bitbollo needs help - Is it worth the blood?

[JollyGood]

ths thread shows why people should keep screenshots, payment records, and clear agreements when dealing with casino campaigns. it makes disputes much easier to verify.

I have no idea who you are and I am not interested either but you have posted as a newbie in a thread in the Reputation board that you should have literally no interest in if you were a real newbie. Why have you made yourself part of the debate? Granted, you are operating a newbie account but every member reading your post will conclude you definitely are not new to the forum.

Word, I have been calling out LM myself and got credited with 2 useless feedbacks from him. This guy really is something else and the way he spoke to Bitbollo is basically a copy of the way he spoke to me. This guy cannot be trusted in my opinion, taking on every casino gig possible, despite the questionable results in the past, just looks very shady. Money over safety of others. Promoting these scam casinos harms other people that actually fall for them, yet of course it's all not his fault.
But hey, if you say something he immediately retaliates, that's the power of DT1. You confuse something and he immediately calls you out for "spreading lies" (despite instant edit and apology) yet that's what he does to earn money. Lie to people that certain sites are a safe place to play.
He even got a certain person to change their trust to distrust, that's the power of the puppetmaster.  

Too bad too many people still don't see his true face, but sooner or later everyone will.

This is an interesting post. No doubt you too could be caught up in a massive amount of posts that are designed to attack you and/or designed to bury your comments.

Every member has a right to post their opinions about another member and they should be able to do it without facing a coordinated retaliation strategy designed to demonstrate that the cliques will take action against those willing to voice valid concerns. If groups aligned with the same ideology want to suppress voices that are concerned with their conduct, then all members of the community have a responsibility to ensure they do not succeed.

As a community, we should all be able to post about our concerns regardless of whether they relate to a newbie or any established members.

seems like the important part here is getting all the details documented before things get more heated. if there's a dispute over funds, the transaction records and messages should probably make it easier to see what actually happened. the arguing back and forth isn't really helping either side.

Another newbie account posting in a thread they should have no interest participating in.

yeah once a money dispute turns into personal arguments, it gets a lot harder to figure out what actually happened. i'd rather see the transaction details and the full conversation laid out first. that would make it easier for people reading the thread to judge the situation.

Yet another newbie account posting in a thread they should have no interest participating in.

The negative feedback and arguments are probably going to make people take sides before they even get through the actual details.

Well, another newbie account posting in a thread they should have no interest participating in.

[AB de Royse777]

Pales in comparison, what goes behind the scenes, tip of the iceberg...

I once allowed myself to speak quite harshly about a certain manager after being provoked, but that pales in comparison to what goes on behind the scenes (including comments from project owners who, to put it mildly, regret their initial choice due to the utter incompetence of certain individuals).

Hello "the honest" or "the good" guy whatever you try to portrait yourself in-public. Can we go here not now but after all these fuss is over? Let the place cools down first. Then one to one - you and me - publicly. You seem to try everything to look me bad and constantly doing it by teaming* with your buddies. Let me give you some clue in case you are wondering.





You can start with the number of times you have played such type of dirty games with my clients.

*Regarding this teaming thing - I got that offer a lot of times and yesterday it came again. This is interesting, let me share a snap LOL

[nutildah]

At this stage, the problem is not with Bitbollo.

While the other tags and flags are more debatable, the red tag on Shishir99 is clearly a reactive overreach. Its not necessary; thus it is still a problem.

A simple way to remove this flag existed for a long time, yet it was ignored. Perhaps you should look at the situation considering the full picture.

If you recall, before turning to me, b1exch was originally an LM client. As soon as this was announced, systematic attacks against the project and against me began (this is not an isolated case).
...
This unequivocally means that cLoazyL was directed by someone who possessed links that had not been posted on the project's website at the time of my announcement.

I just read the whole thread and it appears to be a case of attacking the messenger, who had a very valid message... even if it was delivered annoyingly, and perhaps in direct contradiction with a prior moral stance. Maybe you're right, but the evidence at this point is mostly anecdotal.

[JollyGood]

Just take a look at your ridiculous self-moderated thread where any member posting anything that you do not like or agree with will find the post deleted. It seems as though you have not learned anything from your time in the forum. Who will waste their time posting anything in that thread perceived by you to be anti-Royse777?

What nonsense is this: "Regarding JollyGood and alt account Satofan44 - these two accounts (or one person having their own conversation) are troll towards me. Anyone disagrees? There are a few other accounts too but seems like they are not actively trolling right now."

