bitbollo needs help - Is it worth the blood?

[bitbollo]

All "opposition" can't answers to endorsement of a scam still today (frogbet is the same company of the scam called luckyanon).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394

Even this user will continue to argue about "100 usd" - remember yersterday the violence about the exact sum despite I have posted "around"?
Now he continues to avoid to read the same reply from the first post.
They continue to ask "TO PAY" because want hide the real issues posted in all of these scams. Likewise "why you don't shut up for these 100 USD?"

...

...
I am locking this topic and no need to follow up with it, if you need then you can unlock the scam accusation topic.

...
If you had also the review there is clearly the amount of 100 usd more or less. Don't try to nickpicking, when I see that "you surprised too much" I was mentioning your strange attitude to CONFIRM A SCAM but trying to QUESTIONING THE PENNY I MISS CALCULATED.
...

....
This issue has been well visibile for 7 days, you had to stop to make insinuations, that I have taken only a part of your argumentation.
Avoid to look on the pennies, avoid to attack GENERICALLY OTHER PEOPLE. What it should be more important is "support your client" because come on, he stole only 100 USD?!?
or WARNING IMMEDIATELY OTHER USERS TO AVOID TO DEPOSIT HERE?
....

...
You feel smart on harassing and trying to appear better than me "because come on its only 100USD?"
Anyone can easily READ what happens and THE PROOFS that have been posted. Your insinuations are already being discussed and dismantled, your self you can just "snip" and thats all:

It's evident you continue to twist the issue, "100 usd". the problem is marketing and promotion of a scam casino. It's all explained in scam accusation, I can just continue to quote all passages and confirm they have supported a scam for all these days.

As you can see in previous posts has been utterly discussed that the problem would not be "100 USD" I would avoid to talk about this point because after hundred of free donations this argumentation has no sense. The scam is related the trust of a scam casino. I have verified they are scam in less than 5 minutes. He has even returned escrow.
Guys, I would say in general, if you get scammed you have choosed to "trust" these users despite the evidences.

Whats next? There are other scams to be posted advertised in the same way.
Anyone could verify at least other 5 scams with the same design but I would not get my time abused after all these evidecens posted.

Since I read this topic everyday, I want to say one thing. Stop attacking persons including bitbollo himself and start talking about facts and let members involved in this whole situation reply themselves.
I see some red flags exposed, negative trusts made, serious scam accusation... and random posts that don't worth 2 cents ruining the discussion.
I wonder know when bitcointalkers will stop attacks and insults, and will reply to the subject professionally.

I have posted all evidences here.
I would not reply anymore to accuse baseless and the continue non sense about 100 USD.
Other users what are posting despite suspicious baseless like even an accusation to another fight of scammers?
Yeah he doesn't check the post history of gbianchi (maybe because he is not italian) or he doesn't know what he has done to fight the plague of scams but it's evident they are still not able to address these accusations:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 5 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

I haven't see many arguments for "opposition" on this flag despite "here there are 100 USD lets us to support a scam company with a new name".

[Free Market Capitalist]

Since the payment ($100 or whatever) has been paid, since 7 days or even 6 months in this business is not an issue at all (we have seen it all, projects, management, campaign managers can face problem sometimes it takes longer time than expected to be resolved) - Flag opposed. I am happy to see a good ending.

That's my reason to oppose the flag too.

And I'm not going to dwell on this too much—life is going too well for me to waste time and energy on arguments here. What I do want to comment on is the following:

➤ And now we're asking: Over the last six months, how many casinos/projects ended up being accused of being scams managed by the manager?

Anyone who wants to argue that Little Mouse basically runs campaigns for scam casino sites just needs to create another different type of flag, a newbie warning flag. Good luck with that by the way.

[bitbollo]

Since the payment ($100 or whatever) has been paid, since 7 days or even 6 months in this business is not an issue at all (we have seen it all, projects, management, campaign managers can face problem sometimes it takes longer time than expected to be resolved) - Flag opposed. I am happy to see a good ending.

That's my reason to oppose the flag too.

And I'm not going to dwell on this too much—life is going too well for me to waste time and energy on arguments here. What I do want to comment on is the following:

➤ And now we're asking: Over the last six months, how many casinos/projects ended up being accused of being scams managed by the manager?

