:

Error: Forbidden
Your client does not have permission to get URL / from this server.

In my case, not even that. I'm not going to bother.

I hope others find it useful

No way. You've already seen the answers.

[Tetu100]

I don't mind to visit this link, it's a dangerous practice.

That's true bro, is really a very dangerous practice for someone to be clicking on every single link not minding the outcome of such action. Sometimes it could be a trap and by clicking you become a potential victim in one way or the other. However,  Since we can barely experienced any form of challenges while using the official one (https://bitcointalk.org) we've being using then that should be fine for now.

Moreover, presenting such sensitive information from a brand new account is more questionable and I think is the more reason we should be more careful.

[PX-Z]

...
Forum has its pages of mobile
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593910.0;wap
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593910.0;wap2
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5593910.0;imode

This is the very old kind of mobile version of an internet page, like for java phones way back then? lol.

Well, the forum in mobile mode is fine, or i'm just used to using this lol. There are also lots of userscripts for mobile versions, including mine.

[acroman08]

This would have been more useful if you made it into a script instead of a "a mobile-friendly proxy to the main site with a 1 minute cache". I mean, what exactly is the use of it when the forum can be viewed without issue when using a phone?

[Donneski]

Op, it's possible that you genuinely wanted to give us something new and make the forum more comfortable on mobile devices, however, I honestly find this a bit useless. Why use a proxy that adds another layer to reformat pages when most modern mobile browsers can easily access Bitcointalk? Why should I use it when I can't log in or post with it?  If you want to improve the forum's mobile experience, you should come with something that adds more brilliance to what we have already, this one is boring and unnecessary.

[libert19]

Well, the forum in mobile mode is fine, or i'm just used to using this lol. There are also lots of userscripts for mobile versions, including mine.

Same. I don't even use any userscript (except Ninja's script to copy signature codes), just raw version, have never felt 'real need' for anything else.

Edit:

Same. I don't even use any userscript (except Ninja's script to copy signature codes), just raw version, have never felt 'real need' for anything else.

A new patch has been added to the forum, so now you can copy whole code or signature code without any scripts.

Perfection!

[Dareo]

I just visited your website. So, I didn't find it that convenient after visiting. To say the least, I noticed a lot of bugs, that feel uncomfortable while reading. First of all, it takes a long time to load, then the quotes are not clear. Moreover you cannot visit someone's profile while reading post. These proxies are not very useful tough.

Same. I don't even use any userscript (except Ninja's script to copy signature codes), just raw version, have never felt 'real need' for anything else.

A new patch has been added to the forum, so now you can copy whole code or signature code without any scripts.

PowerGlove sent me a different way of doing this, which is live now, but it's sort of hidden: if you click the blue "Code:" text immediately before the actual code block, then it'll select the whole code block.

[LTU_btc]

I visited your website o mobile and it looks good and convenient to read, but like others said, I don't see what's exactly point of this website when it's just mirror of Bitcointalk. So, let's say I read some topic on this mirror and then I want to reply something - I still would have to go to original Bitcointalk. So, I just don't see in what cases this mirror can be useful for someone.

[AVE5]

It's just a mobile-friendly proxy to the main site with a 1 minute cache. You can't log in through it. I hope others find it useful

bitcointalk-mobile.com

Bravo for the initiative.

Does the forum has it own mobile view? Yes. Then you will be disappointed cause forum members will not have a use for your "mobile friendly proxy" when there is an existing mobile view with risk-free to any phishing attack.

The risk of endorsing yours to the forum is a concern with your rank as a factor.

Of course you're talking lot of sensitive matters here and while Op tries to build a mobile friendly site, it's unfortunate that we already have an existing version which even search better for easy and reliable accessibility.
If we can also have the main version here that we can login and navigate freely through mobile and desktop, then this other invention of the Op is totally going to lost its interest.
It's also of no doubt that the site would be neglected because of the Op's rank haven not gained that reputable reliance of other members that'd prompt them use the newbies site.

[MarryWithBTC]

I have seen some people complain about mobile phone being inconveniencing for editing posts in the forum. Your service could be of a help to them. I visit the forum 95% with computer, so I do not have need for your service.

I visited your website o mobile and it looks good and convenient to read, but like others said, I don't see what's exactly point of this website when it's just mirror of Bitcointalk. So, let's say I read some topic on this mirror and then I want to reply something - I still would have to go to original Bitcointalk. So, I just don't see in what cases this mirror can be useful for someone.

Oh, it's a mirror website and when you want to post, you return to the normal view. If so, no problem is solved .

[jcojci]

Thank you for the site but phone is only to communicate to our relatives and for have fun so I don't feels comfortable browsing sites using the phone.

I can visit Bitcointalk using my laptop or PC and if I am not access the devices and only have phone with me, I don't open the browser and maybe just scroll apps. And I don't want to login in the not the real site.

[libert19]

Thank you for the site but phone is only to communicate to our relatives and for have fun so I don't feels comfortable browsing sites using the phone.

Mobile is much more than fun activities and to communicate these days, it's different thing you don't feel comfortable.

...And I don't want to login in the not the real site.

You can't login anyway. It's hilarious neither you read the op which is literally one line, neither the comments and neither checked the site itself whether you can actually login.

[*Ace*]

I don't want to be mean, but browsing the forum on mobile devices is quite good, no need to use any proxy
It puts a lot of things at risk. Besides, why should I trust a new user? I advise everyone to avoid this project, then evaluate carefully for yourselves.
For a better browsing experience, there are many theme userscripts designed specifically for mobile devices, which are significantly more secure.
With respect to everyone, please be careful.
Sincerely,
*ace*

[ryzaadit]

I have seen some people complain about mobile phone being inconveniencing for editing posts in the forum. Your service could be of a help to them.

Some community already contributed for mobile user, at least it will make their activity easier. Example a tools script from PX-Z: Another Forum Mobile Enhancement Userscript

• Script-based, without needing to go to another site
• GitHub source code is available

Seeing how the interface looks with a few screenshot from the creator script, I think is more than enough.

Screenshots

Comparing between these one and with script from @PX-Z are more scary to these one. I would rather use the script rather than visit to some random site.

Feels to visit the thread from @PX-Z. To get more information about the script.