Stop your obsession with me and learn to be happy for both yourself and for others as it will bring a lot of positivity and happiness to your life.

~

[icopress]

Your interpretation and motives are clear. But you know, I’m sick of you spitting at the back of my head for years—as a token of gratitude. I’ve had at least three opportunities to give you the "lesson" you truly deserve, but I held off, wanting to give you a second or third chance.

As soon as I have the time, we will discuss your behavior, and I will put a permanent end to this ongoing saga.

[AB de Royse777]

Search parameters: Author JollyGood, Date starting this year to until today, Fuzzy search
https://bitlist.co/search?content=Royse777&author=JollyGood&date_min=2026-01-01&date_max=2026-09-24&fuzziness=true&limit=20
Showing 1-20 of 22 results for "Royse777" by JollyGood

https://bitlist.co/search?content=AB&author=JollyGood&date_min=2026-01-01&date_max=2026-09-24&fuzziness=true&limit=20
Search by AB - Showing 1-16 of 16 results for "AB" by JollyGood

https://bitlist.co/search?content=Sinbad&author=JollyGood&date_min=2026-01-01&date_max=2026-09-24&fuzziness=true&limit=20
Showing 1-7 of 7 results for "Sinbad" by JollyGood

Search parameters: Author AB de Royse777, Date starting this year to until today, Fuzzy search
https://bitlist.co/search?content=JG&author=AB%20de%20Royse777&date_min=2026-01-01&date_max=2026-09-24&fuzziness=true&limit=20
Showing 1-3 of 3 results for "JG" by AB de Royse777

https://bitlist.co/search?content=JollyGood&author=AB%20de%20Royse777&date_min=2026-01-01&date_max=2026-09-24&fuzziness=true&limit=20
Showing 1-5 of 5 results for "JollyGood" by AB de Royse777

Subject: obsession by numbers

[JollyGood]

Your interpretation and motives are clear. But you know, I’m sick of you spitting at the back of my head for years—as a token of gratitude. I’ve had at least three opportunities to give you the "lesson" you truly deserve, but I held off, wanting to give you a second or third chance.

As soon as I have the time, we will discuss your behavior, and I will put a permanent end to this ongoing saga.

If it helps the buffoon wake up, please do not give him any more chances. He has had plenty of chances and instead of being grateful for what the forum has provided for him, he thinks the forum revolves around him.

~

You are looking more of a fool today than you did yesterday. Stop your obsession with any member that posts something you do not like.

[bitbollo]

Sure. Don't trust verify.
I have provided dozens of proofs and explained clearly why these users deserve a red trust.
If you don't trust me it's ok but you cannot pretend we have to not warning users before they read other suggestions about :
- "hey why escalate so fast - 7 days?" - or
- "hey have you play to the best tower game - in a scam website?"

TODAY HAS BEEN HACKERED BITGET - CAN WE OPEN AN HARRASSING TOPIC ABOUT USERS HAVE NOT WAIT 7 DAYS FOR WARNING ABOUT THE HACK?
AND I WOULD LIKE TO READ AN ANSWERS ALSO ABOUT THE PROPER TIMELINE FOR OPENING A SCAM ACCUSATION AGAINST @yogg and COLDCARD
(DOUBLE STANDARDS with scammers are the best! )

Can I read some evidences and not just "in my opinion"?  I have explained why all of these red tag are appropriate. Read just the proofs, after 9 pages of "it's all true" what is "sufficient for you"?

I agree with the views expressed; the reasons cited previously are insufficient to support that flag. LM did not intend to breach or harm the contract (the issue arose from negligence) so I oppose that flag.

Insufficient you mean that I need to post another 5 scam of the last 12 months and you have also evaluated this scam "live right now" ?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67174787#msg67174787  

Just Asking because I can understand that maybe once there 10 scams "that can be recognized in 2 minutes" someone will say "insufficient" ... why not 15 scams to be scammer? or 20? Or I don't know, how many cards has to peel @yogg to be a scammer? Or cold card, how many hardware need to fail? LOL I love double standards.

...
The same applies to @Shishir99's situation. I do not know @bitbollo, but I would kindly ask him to remove that negative rating.