Anyone who wants to argue that Little Mouse basically runs campaigns for scam casino sites just needs to create another different type of flag, a newbie warning flag. Good luck with that by the way.

Thats the reason I have opened a flag.
Exactly no one could answers to all of these scams and previous issues but continue to attack on me likewise "come on, just 100 USD of scam!"
Well done again! The more you continue to defend in such stupid and arrogant way the more people get aware of this scam!

...
I have posted all evidences here.
I would not reply anymore to accuse baseless and the continue non sense about 100 USD.
Other users what are posting despite suspicious baseless like even an accusation to another fight of scammers?
Yeah he doesn't check the post history of gbianchi (maybe because he is not italian) or he doesn't know what he has done to fight the plague of scams but it's evident they are still not able to address these accusations:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 5 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

I haven't see many arguments for "opposition" on this flag despite "here there are 100 USD lets us to support a scam company with a new name".

[bitbollo]

SCAMS Already known: frogbet.com/luckyanon (2) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394

The list can be expanded endless of all of these sites that have a very "short halflife" and have been promoted here for just a couple of months before rugging some one.

This was another scam heavily promoted in april/may 2026 MOBIT SCAM FROM MAY 2026 to AUGUST 2026
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5582765.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579792.0
https://monerica.com/site/mobit





Wow, it's so hard the industry, that all of these projects have lifes of a span of months and then ends with a scam... not closing operations. Scamming users in a bad way with a selective scam.  

SCAMS Already known: frogbet.com/luckyanon/mobit (3) PLUMP  SCAM FROM APRIL 2026 to MAY 2026

Since I don't care of been harassed by sock puppets (and now they understand what means being trusted) we have another scam project just promoted to add to the list, sincerely after 4 projects scam in less than a quarter I don't know really what a hell are you trusting all of these shits for a few pennies!

I've removed the signature and avatar pending a resolution to the situation.

In case you guys are not aware yet, it seems something is really off with plump casino. They have actively deleted the content in the ANN on their gambling section of the forum.

People are afraid we are witnessing a exit-scam taking place right now was I type this on my phone.

I hope that this is not the case, we have seen many of these in recently.  

Another casino - another endorsement - another short halflife.
Launched in April 2026 - Scam confirmed in May 2026


SCAMS Already known: frogbet.com/luckyanon/mobit/plump (4) TOMBOI SCAM FROM APRIL 2026 to AUGUST 2026

Again in April 2026 we have another campaign, another scam:

https://scamnot.me/en/report/approved/tomboi-exchange-scam-lost-250-monero/
This time we have tomboi - posted in Aprile 2026  and become a scam in May 2026


SCAMS Already known: frogbet.com/luckyanon/mobit/plump/tomboi (5)

Despite all of these experiences, we can identify at least 5 scams promoted here and problably there are some others.
They made comparison with services online from a dozen of year - likewise they have the same kind of trust.

In just 6 months there are at least 5 topics of SCAMS confirmed known: frogbet.com/luckyanon/mobit/plump/tomboi (5) all with the same scheme/all with the same selective scam/ all with the same ghosting approach.

Here you can see how a "DT" trusting a newbie and ignore all warnings https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369  

He still continues to sponsor this group of casinos likewise they are "the team"! That everyone knows has been made by scammers. They even confirm too!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation for all details since here the sockpuppet has tried the last tentative of a public shame to me.

Here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394
you can see all correlations with connected scam casino.

They can oppose to flag, continue to claim 100 USD WILL SOLVE ALL

MEANWHILE THEY HAVE JUST MISSED A FULL LIST OF 5 SCAMs in 6 MONTHS!



DON'T TRUST VERIFY! If you want to have a DT full of these bunch of scammers it's just your choice

YES 100 USD ARE AN OFFENSE TO THE WHOLE COMMUNITY SINCE IF YOU THINK THESE WILL DELETE ALL OF THESE SCAMS ADVERTISED DESPITE ALL POSSIBLE WARNINGS!

WITH FROGBET HE HAS JUST AVOIDED 25/30 messages! FOR 7 DAYS! REACTING WITH OFFENSES AND TRUSTING A NEWBIE EVEN WITH ESCROWED FUNDS!

