Clubchess.net | No KYC PvP Chess with Bitcoin Duels - Free Entry Tournament LIVE

[DiMarxist]

An interesting one for all chess lover's because, this is a combination of crypto and chess . The most interesting part of this is the free entry part were players can test their skill on a tournament, let see how this platform will grow going forward. This is a no KYC platform so I think for those who are not comfortable using platforms that enables KYC, this is a chance for such people. I think that this is chance for people to test their chess skills even before depositing money into the platform.

[aioc]

A rating is still an estimate, not a guarantee of equal skill. New accounts are especially uncertain: everyone starts at 1500, which doesn’t mean everyone plays at that level. The preview identifies opponents with no completed Duels as having a new rating.

That's the risk for new players because there are no build-up games for assessment of a player's rating, you could be up against a newly registered player with a higher ELO than yours.

I don't know about their assessment rating, if it's on a standard that is applied, like on the World Chess Body, FIDE uses a mathematical formula to rate their players, a win does not guarantee a high rating.

[Sarah Jordan]

Op you are welcome. You have introducing a new kind of casino here and I can see different suggestions and questions. And the idea I saw from one of the comments is good for your brand here which the poster said you should create an avenue for testing which is a good idea and I will also contribute on that suggestion that you shall create a kind of registration bonus for users to test the casino how it works. From the test if anyone wins good and want to withdraw, you can introduce a stipend deposit for the gambler to able to withdraw the funds.

And the entry amount of 0.2 mBTC is on the high rate and you have to review it. I don't think you will have much players.

Better Still if that is not possible op can launched a review campaign with he would pay people to review the site to know how trustworthy the site could be, and let the funds be escrowed with one the well known manager so that they would be that free to make the review without them thinking they will be played by the gambling site.
This alone will increase the exposure of their gambling as more people would have interest to review the site if they have a good paying rate to the applicants.

That's a fantastic idea. OP should look into this idea and show seriousness if they want players to use their site. Because when players sees good reviews it attracts them to use it. Not just good ones genuine reviews. Things like this builds trust for players to gamble on the site.

[robelneo]

How is cheating handled?

Engines, bots, outside assistance, shared accounts and arranged results are prohibited. Recorded moves and timing are screened, including comparisons with Stockfish, to identify concerns for human review. No check guarantees an unaided opponent. Unresolved checks can delay the related prize credit. Players can report games and appeal decisions under the Fair-Game Policy.

How reliable is your system in detecting cheating? Is it as good as what Lichess is employing? Since this is something new, I also recommend that you launch a review campaign to fully test the site. It's a promising platform in the gambling industry, provided that there's no manipulation or cheating that's going to happen.

Do not use chess engines, AI assistants, move-suggestion extensions, tablebases, opening references, or another person’s analysis while a competitive game is in progress.