Exactly but it is not romanticized because the situation is real and AI is already being used and replaced human labor workforce.
And that's why I am believing more those people who are saying that people who don't know how to use AI will be replaced by those who know how to.
Like in the past ages, I think there's also this dilemma that they have experienced when the machines have been invented for manufacturing and made production faster. It's the same as what we're having although one sad reality is that, it's replacing a lot of workforce that can't adapt.
This is a sad reality for those workers who are struggling to adapt AI, but this could also be an advantage for the employers and company owners because they don't have to go through expensive manpower expenses because of limited workers now.
I don't think so, they also going through with the same costing problem. Replacing human laborforce is already showing up some costing problem.
They'll choose the human labor force soon when they've seen their expenses that's it's more expensive to use AI than real human service.
Furthermore, this creates a big challenge for fresh graduates entering the workforce as they have to face the highest risk and prove to their employers that they can learn well through AI and easily adapt those AI skills, otherwise they won't be given the opportunity to work and make good compensation.
It can also be a challenge and tip to them on what they should do.
The world job market is wide but, they really have to adapt how to use AI.