Get the 100% Deposit Bonus on BullBet | A game with a new idea

[cashgammon]

Hello All,

BullBet is a fast, skill‑based prediction game where players choose Bull or Bear before each round begins.
The game combines real BTC price movement with crowd influence, creating a fair and exciting PvP experience.

🟩 1. How Each Round Works

The system collects 5 BTC price ticks
Every round is made of 5 price results taken over time.

Example:

Tick 1 => 86415.46
Tick 2  => 86416.11
Tick 3 =>  86413.42
Tick 4  => 86414.20
Tick 5 => 86418.60

When Tick #5 arrives, the round is complete.


🟧 2. Momentum is calculated

Momentum shows how BTC moved during the round:

Momentum = Tick5 − Tick1
Positive momentum → BTC went up
Negative momentum → BTC went down

🟥 3. Crowd Matrix (Player Influence)

Players choose Bull or Bear and place their bets.

The system counts:

Bull Total
Bear Total

This creates the Crowd Impact.

🟦 4. Final Impact Score

The winner is determined by your final formula:

Impact Score = Momentum + (Bull - Bear) / 10

This blends : Real market movement and Player influence into one fair result.

🟩 5. Winner Rules

Impact Score > 0 → Bull wins
Impact Score < 0 → Bear wins
Impact Score = 0 → Draw / Refund

Simple and transparent.

🟧 6. Betting Rules

To keep the game fair:

Players can only place bets during Tick #1

When Tick #2 starts, betting is locked
Tick #2 → Tick #5 are closed to prevent late advantage
This ensures everyone enters the round under the same conditions.

🟦 7. Payout

The payout is straightforward:

Bet 10 USDT → Win 10 USDT profit

Total return = 20 USDT

No complicated multipliers, no hidden rules.

Licensing applies to games where the operator determines the outcome.
Here the operator doesn’t generate anything, BTC price + user votes decide the result.



Get 100% deposit bonus by first deposit.

Example:

Deposit 50 USD -> Get Free 50 USD -> You get total 100 USD

or Deposit 100 USD -> Get free 100 USD -> You get total 200 USD

There are no any limits on withdrawals.
only there is 10% withdrawal fee



If you have any suggestions, please let me know.

This is our third project.

[Cointxz]

What exchange do you use as reference for the price? It’s important to make that information transparent so user can cross examine the result of each round.

Bankroll transparency is good feature on a casino like this that has no reputation to offer like licensed, background and previous transactions.

This game is being offered by many DEX and some casino like Rollbit. I’m not sure if there will be lots of interest if you solely offer this game. Maybe add some more games and introduce a leverage feature?

[cashgammon]

What exchange do you use as reference for the price? It’s important to make that information transparent so user can cross examine the result of each round.

Bankroll transparency is good feature on a casino like this that has no reputation to offer like licensed, background and previous transactions.

This game is being offered by many DEX and some casino like Rollbit. I’m not sure if there will be lots of interest if you solely offer this game. Maybe add some more games and introduce a leverage feature?

Hi, we use coingecko for getting real btc price and exchange etc...

We developed this game entirely from our own original idea, and we haven't seen anything like it anywhere else.

[Charles-Tim]

What exchange do you use as reference for the price? It’s important to make that information transparent so user can cross examine the result of each round.

Bankroll transparency is good feature on a casino like this that has no reputation to offer like licensed, background and previous transactions.

This game is being offered by many DEX and some casino like Rollbit. I’m not sure if there will be lots of interest if you solely offer this game. Maybe add some more games and introduce a leverage feature?

You just wanted me to make mistake and I deleted my first post which is this:

This is just another no license gambling site that is advertised by a scammer

If you have any suggestions, please let me know.

Make sure you have a good reputation in a way nobody will give you negative trust on this forum before bringing a gambling site to this forum.

This kind of service is becoming too common on this forum, so expect negative trust immediately I see another site like this.

What exchange do you use as reference for the price? It’s important to make that information transparent so user can cross examine the result of each round.

Bankroll transparency is good feature on a casino like this that has no reputation to offer like licensed, background and previous transactions.

This game is being offered by many DEX and some casino like Rollbit. I’m not sure if there will be lots of interest if you solely offer this game. Maybe add some more games and introduce a leverage feature?

What kind of post is this? You disregarded what I posted and making it look as if it can be a legit gambling site. Rollbit that you mentioned is licensed, but why not post that cashgammon should address the issue of license that I used to accuse him that his gambling site is not legit?

[yahoo62278]

10% fee on every withdraw? That seems insanely high. I don't think you will find many players willing to lose 10% on every withdraw unless they get the 100% depo on every deposit and that's not sustainable. You might rethink the decision to have your wd fee so high.

[TheAndy500]

This is just another no license gambling site that is advertised by a scammer

Just a few years ago, casino licensing was not welcomed on this decentralized forum. A casino license requires the implementation of AML/KYC policies, something that directly clashes with Satoshi's manifesto and philosophy of decentralization.
I understand that mainstream regulations are useful because they protect people who aren't necessarily aware of the risks. However, in a decentralized world, it works the other way around.