Issues has been posted on 14th Sept - Negative Trust on 17thSept - Scam accusation (still with insult like "bastard and piece of shit) on 21th Sept



LIKE ALL OTHER TIMES THATS VERY PLAN AND SIMPLE

[JollyGood]

Your post caught my eye. Do you have any evidence to substantiate your claim about Little Mouse managing campaigns for as little as $10 per week?

Also, we all know that anything is possible in the forum. Some members that were involved in account farms were also huge surprises therefore if the naim027 account is connected in any capacity to Little Mouse then it will not even be a surprise. The only problem members would have with the allegation you made is the lack of evidence. It is easy for any member to make unsubstantiated claims against another, do you have any evidence?

Little Mouse is a scammer that manages campaigns for as low as $10 per week, meaning they are not really being "managed" in any sense of the word -- basic counting is not "managing", toddlers can do that. It is very probable that he is naim027 or a very close associate of his since the beginning of his scamming days. However, money rules around this place that is why so many members jump to defend him and provide him with positive reviews or opposition to the flag.  

[examplens]

This was another scam heavily promoted in april/may 2026 MOBIT SCAM FROM MAY 2026 to AUGUST 2026
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5582765.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5579792.0
https://monerica.com/site/mobit

Isn't it obvious from the screenshot you posted that Mobit solved this case in the first 24 hours? Although the scam accusation was opened immediately after the 2-hour delay, which can be said to be quite intolerant. It was still a technical problem. I followed this problem quite by accident
I don't like scammers either, but this is not a valid scam example (even the opposite), no matter who their campaign manager is.

[bitbollo]

Sorry if there are only 4 Scams and not 5 ! * Personally cant verify this claim - how It works exactly this URL?
 What I have to Say :? If they are not a Scam ok
If you look on this kind of sponsorship./ Campaign - There are at least other 5 that are completely offline After being classified as scam.
I have not reported but anyone could verify this Is Just a selection of scams.

Likewise frogbet the site ADVERTISED Still today Is the same Scam Just wit a new name.

It  Has becoming embarassing highlight every minimum error meanwhile anyone avoid to commments the whole rest of the Scam accusation.

*
https://mobit.exchange/complete/2575c62334ae4d77841900092a4acada

[examplens]

Sorry if there are only 4 Scams and not 5 ! * Personally cant verify this claim - how It works exactly this URL?
 What I have to Say :? If they are not a Scam ok
If you look on this kind of sponsorship./ Campaign - There are at least other 5 that are completely offline After being classified as scam.
I have not reported but anyone could verify this Is Just a selection of scams.

Mobit exchange, as well as most instant exchanges (practice in the industry), deletes all data about the order after a certain time. The famous no-log policy.
Feedback was written on August 30, Mobit confirmed that the case was resolved within 24 hours. Mobit wrote the signed message precisely for the reason that a specific order will not be available in checks like this one. It was expected that the order ID would have been automatically deleted from the server by today.

[bitbollo]

Well thank you. Glad to see they are not a scam.

I could post other more 5 scams of last year - anyone can verify - Just lock topic created / status of websiges.

 but considering there are 4 pretty valids examples of the same scheme (including frogbet that been shilled until today) the Scam accusation/flag remain pretty appropriate.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

[nutildah]

I knew this would happen the moment I saw the negative feedback on Little Mouse's account.
This is not about the money. This planned attack on Little Mouse with the help of some other people.
Don't you people see that the entire DT network is silent about this case? These people don't have the balls to talk about justice.

Now wait a minute. This is not the type of issue that should be responded to hastily. Its the type where emotions are running high and after the dust settles, people often come to their senses and correct their mistakes. I think Bitbollo's negative trust on you is wrong but I'm giving him time to demonstrate some reasonableness.

Little Mouse unintentionally hurt His Majesty bitbollo's ego, and this guy decided to go after him.

There's more to it than that. This frogbet account (and casino) is shady AF. They haven't been online in about 6 days... Its not because they are "too busy" to respond, its because they got outed as scammers earlier than intended.