I am a pharmacist in real life and this is an information that can be find easily. Member of bitcoin Italian association since 2015 blablablabl...
Once this guy has questioned "mental or health help" we haven't nothing to deal anymore and he is untrustworthy. It's rude, offensive, a disturbing comment considering all scams have been confirmed and "campaign manager" call the scammers as "the team". Still looking for better idea! Yeah it's sufficient for a flag!

Many users knows me in real life and trust in many many things and activities. I have never seen someone that promotes 1 scam 1 month have such defense but you can't buy trust of people.
As I have said, such topic is a pure defamation and has just exposed more scam of this "campaign manager".
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
This user has never admit the full list of scam, or the total non-sense reaction or worst how it has still endorsed the "casino"
"come on take 100 USD and shut up"

This user has offensively and threateningly quoted and mentioned all the users who have added me to their trust list. Definitely a spammer and a low-quality shill account.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.msg67165341#msg67165341

This user shill and supports a scam casino and an user that has clearly violated an agreement according a written agreement. Shitposter/Low quality too. Check reference.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.msg67165386#msg67165386

Once there are 3 pages of FROGBET TOPIC talking about 7 days of missing payment/stolen deposits, it's completely off topic and pretty scam approach presenting them as "the best tower game". It's the same as @yogg art. Once he was scamming no one was admiring his art. @ChiBitCTy has already explained a glimpse about this.

He has called 7 days as "escaleted fasted as light". I don't trust his judgement. How many days we have to wait before claiming a scam?
I have waited for 7 days and providing ALL ALERTS POSSIBLE.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"

If all these days / these warnings/ list of scams/ is not enough for adding a trust negative - and the problem has become my person/role - it's evident the DT system is completely failed

I can continue to quote endless the same and same answers that definetely explain why there is a specific trust rating.
Bitcoin is based on evidences, opinions are worth zero But it's more easy provide OPINIONS and SKIPS EVIDENCE AND FACTS.

We have just reached 10 pages of the scam. Despite an entire topic to harrass and defame my person - and not to address the scam accusation - same users involved continue to have "better idea on how to works with scammers".

What is a better, a selection of scam of the pasts, or wait a few weeks for the next scam?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

Would you bet 5K USD ? Where are these moneys now? Ah yes... he is very good resource since 2022! Sure, it's very good to use AI - proof attached.
Why these users are allowed and justified in all these scam/offensive actions - I don't know - but they will red tagged accordingly.

Shishir99 has been contributing to this thread since 2022. Your first post here was to announce your AI detector. Before I make any incorrect assumptions, maybe you can help me understand your end goal: do you want us to replace our current system with your detector, or do you want us to add it to the list of detectors we are using?

Have you see also how much drama he is ready to make by itself?

You said - I used AI, I am a scammer, I am a spammer, a shill, a suckpuppet. If you cannot prove all of them, you have to pay me $5K for wasting my time. If you can prove it, I will send you $5K. You choose the escrow, and I will send the funds. Deal?

First post with AI and then is ready to "I will send you $5K. You choose the escrow, and I will send the funds. Deal?"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67165534#msg67165534
Where are these 5K USD? Is words have no reasons to be trusted and there are too much actions too justify these red trust. Otherwise please go ahead an trust this guy.

You can see your guys "good with AI" using it and then denying it

Not derail - you posted a long comment immediately after 5 minutes.
https://bitlist.co/post/67165534/versions

It was formatted with AI. You complete to act as a complete liar. Haven't you done for today right?

[nutildah]

- "hey why escalate so fast - 7 days?" - or
- "hey have you play to the best tower game - in a scam website?"

These are not good reasons to leave a red trust on an otherwise productive forum member. Its an overblown response based more in emotion than reason. The first point is a non-issue. You are blowing things out of proportion by equating it with non-trustworthiness. The second point can happen to anybody. Its a continuance of promoting a scam after clear warning signs have been established that should matter. I do not consider Shishir99's actions to be indications of untrustworthiness, nor do most others who have bothered to chime in so far.

I'm not going to ask you to consider removing the red trust on that account in particular. You should want to do it on your own, because its the right thing to do.

[bitbollo]

- "hey why escalate so fast - 7 days?" - or
- "hey have you play to the best tower game - in a scam website?"

I have left 10 pages of explanations in two topics and these actions are typical of shill of scammers.

Can we clarify after many days we can open a scam accusations without being public treated like a shit?
Can we clarify (so all users of forum can use this deouble standard next time) why this users has been allowed to deny there was a scam despite there was 3 pages of topic talking about the scam?

