[b][SCAM ACCUSATION] Frogbet.com - Unjustified Confiscation of $200[/b]

[Halabaku]

Frogbet has permanently restricted my account and confiscated my ~ $248 deposit under the guise of a vague "sportsbook fraud violation". There is absolutely no multi-accounting, identity manipulation, or fraudulent behavior associated with my account.  
​When I contacted support to formally dispute the restriction and requested the exact Terms of Service clause or betting log that triggered their system flag, their compliance and risk team stonewalled the inquiry. They stated they were "not able to share those details with you for security reasons" and declared the fund confiscation "final".  
​Confiscating a player's principal deposit using blanket risk-management clauses—while actively refusing to provide the accused user with any concrete evidence of wrongdoing—is a predatory practice. I am opening this accusation to warn the community and demand that Frogbet's representative either publish the specific logs proving their claims transparently on this thread or refund my initial deposit immediately.

Registered Email: trilece_tazhys@yahoo.com

​Scammer's Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3765945

​Reference Link (Frogbet's Official Thread): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5591848.0

​Amount Scammed:  ~ $248

​Payment Method: Usdt

https://imgur.com/a/yE8aWzk

[Halabaku]

Anyone here can mention their OP in this thread to gain attention?

[holydarkness]

frogbet, duckdice, bits, betz, even the local ole7. You sure collect a lot of cases of "unjustified confiscation" from a lot of casinos, all from sportsbook with questionable betting strategy. You sure the problem is not in your betting preferences and is actually with them and their provider? Because it seemed like the provider finally catching up on you with their flags.

[bitbollo]

The same users promoting this scam,  seems are still in contact with these scammers (they are the same license behind another scam called LuckyAnon)

The team member I'm in contact has confirmed me that $100 has been added to bitbollo's frogbet account, as it was supposed to be.

... I have paused them for indefinite time, until I can come up with better contest idea.

Their OP is absence since awhile and this is a scam confirmed. You can check here how they have harrassed and defended the manager that for a dozen of days have denied they where scammers: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0

[Halabaku]

frogbet, duckdice, bits, betz, even the local ole7. You sure collect a lot of cases of "unjustified confiscation" from a lot of casinos, all from sportsbook with questionable betting strategy. You sure the problem is not in your betting preferences and is actually with them and their provider? Because it seemed like the provider finally catching up on you with their flags.

How about we take from this perspective. I have 200+ accounts on different bookies and casinos where i place sports bets and from that total only those that i have opened disputes created problems and the rest have paid me ? The difference is enormous i guess, and between those with disputes Bitz.io managed to acknowledge their error and paid me back. How about the rest has made errors too ? And seeing that others have also complains about those casinos makes the whole thing clear. Im sure others will approve my dispute also here. All of them have not clear proof for what they claim and some have problem with wining players like me. So the reason i have so many account is because i win in all of them so i get limited or they try to lock me up. Lets be real here. Like "low risk strategy" ? What else is next ?

[yahoo62278]

frogbet, duckdice, bits, betz, even the local ole7. You sure collect a lot of cases of "unjustified confiscation" from a lot of casinos, all from sportsbook with questionable betting strategy. You sure the problem is not in your betting preferences and is actually with them and their provider? Because it seemed like the provider finally catching up on you with their flags.

How about we take from this perspective. I have 200+ accounts on different bookies and casinos where i place sports bets and from that total only those that i have opened disputes created problems and the rest have paid me ? The difference is enormous i guess, and between those with disputes Bitz.io managed to acknowledge their error and paid me back. How about the rest has made errors too ? And seeing that others have also complains about those casinos makes the whole thing clear. Im sure others will approve my dispute also here. All of them have not clear proof for what they claim and some have problem with wining players like me. So the reason i have so many account is because i win in all of them so i get limited or they try to lock me up. Lets be real here. Like "low risk strategy" ? What else is next ?

The bolded part is all I am commenting on but do you have multiple accounts on these sites to bypass limits?

Either way, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 here is another accusation against them. They have 3 tags on their account at this point and haven't been online for 9 days now since being called out. I don't see them returning anytime soon.