And it is a problem if campaign managers repeatedly endorse scam products/services. "I couldn't have known they would scam" is a poor excuse which reflects a lack of basic judgment skills. LM should definitely be more selective and work harder to avoid introducing potential scams to the community.

Having said that, bitbollo's actions are overkill for this particular problem, especially the red tag on Shishir99. I supported the flag on frogbet and opposed the flag on Little Mouse. I'm hoping bitbollo will reconsider his stance and work to de-escalate the issue rather than leaving things fractured.

[AB de Royse777]

➤ And now we're asking: Over the last six months, how many casinos/projects ended up being accused of being scams managed by the manager?

Anyone who wants to argue that Little Mouse basically runs campaigns for scam casino sites just needs to create another different type of flag, a newbie warning flag. Good luck with that by the way.

This part will be interesting,

it is interesting, can we actually get some numbers/statistics on the volume of campaigns managed by all managers and compare the number of promoted projects with the number that later became involved in scam accusations or serious disputes?

Little Mouse got so many campaigns in the last a year I believe other managers including me of course sometimes felt frustrated just by seeing it. Many time I felt like - "what the hack, this client talked to me yesterday and today this fucker is launching the campaign".

When a manager handles one campaign, there may be a 1-in-100 chance that the project could potentially turn out to be a scam. If they manage 10 campaigns, that exposure to risk naturally increases and it become 10-in-100. Take more, the risk naturally keeps increasing. Of course, this doesn’t mean a campaign manager should stop taking on campaigns.

[nutildah]

When a manager handles one campaign, there may be a 1-in-100 chance that the project could potentially turn out to be a scam. If they manage 10 campaigns, that exposure to risk naturally increases and it become 10-in-100. Take more, the risk naturally keeps increasing. Of course, this doesn’t mean a campaign manager should stop taking on campaigns.

You're making it seem like its totally random whether you will end up promoting a scam or not. The fact is some managers are more likely to promote scams than others. It is 1000% up to the manager to weed out a bad project from the getgo, and they should not be immune from the consequences of lending credibility to scams. "Its just a cost of business" is not a reasonable excuse.

[AB de Royse777]

When a manager handles one campaign, there may be a 1-in-100 chance that the project could potentially turn out to be a scam. If they manage 10 campaigns, that exposure to risk naturally increases and it become 10-in-100. Take more, the risk naturally keeps increasing. Of course, this doesn’t mean a campaign manager should stop taking on campaigns.

You're making it seem like its totally random whether you will end up promoting a scam or not. The fact is some managers are more likely to promote scams than others. It is 1000% up to the manager to weed out a bad project from the getgo, and they should not be immune from the consequences of lending credibility to scams. "Its just a cost of business" is not a reasonable excuse.

Sorry I did not say that. Obviously the managers do their due diligence but here again we saw random people to become manager and associated with scam project. When the intension is bad, it is clearly noticeable. But good intention is not always immune to mistakes, we all do mistakes and learn something from it.

[nutildah]

Obviously the managers do their due diligence

Given the number of scam projects being promoted here pretty regularly, its not at all obvious.

but here again we saw random people to become manager and associated with scam project.

I'm not really sure what you mean by that or how it relates to this discussion.

When the intension is bad, it is clearly noticeable. But good intention is not always immune to mistakes, we all do mistakes and learn something from it.

I think the real problem doesn't have to do with "mistakes" so much as what is at the center of one's moral core. I don't personally think its a good idea to dismiss the effects of hurting others as just a natural part of business. Yeah, some scams are more unexpected than others, but you guys really haven't changed since this -- you seem to still hold the same views when it comes to selecting campaigns to manage.

[bitbollo]

Obviously the managers do their due diligence

Looks how they react once they have been informed to support a scam - the scammers! Its really interesting this defense, they things that "come on just another scam - take 100 USD and we will fix it"

edit: as you can see below there are several offenses and insults by this user. I would invite anyone to remove from trust list such low quality user that has not been able to complete a trade and reaction has been full of offenses despite admitted it was all true.

And you are a disgraceful piece of shit.

You are still acting like that kid, gentleman.

If you call me scammer again, I won't mind calling you bastard, disgraceful piece of shit again.