After 20/25 messages and a full topic explaining a scam ongoing since a week https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0
I have been treated like a shit by this user despite was everything true. He has never replied to my observation but has just try to retiliate calling me "liar".
Also the trust the he left has no sense.
Have you see lies here? No, thats just another confirmations he is not a trustworthy user.

At this point, lets be clear here: some users have an indefinite list of scams behaviour condoned. Meanwhile reputable users have no chance to highlight scammers and scam behaviours.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177548#msg67177548 These are facts and evidences.

Opinions are based on? Yes he is so productive that has spent an entire topic to harrass me, and still you cannot comment about "the bet of 5K USD"...
He lose the bets. He was lying even on this.  I find something pretty questionable this approach to not look on EVIDENCES.

Anyone that has continued to advertise and promote a casino despite it's a confirmed scam deserve just a red trust.

- "hey why escalate so fast - 7 days?" - or
- "hey have you play to the best tower game - in a scam website?"

...

[Satofan44]

You're making it seem like its totally random whether you will end up promoting a scam or not. The fact is some managers are more likely to promote scams than others. It is 1000% up to the manager to weed out a bad project from the getgo, and they should not be immune from the consequences of lending credibility to scams. "Its just a cost of business" is not a reasonable excuse.

There is absolutely zero due diligence conducted by Little Mouse, who is an alt of naim027 -- but eventually you will get there while waiting for your evidence.

Little Mouse is a scammer that manages campaigns for as low as $10 per week, meaning they are not really being "managed" in any sense of the word -- basic counting is not "managing", toddlers can do that.

There is nobody in the world that is capable of doing due diligence or is conducting due diligence and "management" work for $10 per week. This is less than the absolute poverty threshold that was defined more than a decade ago, get yourself together. That is why some campaign managers cost a lot, real work costs money.

And it is a problem if campaign managers repeatedly endorse scam products/services. "I couldn't have known they would scam" is a poor excuse which reflects a lack of basic judgment skills. LM should definitely be more selective and work harder to avoid introducing potential scams to the community.

How many scams is one permitted to conduct promote this way before you would take action? It would be good to establish a number, so that future campaign managers know how many scams they can deliver without consequences, unintentionally of course.  
Be fair and just and establish a number, so that everyone can work with it. Do not give a green pass to someone just because he has been a money source for many forum members -- a lot of that money is from previous scams, but nobody wants to deal with that fact.

Anyone that has continued to advertise and promote a casino despite it's a confirmed scam deserve just a red trust.

That is a good point, and there is historical precedence for this kind of tag. I find it strange that members want to try to establish that campaign members do not have any liability for advertising scams. They should be held liable, that is the very least that should be done.
Campaign managers defending a campaign manager, signature campaign participants defending their source of money even after he was involved in several scams just this year? Do you see the problem?  

[holydarkness]

Ok, I've been watching this from... very far, Io perhaps, with telescope, as the case is too hot to jump in before. But... as we're seemingly going around and around and keep on returning to the square zero, with no foreseeable outcome...

Sure. Don't trust verify.
I have provided dozens of proofs and explained clearly why these users deserve a red trust.
[...]

May I exercise this? "Don't trust, verify,"? From both of you? bitbollo and Little Mouse?

I recall screenshots of conversation already shared to other members? Now, I won't say who do what, but I do have in my hand what seemingly to be the complete conversation, where almost each end of screenshot meet the beginning of the next one, that led me to believe it give little to zero manipulation, and I'd like to invite the other party to nudge me with their own version of entire screenshot, just to minimize the chance of ninja-edit by the first party.

Or, we can do the other way around by me posting the entire conversation I have in my possession by both of your permission?

Asking and jumping in because after reading them, I think the context given by those conversation plays a major role in the direction of this case.

[bitbollo]

Due diligence is an oxymoron. You can check how "casually" some other casino would just scam soon and others have just not been posted.
It's evident that even if there are a dozen of scam identified with 0 due diligence, the limit will be raised endless.

- "hey why escalate so fast - 7 days?" - or
- "hey have you play to the best tower game - in a scam website?"

That's not a rethorical question. Meanwhile we are justifing a scammer, someone is just losing money.  
What are the numbers of days that we need to wait before open a scam accusation? For how many days scammer can deny a scam/continue to call as "a team" ?

