Appeal in the Sigban case MuffinMaster

[MuffinMaster]

Hello everyone,

I just realized that I received a Sigban a few days ago (I'm guessing from the date it's September 13, 2027, so probably for a year). I haven't had a signature recently, so it took me a few days to realize it.

I checked my score on the nutildah software, and it seems to be very low. It's hard to say what the software is checking and why the score is so low, as it doesn't seem to be clearly explained anywhere.
The only thing I can think of is that a few years ago I actually wrote very low-quality posts, which were mostly spam. Well.. people change over time and can also improve the quality of their posts. So the only thing I can think of is that posts from years ago were taken into account, not those from the last year.

I've read the history of other appeals, and I have the impression that the strongest argument is just history of my posts and not what I write here, so I'm opening this appeal so that the community can evaluate my posts. Thank you in advance for your time and honest opinions.

I am much more likely to consider making changes to what I'm doing if someone can simply explain why its wrong without having to get defensive and personal about it. I'd like to encourage more actual dialogue. The pointless personal attacks will never amount to more than a setback.

As I wrote earlier, I have the impression that your software is taking very old posts into account. Of course, it's wrong that I've written low-quality posts in the past, but as you've said more than once, what you're doing is supposed to improve the quality of posts. However, if the quality is already improved, so Im not sure if penalty is needed..

[nutildah]

If you've not read it yet I encourage you to read the first post in this thread, it explains a lot:

Signature Ban Appeal Q&A: read before appealing your sigban

As I wrote earlier, I have the impression that your software is taking very old posts into account. Of course, it's wrong that I've written low-quality posts in the past, but as you've said more than once, what you're doing is supposed to improve the quality of posts. However, if the quality is already improved, so Im not sure if penalty is needed..

In your case I was looking at posts from the beginning of August (this year) until now. I'm not quite certain what you mean by "already improved" because your current posts in large don't seem to be contributing much to any given discussion, and you're often posting about the same subjects, adding superficial value in terms of advancing the conversation:

Casinos offer these bonuses and promotions for a reason, right? Surely you wouldn't deny that they're there to attract players?

If a casino offers bonuses, they should have a realistic chance of being withdraw. However, if withdrawal is unrealistic, it's better to play at a social casino rather than with real money.

To answer your question, no – casinos aren't there to generate income, but they're also not there to only lose.

To be fair, some of the threads you participate in are already low grade to begin with, and most accounts that make a career of repeatedly posting in such threads should probably be sigbanned as well.

Frankly, I don't find your participation on this forum to be genuine, nor do I think many people actually read or care about your posts. I'm not inclined to reverse the ban without some kind of additional perspective I may be missing.

[FinneysTrueVision]

Perhaps if you were to focus on a single account instead of many you would have made more progress in improving your post quality and wouldn’t keep getting these signature bans.

Yurkov (Signature banned — 21 jul 2026)
longyenthanh (Signature banned — 21 jul 2026)
LordShanken (Signature banned — 21 jul 2026)
Theones (red tagged 4 times)

Yurkov is tagged as having connections to other users that are part of a mass account farm. Yurkov, lonyenthanh, LordShanken, and MuffinMaster were all in the Kikabet campaign together. These 4 accounts were the only participants in the campaign using taproot addresses to receive payments.

All these accounts shared the same Binance deposit address 0x7254014DCB1902041c5709C4ce4FF6469825D2c7



Before denying you are all the same person, what is the likelihood that three unique individuals would decide on the same day to sweep their funds to Coinbase at around the same time. That doesn’t happen by coincidence.

[Hatchy]

Perhaps if you were to focus on a single account instead of many you would have made more progress in improving your post quality and wouldn’t keep getting these signature bans.

I think this shows why many of the accounts banned since the signature ban began have become inactive on the forum. Simply jumping from one alt account to another will not help in this situation. I decided to scroll through the list of signature banned users, and I noticed that around 70% of the banned accounts became inactive after receiving their bans.

I just hope they understand that the purpose of the ban is to improve their post quality and overall post health, not to simply sit back and wait for the ban period to end so they can get their signatures back.I was actually going to ask if nutildah has any plans for profiles that fail to improve during the ban period. Will their ban dates be extended, or will their signatures simply remain banned until they show some improvement?

[Satofan44]

Frankly, I don't find your participation on this forum to be genuine, nor do I think many people actually read or care about your posts. I'm not inclined to reverse the ban without some kind of additional perspective I may be missing.

The perspective is that you are being soft on this case given that the user operates several accounts. There must be a criteria already defined for accounts who deserve permanent signature bans for what they have done, that is what is missing.

Perhaps if you were to focus on a single account instead of many you would have made more progress in improving your post quality and wouldn’t keep getting these signature bans.

Yurkov (Signature banned — 21 jul 2026)
longyenthanh (Signature banned — 21 jul 2026)
LordShanken (Signature banned — 21 jul 2026)
Theones (red tagged 4 times)

Great find, tagged.

[lovesmayfamilis]

All these accounts shared the same Binance deposit address 0x7254014DCB1902041c5709C4ce4FF6469825D2c7

Soon, appeals will stop being filed altogether, as this becomes no less dangerous than appearing with any complaints in the reputation section. If you file an appeal from one account, you'll leave with three red tags.😃
OP, was this your last account, which you apparently "lost your temper" with, losing patience to express your disagreement to nutildah? Or do you still have other accounts? Now it's clear why so many people are banned, but almost no one bothers to file appeals.

[Rikafip]

What a shock. Who would have thought that sig banned member is spamming the forum from several alt accounts, that were also sig banned.

The only surprising thing here is that they still haven't learned their lesson. Instead of keeping a low profile and waiting for their sig bans to expire, they come here to complain and end up getting their accounts permanently rekt. Let's see who is next.  

[nutildah]

It was pretty apparent from the getgo this person's post quality suffered because of divided attention across multiple accounts. They have no main account to lean on and thus all their accounts produce equally low value posts.

There may be a day in which another figmentofmyass comes along (who are we kidding, he's probably already here) in which case that would have to be a pure reputation issue as his posts were some of the smartest at any given time. Talking about repetitiveness, all 3 of his main accounts hardly ever repeated the same subjects, and had wide vocabularies.

This person is no figmentofmyass, however.

[The Cryptovator]

I've read the history of other appeals, and I have the impression that the strongest argument is just history of my posts and not what I write here, so I'm opening this appeal so that the community can evaluate my posts. Thank you in advance for your time and honest opinions.

Can you please help us by pointing out your contribution to the forum? Every user will share their own opinions, but the decision will be taken by the person who issues the signature ban for you. You have to prove to the community that you aren’t a spammer and you wrongly got the signature ban.

I have checked your post history; it does not look interesting to me, to be honest. Due to maintaining so many alts, you forgot to focus on your post. I will advise you to contribute to the forum and prove to yourself that you have changed yourself. Then create another appeal thread. Also, you seem to have negative feedback and neutral feedback that would make you regret even the signature ban being removed.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

The only surprising thing here is that they still haven't learned their lesson. Instead of keeping a low profile and waiting for their sig bans to expire, they come here to complain and end up getting their accounts permanently rekt. Let's see who is next.  

He basically painted a target on his back with the appeal 


I am not surprised OP was cheat with multiple accounts and that was probably the last account standing. There was something off about some of his gambling discussion posts. It's unfortunate that all the accounts in this farm were over a decade old and after all those years, no lesson was learned on how make proper posts in the forum.