Where to play high stakes online poker with crypto?

[Riberox]

 I’m looking into high-stakes online poker rooms that accept crypto and wanted to get some feedback from people who have actually used them.

 I’ve listed 5 options in the poll. If your preferred room isn’t listed, please vote **Other** and specify which one below.

 I’m particularly interested in:

 -No KYC preferred (i am in USA)
- Deposit/withdrawal experience
- Supported cryptocurrencies
- Game selection and high-stakes limits
- Overall player experience

 Which platform would you choose for high-stakes crypto poker, and why?

 If you select **Other**, please name the platform and share your experience.

[HunterXZoldyck]

I’m looking into high-stakes online poker rooms that accept crypto and wanted to get some feedback from people who have actually used them.

 I’ve listed 5 options in the poll. If your preferred room isn’t listed, please vote **Other** and specify which one below.

 I’m particularly interested in:

 -No KYC preferred (i am in USA)
- Deposit/withdrawal experience
- Supported cryptocurrencies
- Game selection and high-stakes limits
- Overall player experience

 Which platform would you choose for high-stakes crypto poker, and why?

 If you select **Other**, please name the platform and share your experience.

The PlayBlind angle is interesting mainly because of the on-chain verification. If the shuffle proofs are independently verifiable, that is a much more useful transparency feature than just saying ‘our RNG is fair.’

[LingYao]

GG is still the obvious established option for me. I like that crypto deposits/withdrawals are supported, although the withdrawal rules are not exactly instant in every case

[OXONE BROTHER]

I’m looking into high-stakes online poker rooms that accept crypto and wanted to get some feedback from people who have actually used them.

 I’ve listed 5 options in the poll. If your preferred room isn’t listed, please vote **Other** and specify which one below.

 I’m particularly interested in:

 -No KYC preferred (i am in USA)
- Deposit/withdrawal experience
- Supported cryptocurrencies
- Game selection and high-stakes limits
- Overall player experience

 Which platform would you choose for high-stakes crypto poker, and why?

 If you select **Other**, please name the platform and share your experience.

The PlayBlind angle is interesting mainly because of the on-chain verification. If the shuffle proofs are independently verifiable, that is a much more useful transparency feature than just saying ‘our RNG is fair.’

Zero rake is what caught my attention with PlayBlind. The advertiser-sponsored model is pretty different from the normal poker-room setup. Would like to hear from people actually playing there at higher stakes

[TheSoapKing]

GG is still the obvious established option for me. I like that crypto deposits/withdrawals are supported, although the withdrawal rules are not exactly instant in every case

I would be careful with CoinPoker based on some of the player complaints I've seen. That doesn't prove dealing is suspicious, but I'd want to see the evidence and the site's response before putting serious money there.

[Zee Minho]

I’ve played on GG before and the main advantage is obviously the size and established player pool. For serious stakes that matters a lot. Still, the rake can become significant, so a genuine zero-rake model like PlayBlind is worth looking into.

[Gerrylope]

The thing that i like on with PlayBlind is the combination of player-created tables and zero rake. High-stakes players should have more control over the games they want to play, and avoiding traditional rake could make a big difference over a large sample

[DanWalker]

If No-KYC is your main criterion and you are playing from USA, to be honest your option are quite limited.

As far as I know CoinPoker is No-KYC crypto poker room. I don't play there anymore due to various complaints, but back when I did, there was no hassle regarding document upload. Plus, you don't even need any VPN, it is accessible from pretty much anywhere.

Currently I only prefer Stake Poker, although need KYC but safe and smooth experience.

[Sandieego]

The thing that i like on with PlayBlind is the combination of player-created tables and zero rake. High-stakes players should have more control over the games they want to play, and avoiding traditional rake could make a big difference over a large sample

GG remains one of the safer established choices in my opinion simply because there is a huge existing ecosystem and plenty of games. But for someone specifically interested in crypto-native poker, PlayBlind has some interesting ideas that traditional rooms don't really offer.

[TeemSuder]

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

[KiaKia]

Something is quit wrong with this thread, almost all 7 replies are from accounts with negative trust or accounts with zero merits, what are you trying to play here OP? You can't tell me that you don't know these accounts.

The only legit reply in here starts with DanWalker, someone please tell me you noticed this too?
It's like a co-ordinated content.

[Zazangs312]

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

[Oshosondy]

No KYC preferred (i am in USA)

Make sure you read the terms of service of the gambling site because most gambling sites do not allow people living in the United States to gamble on their site, but few gambling sites have another domain for United States customers. Do not let no KYC make you think the gambling site will not know your IP addresses.

[DanWalker]

Something is quit wrong with this thread, almost all 7 replies are from accounts with negative trust or accounts with zero merits, what are you trying to play here OP? You can't tell me that you don't know these accounts.

The only legit reply in here starts with DanWalker, someone please tell me you noticed this too?
It's like a co-ordinated content.

hmm, It seems like this thread is being spammed by a group.

And trying to promote a suspicious and scam project.

Please be cautious and do your own research before engaging.

[hotrightnow]

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

[angelstx]

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

[acroman08]

Something is quit wrong with this thread, almost all 7 replies are from accounts with negative trust or accounts with zero merits, what are you trying to play here OP? You can't tell me that you don't know these accounts.

The only legit reply in here starts with DanWalker, someone please tell me you noticed this too?
It's like a co-ordinated content.

The account is probably controlled by one person. Their goal here is to advertise PlayBlind.com, which is a scam website(check this thread created by Zwei), they've been doing this for a bit now.

Check these other threads Is there a non-KYC crypto poker site?, Where can I play Online Poker with Bitcoin?, you'll see that both of these threads are advertising PlayBlind.com.

[shendy]

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

[Riberox]

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

The zero-rake model is probably the biggest reason I would test PlayBlind. Obviously I’d want to understand the advertiser-sponsored model and make sure there aren't hidden costs, but replacing traditional rake with advertising is an interesting experiment

Instant crypto withdrawals are another major point for me. At high stakes I don't really want to wait around for a manual withdrawal process. PlayBlind consistently delivers genuinely instant withdrawals; a meaningful advantage rather than just another marketing feature

true

i do not like playblind graphics though, quite dated compared to GG. but overall a better play

  pb is goat, you know you can change the theme if you dont like it right

consensus is quite clear, but as always, gambling should be for fun only, most poker players lose longterm just remeember that

appreciate everyone for their insight. I had not actually tried playblind myself before, but ive been on it since last night and i can see the appeal, definitely although traffic could be higher