Frogbet has permanently restricted my account and confiscated my ~ $248 deposit under the guise of a vague "sportsbook fraud violation". There is absolutely no multi-accounting, identity manipulation, or fraudulent behavior associated with my account.  
​When I contacted support to formally dispute the restriction and requested the exact Terms of Service clause or betting log that triggered their system flag, their compliance and risk team stonewalled the inquiry. They stated they were "not able to share those details with you for security reasons" and declared the fund confiscation "final".  
​Confiscating a player's principal deposit using blanket risk-management clauses—while actively refusing to provide the accused user with any concrete evidence of wrongdoing—is a predatory practice. I am opening this accusation to warn the community and demand that Frogbet's representative either publish the specific logs proving their claims transparently on this thread or refund my initial deposit immediately.

Registered Email: trilece_tazhys@yahoo.com

​Scammer's Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3765945

​Reference Link (Frogbet's Official Thread): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.0

​Amount Scammed:  ~ $248

​Payment Method: Usdt

https://imgur.com/a/yE8aWzk

Ok, I've been watching this from... very far, Io perhaps, with telescope, as the case is too hot to jump in before. But... as we're seemingly going around and around and keep on returning to the square zero, with no foreseeable outcome...

Sure. Don't trust verify.
I have provided dozens of proofs and explained clearly why these users deserve a red trust.
[...]

May I exercise this? "Don't trust, verify,"? From both of you? bitbollo and Little Mouse?

I recall screenshots of conversation already shared to other members? Now, I won't say who do what, but I do have in my hand what seemingly to be the complete conversation, where almost each end of screenshot meet the beginning of the next one, that led me to believe it give little to zero manipulation, and I'd like to invite the other party to nudge me with their own version of entire screenshot, just to minimize the chance of ninja-edit by the first party.

Or, we can do the other way around by me posting the entire conversation I have in my possession by both of your permission?

Asking and jumping in because after reading them, I think the context given by those conversation plays a major role in the direction of this case.

I have replied several time to an user about why these have not been posted.
Part of these conversations are already here and have been confirmed completely by Little Mouse.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0

If you don't trust my word ok I would send full images, but after 6 days this should be already confirmed as detail...

It seems a kind late being skeptical, it's a scam denied for 10 consecutive days...

And you are a disgraceful piece of shit.

You are still acting like that kid, gentleman.

If you call me scammer again, I won't mind calling you bastard, disgraceful piece of shit again.

If anyone would start to ask again and again the same we are not ending to talk about the same things.

edit= PM sent.

[bitbollo]

More proofs about the scam. License required around 2 minutes to be verified
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino

High rollers require around 6-11 seconds!








Yeah, every 6-11 seconds there is A LUCKY WINNER high roller. Why LUCKY? Have you some one lost ? This has been taken in 5 minutes, only a LONG STREAK OF WINNERS WITH HIGH AMOUNT
Close and reopen the page. They would start to load again a long list of highrollers playing and winning meanwhile they have 0 activity.

They are just showing a fake activity.
Come on! they solved everything "take 100 USD and shut up - go to see the doctor!" and allow us to continue to scam !
They are just scammers, supporting scammer that are even providing fake traffic on their casino! This due diligence requires the time of a coffee.




It's an endless evidence to have a scam casino despite the team is still in contact. They have just promoted (like many others) with the same scheme, many scam website.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
Why they continue to not comment all of these evidences ?

[nutildah]

- "hey why escalate so fast - 7 days?" - or
- "hey have you play to the best tower game - in a scam website?"

That's not a rethorical question. Meanwhile we are justifing a scammer, someone is just losing money.  
What are the numbers of days that we need to wait before open a scam accusation? For how many days scammer can deny a scam/continue to call as "a team" ?

This is a petty reason to leave a red tag on somebody. He didn't even say what you're claiming he said. You misunderstood the context of Shishir99's metaphor and are using your misconception as the grounds for a red trust. Your interpretation of his behaviors is not shared by anybody else.


The last thing I have to say on the subject is you were right about Frogbet, but you should have stuck to that particular issue instead of dragging in several other issues, which you may or may not be right about. It would have been better to focus on the technical strength of your case against Frogbet rather than making it deeply personal, which complicated things and led to an unjust tagging.

[bitbollo]

.... that's why he just opened a full topic questioning my "mental health and my health in general". Go to see a doctor right?