...
Yeah, some scams are more unexpected than others, but you guys really haven't changed since this -- you seem to still hold the same views when it comes to selecting campaigns to manage.

After 9 days "campaign manager" knows they are a scam - just changed name - they are still promoting here. There is no way they recognize a scam, AFTER ALL THIS DAY THEY ARE "THE TEAM"
It's evindent that the amount of lies spread by you in this topic are just overwhelming.

It's too hard to comment in the ratio of all these scams in just few months right? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67172535#msg67172535
Thats why with 100 USD I must shut up, right? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67172494#msg67172494

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

I think Bitbollo's negative trust on you is wrong but I'm giving him time to demonstrate some reasonableness.

If you check reference there is the evidence that this user has continued to shill/endorse the same casino that was already a rogue scam with 7 days of total absence (delay from deadline).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.msg67164618#msg67164618
Even he has the courage to argue "that has escalated fasted as light".
I don't know these countries, but I have never seen "lights" fast like 7 days... If even 7 days OF FUNDS STOLEN / PAYMENT NOT MADE (including insult in private and in public) is not enough for opening a scam accusation his judgement can't be trusted.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.msg67164879#msg67164879
Once Has been questione why he was just skipping the comments about the scam he decides to harrass me and create even this topic to try to defaming my account - even quote 28 users.Both are actions that doesn't deserve trust.
These morons doesn't realize that there are already investigations in ALL these scams made my SAME PEOPLE.

Imagine there is the scam of "coldcard" and this guy go in topic completely off topic chanting how it works well is hardware...
I don't understand this double standards.There are scam advertised literally 1 each month, by same companies that have already scammed.
Even if pointed out by reputable user (at this point, I don't know why I need to trust "Shishir99" or an account that at best can ask a loan on forum) this is the reaction of community?

Everyone continue to ask proofs and evidences, anyway we have confirmed up to nausea that=
- fail of escrow
- trust a newbie that was already a scam company
- insult and offenses despite warning for many days and multiplatform
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation

- continue promotion of the scam "they are the team" that has been absent for just 9 days = they have just changed name, even if he is aware HE IS STILL SHILLING THAT SHIT HERE
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino

- promotion of scams without due diligence (just a quick selection but there are also other, and one is going to scam soon)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

If forum administration, DT, and admin consider the same "quality" of user having these coackroaches posting scam and insulting please go ahead with those account and add them to your trust list.

[nutildah]

I think Bitbollo's negative trust on you is wrong but I'm giving him time to demonstrate some reasonableness.

If you check reference there is the evidence that this user has continued to shill/endorse the same casino that was already a rogue scam with 7 days of total absence (delay from deadline).

That's not really a valid reason to leave a red tag IMO. I don't think anybody is supporting this casino anymore and that's what matters.

Even he has the courage to argue "that has escalated fasted as light".
I don't know these countries, but I have never seen "lights" fast like 7 days... If even 7 days OF FUNDS STOLEN / PAYMENT NOT MADE (including insult in private and in public) is not enough for opening a scam accusation his judgement can't be trusted.

He was using "fast as light" as a metaphor to describe how quickly the situation escalated between yourself and Little Mouse. I didn't see it as meaning any particular offense. And I don't think he was implying you shouldn't open a scam accusation. On the contrary:

Frogbet might turn into a scam casino, and they may get negative feedback for their actions. But I think your negative feedback on Little Mouse in this case became a personal issue rather than a financial dispute. He insulted you a couple of times, and you did the same by calling him a scammer multiple times, even though he is just a campaign manager.

You two should sit together, have some coffee, and fix this mess. Take a break, come back with fresh mind and I am sure that will help.

You may take personal offense to the way he worded things but to everyone else it looks like an earnest attempt to help diffuse the situation.

[bitbollo]

...

I sent around 20/25 messages to Little Mouse and frogbet about the stolen deposit.
he just replied with insults for a few days, and this has escaleted. After 7 days of STOLEN FUNDS - BY A WEBSITE THAT HAS ALREADY MADE ANOTHER SCAM CALLED LUCKYANON - what is "FAST" ?
Because I have opened A SCAM ACCUSATION AFTER 7 DAYS? And they are still talking about "the tower game" so beautiful in a scam site?
We can continue to promote the beatiful art of @yogg after we have confirmed that he is a scammer right?
Or again another example, after how many days should be warned the scam of coldkey or coldcard? 

