Ai rules

[Joy_learns_crypto]

So polymarket has put it out that Governor Newsom is pushing for some new guiding laws on Ai. https://x.com/i/status/2100980866071621645.

Since Governor Newsom is just the Governor of California how does this affect the bigger landscape of things. We have Donald Trump on call with Nvidia boss claiming the Ai scare are just propaganda, we have China hurriedly abandoning the use of Nvidia chip in the development of Ai for Huawei chip, we also have the God father of Ai saying that Ai would be able to convince humans from applying the kill switch.

So much to unravel, is Ai a plaque or a prize. If your know about Ai in the US you should know that California has the strongest of interest just maybe the governor could achieve something with this.

[dotpizza]

When it comes to AI, “just the Governor of California” is almost like saying “just the Governor of Silicon Valley.” With so many leading AI companies based there, regulations introduced by a single state could effectively become standards far beyond its borders. The real question isn’t whether AI is a blessing or a disaster, but whether regulation can keep up with the speed of its development.

[JeromeTash]

Why weren't the guidelines set out earlier on before AI became what it is today?
I think it is a little too late. Maybe the guideline will only work in the US, but I don't think all other countries that are developing their own models will have to bow down to what law is passed in the US. For example, with China trying as much as possible to rely on its own chips and not trying to depend on American tech, why should they listen to what the US says once their AI industry becomes a very big thing?

[hellflame]

Californicate is a bought and paid for state by TPTB. TPTB will now regulate the competition including those pesky open source crowd out of business so they are the only cartel making you prove you are a human and not AI  in order to use the future MOTB internet. Bonny prince charlie will guide the players accordingly. Smile for the camera.

[Alpha Marine]

Why weren't the guidelines set out earlier on before AI became what it is today?

It doesn't work like that. Nobody foresees everything that will happen in the future and makes plans for it. Some things happen as events unfold. All the current banking regulations were not made in one day. I don't know of any country that is still using the first constitution the country ever made.
It's the same with AI. Regulations are guidelines that will be made as the technology grows and advances. So you can't blame them for not setting guidelines from the beginning. Besides, AI did not just become a big deal overnight. There was no date that was set as the day AI would become a big deal, so guidelines could be set before that day. It just started growing step by step. Just like crypto.
Crypto wasn't so big from the beginning, so there were no regulations, but as it got bigger, governments around the world started making regulations.
Discussions and research about AI have been going on since around the 60s. It got serious in the 2010s, and in the 2020s, the sector exploded, so at what point could they have set guidelines for it?

I think it is a little too late.

I don't agree that it's too late. It's better to try to implement them now than not do it for the next 1000+ years. Considering how much longer AI would be in existence (which is as long as humans still exist), I don't think it's too late.
And the more understanding people and regulatory bodies have of AI, the more guidelines and regulations. From where I'm standing, I think AI is still relatively early.