...
Can we clarify after many days we can open a scam accusations without being public treated like a shit?
Can we clarify (so all users of forum can use this deouble standard next time) why this users has been allowed to deny there was a scam despite there was 3 pages of topic talking about the scam?
...

Same question not answered: I wait 7 days to post a scam accusation. I have been insulted all the time - including a full topic of harrassement.
For other "peasants" of the forum, how many months we have to be scammed before opening a scam accusation or being insulted by some sockpuppet?
How "peasants" that "are not productive", can be able to warn other users?
How many days are allowed these users to shill a casino/scam campaign manager despite they are scamming me and others?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594949.msg67173860#msg67173860

We have just confirmed they are scammers and there are dozens of way to make due diligence in less than 5 minutes.

After OP or Little Mouse, call them
- "the team"
- the best "tower game",
- hey ust 7 days they are absent, are you mad to call them  scammer?"
- take 100 USD and shut up about my scams
They are scam supporters and would be red tagged accordingly. You can also check their previous or "current" sponsorship to identify other scams. I continue to say opinions based on nothing.
If there are 10 pages of scams and all these evidences are true I would change idea about "its a personal thing" .
I don't see nothing personal here.
Since 10 pages of 2 topics are not enough to make a summary, I can continue to quote the same that has not changed and has been avoided to be answered:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67177664#msg67177664 Shisir99 supporting a scam after 7 days

[hugeblack]

I spent the past 3 hours reviewing everything mentioned, and waited for trust update -----> https://loyce.club/trust/2026-09-26_Sat_05.18h/2344286.html^[1] to obtain a more neutral assessment.

If you noticed, not many DT members were convinced by what you presented, so I can list the reasons that will lead to adding more negative trust, such as proving any of the following:
1. Relationship between LM and @naim027 farm.
2. LM continued to promote any scam project (after it was proven.)
3. LM uses an alt account to join a signature campaign or add known spammers to one of its campaigns.
4. LM steals any money deposited in escrow or intentionally misuses it.
5. LM defaults on any payments related to any signature campaign.

Overall I look forward to hearing the opinions of those who still trust LM.

[1]
Little Mouse's judgement is Trusted by:
1. wwzsocki (Trust: +10 / =2 / -0) (DT1 (-1) 1526 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Removed jeremypwr (Trust: +55 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (14) 6291 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Swordsoffreedom (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 234 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
3. DrBeer (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1881 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
4. avp2306 (Trust: neutral) (390 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
5. owlcatz (Trust: +47 / =0 / -0) (1052 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Fortify (Trust: +19 / =0 / -0) (299 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
7. LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +31 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (24) 12254 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
8. 7788bitcoin (Trust: neutral) (36 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Betwrong (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1344 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Removed klarki (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (5) 4760 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
10. The Sceptical Chymist (Trust: +30 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (32) 6381 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
11. |MINER| (Trust: neutral) (260 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
12. Finestream (Trust: neutral) (164 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
13. mirakal (Trust: +5 / =2 / -0) (319 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
14. BitcoinGirl.Club (Trust: +1 / =6 / -0) (1851 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
15. Eternad (Trust: +0 / =0 / -4) (424 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
16. bhadz (Trust: neutral) (145 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
17. eaLiTy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (502 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
18. Murat (Trust: +15 / =3 / -0) (322 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
19. Russlenat (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (590 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
20. AakZaki (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (7) 2290 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
21. xSkylarx (Trust: neutral) (113 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
22. Woodie (Trust: neutral) (882 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
23. goodpunt (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (163 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
24. ryzaadit (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (1402 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
25. Mahdirakib (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1119 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. Removed PX-Z (Trust: neutral) (1143 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
26. rdluffy (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1990 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
27. goldkingcoiner (Trust: neutral) (3125 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
28. Smartprofit (Trust: neutral) (2378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
29. GreatArkansas (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1425 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
30. dragonvslinux (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (2339 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
31. sheenshane (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1172 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
32. cryptoaddictchie (Trust: +1 / =2 / -0) (1623 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
33. Findingnemo (Trust: neutral) (1131 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
34. RGBTC (Trust: +4 / =1 / -0) (1140 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
35. lovesmayfamilis (Trust: +27 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (33) 5865 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
36. yhiaali3 (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2677 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
37. YOSHIE (Trust: +10 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (22) 1913 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
38. Coyster (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1475 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
39. Smartvirus (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (1378 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
40. NotATether (Trust: +8 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (9) 10323 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
41. ajanwalker (Trust: +0 / =1 / -2) (866 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
42. execijutiere (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (2210 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
43. Rruchi man (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (1341 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
44. Pokapoka124 (Trust: neutral) (584 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
45. _act_ (Trust: neutral) (1992 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
46. Wiwo (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (1121 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
47. Doan9269 (Trust: neutral) (862 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
48. Pandu Geddon (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (773 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
49. Crypto Library (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (1220 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
50. Z-tight (Trust: neutral) (1334 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
51. Jossque (Trust: neutral) (2749 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
52. Asiska02 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (900 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
53. ~speedx~ (Trust: neutral) (46 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
54. Die_empty (Trust: neutral) (1336 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
55. Hazink (Trust: +1 / =1 / -0) (451 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
56. DYING_S0UL (Trust: neutral) (1235 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
57. alastantiger (Trust: neutral) (911 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
58. SirJohnVonSlotty (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (1022 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
59. Z_MBFM (Trust: neutral) (504 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
60. Perfectbaby (Trust: neutral) (643 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
61. BabyBandit (Trust: neutral) (103 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
62. memehunter (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (1123 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
63. Wonder Work (Trust: +0 / =2 / -3) (304 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)
64. Chris_Farli (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Custom Trust list) (BPIP)