You're entitled to your opinion, but accusing someone of scamming simply because they don't have a license is, in my opinion, overreacting.

[Cointxz]

What exchange do you use as reference for the price? It’s important to make that information transparent so user can cross examine the result of each round.

Bankroll transparency is good feature on a casino like this that has no reputation to offer like licensed, background and previous transactions.

This game is being offered by many DEX and some casino like Rollbit. I’m not sure if there will be lots of interest if you solely offer this game. Maybe add some more games and introduce a leverage feature?

You just wanted me to make mistake and I deleted my first post which is this:

This is just another no license gambling site that is advertised by a scam

I honestly don’t know what you mean by this but my post is merely just a comment for improvement by answering his question for suggestion without an initial judgement since there’s still no proof that it’s scam.

It’s my personal opinion to not consider a casino as an immediate scam just because it has no license but you are always free to assume that way. I’m sorry if I offended you if you think that’s my intention which is not.

You can check Bustabit. It has no license but it operates since 2014. I’m not suggesting this casino is on par with Bustabit when it comes trust but it’s like giving new casino a chance to showcase their service here.

What kind of post is this? You disregarded what I posted and making it look as if it can be a legit gambling site. Rollbit that you mentioned is licensed, but why not post that cashgammon should address the issue of license that I used to accuse him that his gambling site is not legit?

I mentioned Rollbit because it offers the same category game. Again, my post is not related to your post that regards with license. It purely based on the game aspect.

[Charles-Tim]

Just a few years ago, casino licensing was not welcomed on this decentralized forum. A casino license requires the implementation of AML/KYC policies, something that directly clashes with Satoshi's manifesto and philosophy of decentralization.
I understand that mainstream regulations are useful because they protect people who aren't necessarily aware of the risks. However, in a decentralized world, it works the other way around.

You're entitled to your opinion, but accusing someone of scamming simply because they don't have a license is, in my opinion, overreacting.

I would not have discussed about the license, but the site was very new also which means no reputation. Its domain was created just 4 days ago and no form of advertisement which might mean lesser chance of scam, but not completely eliminate scam.

Let us see how it goes, but for now, this is not a site that I can recommend. But let us see what will happen. He might prove me wrong.

[TheAndy500]

Just a few years ago, casino licensing was not welcomed on this decentralized forum. A casino license requires the implementation of AML/KYC policies, something that directly clashes with Satoshi's manifesto and philosophy of decentralization.
I understand that mainstream regulations are useful because they protect people who aren't necessarily aware of the risks. However, in a decentralized world, it works the other way around.

You're entitled to your opinion, but accusing someone of scamming simply because they don't have a license is, in my opinion, overreacting.

I would not have discussed about the license, but the site was very new also which means no reputation. Its domain was created just 4 days ago and no form of advertisement which might mean lesser chance of scam, but no completely eliminate scam.

Let us see how it goes, but for now, this is not a site that I can recommend. But let us see what will happen. He might prove me wrong.

Following your line of thinking, we should initially mark all new users offering services as scams and give them a chance to prove they're not. In my opinion, that's not how the trust system works.

[Charles-Tim]

Following your line of thinking, we should initially mark all new users offering services as scams and give them a chance to prove they're not. In my opinion, that's not how the trust system works.

No, you can noticed that I did not mark all of them to be suspicious, but only selected few like this one. I will remove the negative trust ones I noticed the site is probably legit.

I will be following this thread and also check any new threads created about the gambling site.

[TheAndy500]

Following your line of thinking, we should initially mark all new users offering services as scams and give them a chance to prove they're not. In my opinion, that's not how the trust system works.

No, you can noticed that I did not mark all of them to be suspicious, but only selected few like this one. I will remove the negative trust ones I noticed the site is probably legit.

I will be following this thread and also check any new threads created about the gambling site.

The point is that you mark them not as suspicious, but as scam just because they are new.

[Perfectbaby]

Following your line of thinking, we should initially mark all new users offering services as scams and give them a chance to prove they're not. In my opinion, that's not how the trust system works.

No, you can noticed that I did not mark all of them to be suspicious, but only selected few like this one. I will remove the negative trust ones I noticed the site is probably legit.

I will be following this thread and also check any new threads created about the gambling site.

The point is that you mark them not as suspicious, but as scam just because they are new.

From what I am suspecting, he didn't just mark them Red but he was suspicious of the site.
Anyway, any trust given can be reversed provided they proved themselves otherwise.
Again, I do not think this site should be either be trusted because they own no operational license, meaning anyone using this site is at their own risk.
Have you also take a look at their withdrawal fee? 10% of their withdrawal, meaning if I had winning of 100$ they would deduct exactly 10$ from my winning amount.

[TheAndy500]

From what I am suspecting, he didn't just mark them Red but he was suspicious of the site.
Anyway, any trust given can be reversed provided they proved themselves otherwise.
Again, I do not think this site should be either be trusted because they own no operational license, meaning anyone using this site is at their own risk.
Have you also take a look at their withdrawal fee? 10% of their withdrawal, meaning if I had winning of 100$ they would deduct exactly 10$ from my winning amount.

