ROOM 1 – The Vanishing Transaction [Where Did the Payment Go?]WARNING: THIS IS A SIMULATED CASE. ALL LABELS, TIMESTAMPS, AND OBSERVATIONS BELOW ARE FICTIONAL. THEY DO NOT REFER TO A REAL BITCOIN TRANSACTION.
The IncidentAt 14:00, a user named Alex attempts to pay a supplier 0.015 BTC.
Alex's wallet reports that the transaction was sent. However, the supplier says the payment has not arrived.
Alex checks two blockchain explorers and becomes even more confused.
One explorer cannot find the transaction. Another reports that it is unconfirmed.
Alex contacts you, the investigator:
"My wallet says the payment was sent.
One explorer says it doesn't exist, another says it is unconfirmed, and the supplier still has no payment.
Has the Bitcoin network lost my transaction?"
Your mission is to determine what the available evidence proves, what remains uncertain, and what Alex should investigate next.
ExhibitsExhibit A - Wallet report
Simulated observation at 14:05
Wallet status - Pending
Amount displayed - 0.015 BTC
Confirmations displayed - 0
Transaction identifier - SIM-TX-ALPHA
Broadcast status - Wallet reports that the transaction was sent
The wallet's report is not an independently verified network record.
Exhibit B - Explorer Alpha
Simulated observation at 14:10
Search label - SIM-TX-ALPHA
Result - No record found
Confirmation status - Unknown
The explorer's search interface returns no record for the supplied case label.
Exhibit C - Explorer Beta
Simulated observation at 14:12
Search label - SIM-TX-ALPHA
Result - Unconfirmed
Confirmations displayed - 0
For this fictional exercise, Explorer Beta reports an unconfirmed transaction associated with the case label. The label is a teaching identifier, not a real Bitcoin transaction ID.
Exhibit D - Node operator's note
Simulated observation at 14:15
A node operator checks their own Bitcoin node and reports: "I cannot find this transaction in my node's current mempool."
The operator has not supplied a raw transaction, a valid transaction ID, a block inclusion proof, or evidence that the node saw the transaction earlier.
Your MissionAnswer all five questions.Question 1
What can you conclude?
Based on the four exhibits, what is the strongest conclusion you can reasonably reach?
Question 2
Has the payment been confirmed?
Can you establish that the supplier received a confirmed Bitcoin payment? Explain your reasoning.
Question 3
Why do the records disagree?
Give at least two technically plausible explanations for the inconsistent observations. Clearly distinguish possibilities from established facts.
Question 4
What evidence is missing?
Identify at least three additional pieces of evidence or checks that would help resolve the case.
Question 5
What should Alex do next?
Give a safe, practical investigation plan. Explain what Alex should verify before attempting another payment.
Rules- Please number your answers from 1 to 5.
- Explain your own understanding.
- Low-effort one-line answers will be ignored.
- Explain your reasoning in your own words. External references are welcome, but cite the specific documentation or source you rely on.
Important: Do not invent a real transaction ID, claim that the fictional payment occurred on the Bitcoin network, or treat an explorer's display as conclusive proof of payment.
The best investigators do not simply guess what happened. They explain what the evidence supports and what it does not.
Room 1 is now open. Good luck!