+ What was mentioned clearly indicates the need for LM to stop accepting any new campaigns before addressing the current questions.

[AB de Royse777]

3. LM uses an alt account to join a signature campaign or add known spammers to one of its campaigns.
4. LM steals any money deposited in escrow or intentionally misuses it.
5. LM defaults on any payments related to any signature campaign.

For an active campaign manager I don't think they have time to post to earn from the signature even from their main account. But anyway, those bold parts: You can put any random manager's name and prove that they do it if your sole intention is to destroy their reputation when you a have strong DT position.

+ What was mentioned clearly indicates the need for LM to stop accepting any new campaigns before addressing the current questions.

LM surely needs to work his homework better - one can argue if they want but not accepting any new campaigns before addressing the current questions (The above observation I assume) : Aren't you giving LM the burden. The burden is on bitbollo.

The 4 and 5 - it will be easily to know/guess by the way - Ask the campaign members who worked in their campaigns. You surely will find a few with unhappy feeling for every single manager.

[bitbollo]

It has been already proved that this site "frogbet" has been presented as legit since 24 Septmber after 10 days of scam.

...
I have paused them for indefinite time, until I can come with better contest idea.
...

I would not have a better contest idea for a scam. Still they have not left a negative trust on this website/confirming they are scammer
They send fake emails as "NO KYC SITE". https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67174787#msg67174787
They show also fake traffic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67180087#msg67180087
They are the same company behind a scam https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394

The misuse of escrow funds and trust of a newbie registered in AUGUST 2026 has been already proved here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
including insults. Please note that I had received few days of insults even if the scam was posted around 25 times here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

edit:
-moreover, not only with frogbet, he has continued for a few days to promote one site made by the same scam company https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/companies/3-102-945295-srl --> even if this explanation was already provided on forum ( there are at least 2 scams promoted here)

-I would call "spammer" someone that after 3 pages of topic in a casino, describing a a scam, would come to explain "how it's funny play tower game on this website"
How many days are allowed these users to shill a casino/scam campaign manager despite they are scamming me and others?

...

This is not the case. I was even not aware of all these crappy sites he has promoted. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810
There are still others that has scammed with the same scheme last year.
As I have already posted he has always made 0 due diligence for scam advertised, just to mantain a proper ratio of "1 scam 1 month".
https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/companies/3-102-945295-srl
The same company that has launched 5 scams now is launching a 6 scam! You can search by yourself....

....
LM surely needs to work his homework better - one can argue if they want but not accepting any new campaigns before addressing the current questions (The above observation I assume) : Aren't you giving LM the burden. The burden is on bitbollo.
...

Burden on me because I have exposed just few scam right?
Burden of what? You can just read my explanations about the scam again - share your evidences if any !

If there are 10 pages of scams and all these evidences are true I would change idea about "its a personal thing" . I don't see nothing personal here.
Since 10 pages of 2 topics are not enough to make a summary, I can continue to quote the same that has not changed and has been avoided to be answered:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

[AB de Royse777]

Burden on me

Burden on you to convince the DT members. You really understand less, talk unnecessarily exponential.