I haven't tested the website, so I don't have an opinion on it yet.

[Tetu100]

Following your line of thinking, we should initially mark all new users offering services as scams and give them a chance to prove they're not. In my opinion, that's not how the trust system works.

No, you can noticed that I did not mark all of them to be suspicious, but only selected few like this one. I will remove the negative trust ones I noticed the site is probably legit.

I will be following this thread and also check any new threads created about the gambling site.

The point is that you mark them not as suspicious, but as scam just because they are new.

I think this is a better opportunity for them to prove themselves to be more genuine and real here. Because @Charles-Tim is still willing to remove the negative trust from his account if he can prove otherwise. So he actually got nothing to fear.

Anyway, Op you're welcome here. But only your genuine intentions and transparency can sustain you throughout your stay in the forum.

[Perfectbaby]

From what I am suspecting, he didn't just mark them Red but he was suspicious of the site.
Anyway, any trust given can be reversed provided they proved themselves otherwise.
Again, I do not think this site should be either be trusted because they own no operational license, meaning anyone using this site is at their own risk.
Have you also take a look at their withdrawal fee? 10% of their withdrawal, meaning if I had winning of 100$ they would deduct exactly 10$ from my winning amount.

I haven't tested the website, so I don't have an opinion on it yet.

This is the reason why before giving any gambling site credit we should at least test run their site before giving them.
Nevertheless, I understand your point yet, but it's advisable people to make their finding before using any gambling site or predictions market especially when they do not have operating license that covers them. Meaning, you can't just file any case against them, that is the reason why it's important to use a license site.

[TheAndy500]

The difference is that new projects used to be supported to build an ecosystem and community. Now, they're initially accused of scams. In my opinion, this is not how the trust system on Bitcointalk should work.

As for the website, as I wrote earlier, I have no opinion on it. Sorry for the off-topic.

[cashgammon]

We take a 10% fee on withdrawals. If you think this fee is too high, please let us know so we can review and adjust it.

Please keep in mind that this 10% withdrawal fee is the only revenue our platform generates.

Unlike other websites that manipulate game outcomes and prevent users from winning more than predetermined limits, we rely on verified results provided by trusted third-party APIs. Other casinos are often afraid to operate with this level of transparency.

As someone with over 15 years of experience working with reputable online casinos, and as an experienced software developer, I can assure you that the results on our website are entirely dependent on trusted, globally recognized service providers.

[Z_MBFM]

10% fee on every withdraw? That seems insanely high. I don't think you will find many players willing to lose 10% on every withdraw unless they get the 100% depo on every deposit and that's not sustainable. You might rethink the decision to have your wd fee so high.

Yes, Maximum Casino sites do not charge any fees for withdrawals. The sites I use have free withdrawals. Maximum platforms, among the biggest casino platforms in the market, allow players to withdraw any amount without any fees. A 10% fee means that if you withdraw $100, you will pay $100, while if you withdraw $1000, you will pay $100. This is very expensive. It seems unfair to deposit your own money, fulfill the 1x wagering condition, and then withdraw money with a 10% fee. If there are such conditions, it does not seem that gamblers will be encouraged to gamble on this platform.

[yahoo62278]

We take a 10% fee on withdrawals. If you think this fee is too high, please let us know so we can review and adjust it.

Please keep in mind that this 10% withdrawal fee is the only revenue our platform generates.

Unlike other websites that manipulate game outcomes and prevent users from winning more than predetermined limits, we rely on verified results provided by trusted third-party APIs. Other casinos are often afraid to operate with this level of transparency.

As someone with over 15 years of experience working with reputable online casinos, and as an experienced software developer, I can assure you that the results on our website are entirely dependent on trusted, globally recognized service providers.

Go look at your popular casinos and look at the house edge on their originals and the house edge on slots. You'll see that most of the casinos have a 1% house edge on their originals and on slots the house edge is usually 3-5%. There a little wiggle room in these numbers depending on the casino and provider, but for the most part these numbers are accurate. There is little to no fee to wd on most popular platforms. They generate their revenue mostly from their games. 10% is outrageous for any sort of fee, maybe 3% at most, but even with a lower fee to wd you still need to have a game that the public likes. If the product is no good, noone will play and this conversation is moot.

[cashgammon]

10% fee on every withdraw? That seems insanely high. I don't think you will find many players willing to lose 10% on every withdraw unless they get the 100% depo on every deposit and that's not sustainable. You might rethink the decision to have your wd fee so high.

Yes, Maximum Casino sites do not charge any fees for withdrawals. The sites I use have free withdrawals. Maximum platforms, among the biggest casino platforms in the market, allow players to withdraw any amount without any fees. A 10% fee means that if you withdraw $100, you will pay $100, while if you withdraw $1000, you will pay $100. This is very expensive. It seems unfair to deposit your own money, fulfill the 1x wagering condition, and then withdraw money with a 10% fee. If there are such conditions, it does not seem that gamblers will be encouraged to gamble on this platform.

OK, you right, If 10% is really too high, we'll lower it right away.