[notblox1]

I dont think Frogbet is coming back in forum again, but you can try contacting member LittleMouse who managed one of their campaigns here.
You should post more evidence and screenshots against them if you have, but I see they already have negative feedback on their profile.
All new casinos are risky and I dont like sending a lot of coins there, except smaller amounts for testing purposes.
 

[Agbe]

They stated they were "not able to share those details with you for security reasons" and declared the fund confiscation "final".  

This is where I am also interested. A security reason that the owner of the account can't know the reason why his account is flag or restricted. Casinos should tell the reasons why they restrict accounts and if they don't want to tell them, it means they have plan to scam the person but $248 is not a big amount for a casino to scam. Unless they are poor company. Restricting deposit account without good explanation does not look right.

[Halabaku]

frogbet, duckdice, bits, betz, even the local ole7. You sure collect a lot of cases of "unjustified confiscation" from a lot of casinos, all from sportsbook with questionable betting strategy. You sure the problem is not in your betting preferences and is actually with them and their provider? Because it seemed like the provider finally catching up on you with their flags.

How about we take from this perspective. I have 200+ accounts on different bookies and casinos where i place sports bets and from that total only those that i have opened disputes created problems and the rest have paid me ? The difference is enormous i guess, and between those with disputes Bitz.io managed to acknowledge their error and paid me back. How about the rest has made errors too ? And seeing that others have also complains about those casinos makes the whole thing clear. Im sure others will approve my dispute also here. All of them have not clear proof for what they claim and some have problem with wining players like me. So the reason i have so many account is because i win in all of them so i get limited or they try to lock me up. Lets be real here. Like "low risk strategy" ? What else is next ?

The bolded part is all I am commenting on but do you have multiple accounts on these sites to bypass limits?

Either way, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0 here is another accusation against them. They have 3 tags on their account at this point and haven't been online for 9 days now since being called out. I don't see them returning anytime soon.

There is no double accounting on any of them. There are tons of casinos and bookie to play from. In the end on each and every dispute there is no mention of double accounting as the reason. All they have are are some vague terms and false positive arbitrage from maybe their ai or software, or its just them using that to scam.

[bitbollo]

They are also showing fake traffic
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67180087#msg67180087
They are scammers and are not hiding at all. Campaign Manager has continued to search "better contest idea".

...
I have paused them for indefinite time, until I can come with better contest idea.
...

Would you have better contest idea?
This is the confirmation of dealing with scammers despite all of these evidences. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.msg67182111#msg67182111

Once I have seen the harsh reaction with personal offense/long delay for resolution/ a full topic to HARRASS ME https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0
It was evident this was just not "a classic scam" but something that they would be ready to waste time/energy.
Just to look people defending this and their trust

They will not admit you have been scammed, as they have done already with me. The scam has been posted on 14th September.
Still they are trying to create some noise and fog launching random accusation, but 11 pages of evidences are there.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594724.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5594694.0

[holydarkness]

frogbet, duckdice, bits, betz, even the local ole7. You sure collect a lot of cases of "unjustified confiscation" from a lot of casinos, all from sportsbook with questionable betting strategy. You sure the problem is not in your betting preferences and is actually with them and their provider? Because it seemed like the provider finally catching up on you with their flags.

How about we take from this perspective. I have 200+ accounts on different bookies and casinos where i place sports bets and from that total only those that i have opened disputes created problems and the rest have paid me ? The difference is enormous i guess, and between those with disputes Bitz.io managed to acknowledge their error and paid me back. How about the rest has made errors too ? And seeing that others have also complains about those casinos makes the whole thing clear. Im sure others will approve my dispute also here. All of them have not clear proof for what they claim and some have problem with wining players like me. So the reason i have so many account is because i win in all of them so i get limited or they try to lock me up. Lets be real here. Like "low risk strategy" ? What else is next ?

The point still stands. One is coincidence [or an error], two is discouraging, three? It's borderline to ask your betting preferences and strategy as better and safer approach. Especially given you said you have 200+ accounts on --I'll assume, given you said no double account-- 200 casinos. Out of the two hundreds, there are huge chances casinos share same provider.

Even with this casino's repu being currently questioned, the point also still stand: that the provider finally catched up with you. Some of these hundreds of casinos even limit you, a hint pointing toward questionable betting preference.