The whole comments by this users have justr tried to dissimulate the scam - including open a full topic to harass me.
If a reputable user is treated like shit despite all these evidences, please add these users to the trust list and DT.
I continue to see the general intention of the thread, confirmed = continue to derail on the main point that is the basic of the scam accusation and of these red trust.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

Since these users are still supporting WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE these scam I don't see why a red tag is inappropriate IMHO
FROGBET is the same scam casino as LUCKYANON https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394
Once they present them as "the team" and try to promote again after going rogue on trust pilot and being absent for 9 days its an evidence of being voluntary scammers.

[Shishir99]

Now wait a minute. This is not the type of issue that should be responded to hastily. Its the type where emotions are running high and after the dust settles, people often come to their senses and correct their mistakes. I think Bitbollo's negative trust on you is wrong but I'm giving him time to demonstrate some reasonableness.

Makes sense, and I agree with that.
I tried not to overreact and decided to apologize for my behaviour. This is not my typical response on the forum. I am much calmer when I engage with people. However, my wording might sound rude; if so, it is due to the language barrier. As I said, I tried not to be rude. But each time I said something, he replied to me with insults like suckpuppet, shill, scammer, spammer, and so on. It is really hard to keep calm when I don't think I am any of that. I approached them in a friendly way, but he got offended.

I respect old timers. I even apologized for my behaviour at some point. Did you see how he responded to my apology?

You are the same lord right?

[bitbollo]

...

I sent around 20/25 messages to Little Mouse and frogbet about the stolen deposit.
he just replied with insults for a few days, and this has escaleted. After 7 days of STOLEN FUNDS - BY A WEBSITE THAT HAS ALREADY MADE ANOTHER SCAM CALLED LUCKYANON - what is "FAST" ?
Because I have opened A SCAM ACCUSATION AFTER 7 DAYS? And they are still talking about "the tower game" so beautiful in a scam site?
We can continue to promote the beatiful art of @yogg after we have confirmed that he is a scammer right?
Or again another example, after how many days should be warned the scam of coldkey or coldcard?  

The whole comments by this users have justr tried to dissimulate the scam - including open a full topic to harass me.
If a reputable user is treated like shit despite all these evidences, please add these users to the trust list and DT.
I continue to see the general intention of the thread, confirmed = continue to derail on the main point that is the basic of the scam accusation and of these red trust.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 scam accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67168369#msg67168369 Links of warnings they was not answering since many days / trust a newbie as "team"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171810#msg67171810 4 scams of the last 6 months (all with the same scheme)

Since these users are still supporting WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE these scam I don't see why a red tag is inappropriate IMHO
FROGBET is the same scam casino as LUCKYANON https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394
Once they present them as "the team" and try to promote again after going rogue on trust pilot and being absent for 9 days its an evidence of being voluntary scammers.

Not escalated ikewise quoting 28 users that trust my reputwtion?
Scam supporters would not apology and continue to shill a Scam casino.
Anyone could decide what DESERVE to be trusted. Evidently you are skipping 2 topis and 8 Pages of accusations.
There Is another bunch of sites not posted - all the same Scam - all the same manager - and even another that is Just scamming right now with abitrary constrictions ,.promoted.by another scam licence. Same Scam as frogbet.

They Just change name. And use the same license

Due diligence? Anyone can verify in a matter of minutes.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67171394#msg67171394 Links with sister scam casino

Continue to deny all of these Scams and support even this behaviour doesn't DESERVE any kind of trust.

[Free Market Capitalist]

LM should definitely be more selective and work harder to avoid introducing potential scams to the community.

I strongly agree with this. I remember a few years ago when he wasn't running many campaigns—maybe three or four. Over time, he's become the manager who runs the most campaigns (not the one that handles the most money overall or has the most slots, but it's a big step). I suppose that during that growth phase, he tried to take on as many campaigns as he could. Now that he's matured as a manager, perhaps it's time for him to focus on quality rather than quantity, thereby avoiding any that might be potential scams.