I spent the past 3 hours reviewing everything mentioned, and waited for trust update ----->
https://loyce.club/trust/2026-09-26_Sat_05.18h/2344286.html[1] to obtain a more neutral assessment.
If you noticed, not many DT members were convinced by what you presented, so I can list the reasons that will lead to adding more negative trust, such as proving
any of the following:
1. Relationship between LM and @naim027 farm.
2. LM continued to promote any scam project (after it was proven.)
3. LM uses an alt account to join a signature campaign or add known spammers to one of its campaigns.
4. LM steals any money deposited in escrow or intentionally misuses it.
5. LM defaults on any payments related to any signature campaign.
Overall I look forward to hearing the opinions of those who still trust LM.
Most of the people that trust this user trust him solely because he is a money source for them, or was in the past. Very unreliable, and unethical way to trust someone. It seems that there is no limit to the amount of scams that one is allowed to run here as long as sufficient DT members have been paid in the past, or are being paid presently.
How many scams is one permitted to
conduct promote this way before you would take action? It would be good to establish a number, so that future campaign managers know how many scams they can deliver without consequences, unintentionally of course.
Be fair and just and establish a number, so that everyone can work with it. Do not give a green pass to someone just because he has been a money source for many forum members -- a lot of that money is from previous scams, but nobody wants to deal with that fact.
I don't understand what's the big deal about red trust ratings.
If most DT members don't agree with the trust rating, it doesn't affect anything anyway. I mean what difference does it make if 9 out of 10 campaign managers don't see a problem with hiring Shishir99 in their campaigns? That rating effectively becomes a note from some guy. Yes that guy is a DT member too and it is worth reading but since many people (probably most) don't agree with it, it is practically ineffective and we can see that in the recent change of trust lists.
It is the heavy bombarding of red trust ratings (and flags with heavy support) on a profile that moves something.
There is no issue, it is just individuals pretending that it matters. It depends more on "who received it" rather than "why". Don't take games of pretend all too serious, they are quite obvious if you look at it with a sharp eye.
My trust is appropriate, including the flag. I don't trust this user - it has been already all explained.
That is right, don't let paid off scoundrels who pretend to be unbiased while receiving money scare you off. Your style might be a bit crazy though, it is lovely.
