 |
September 28, 2026, 06:39:22 PM |
|
I realize a story like this may draw some jokes or sarcastic comments, and that's fine. What I'm really hoping for is practical advice from anyone who has been through a similar compliance freeze, or who knows how these cases usually play out. Thank you in advance to everyone who takes the time to share a useful tip on how best to proceed.
A note up front: "Alex Benson," who replies on behalf of Cropty support, is a bot. The replies are smooth and competent, but there is no human support agent behind the name.
On September 2, the client noticed he couldn't make any transfers from his USDT TRC20 wallet on Cropty. The app was up to date, the internet connection was stable, and he had energy credits for transactions. He contacted support. "Alex Benson" replied quickly that the account was under an AML/KYC review, so on-chain withdrawals and internal P2P transfers were temporarily disabled. He asked for a government ID, a selfie holding the ID, proof of address, and an explanation of the source of funds.
The client sent a detailed reply the same day. He agreed to the review but first asked for the basics: a case reference number, the TXID of the transaction that triggered the review, the specific risk flag, the regulatory basis for the review, and the contact details of the assigned compliance officer. He also asked for a secure channel for the documents, such as Sumsub, Onfido, or an in-app upload, and a clear timeline for the review. He got almost none of this. The review details, he was told, could only be shared by the compliance team "if they decide it is appropriate," and he was asked to simply send the documents by email.
On September 3, the client submitted the full package: a residence permit from a European country, a selfie holding the document, proof of address, and a Source of Funds Statement. Support confirmed receipt and said the package appeared complete. The review timeline was given as "several days to several months," and withdrawals remained blocked.
On September 14, the client followed up, again asking for a case number and at least an estimated timeline. No case number was provided; he was told to keep writing in the same thread. There is no guaranteed timeline, and the restrictions remain in place.
On September 16, the client proposed an alternative: if the funds could not be released to his address, they should be returned to the original sending address. "Alex Benson" replied that the proposal had been forwarded to the compliance specialists, but a return is not guaranteed. It may only be possible after the review is completed and if the originating address can be verified as belonging to the lawful source of the funds.
Status so far: the funds have been frozen for almost a month. There is no case number, no contact with a human compliance officer, and no timeline. All communication goes through a support bot.
|