How to avoid potential scams promoted in bitcointalk?

[bitbollo]

There is a "casino" that actually has used the same license for 5 "brands" that all ended in a bad scam and they have a dismal reputation online.

Now they are advertising here again.  I have already posted evidences but the "trusted/reputable" guys have just give 0 importance to avoid other users get scammed.
It's a scam/ it will end in a scam. Likewise a ponzi - no less no more.

Even now, they are even showing fake "high wins" and are (as all these scams) advertised in the same way https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5596254.msg67239922#msg67239922
Their domain seems to be expiry "very" soon. They are promoting "deposit bonus" and the same shit.

Ok, this confirm that some users don't make a minimum of due diligence once start to promote these websites - that are well known scammers at level of 1xbit.
Question to "trusted" users (!) that would avoid others get scammed:
-how it should be reported these issues - since I have already posted many times and these have been completely skipped?
-what is the "solution" to avoid these scams to be promoted and endorsed?

[Sanitough]

-what is the "solution" to avoid these scams to be promoted and endorsed?

I guess the best solution here is for the community to work together particularly the DT members. Personally, one of the things I look at when determining whether a casino is a scam is whether it has an active flag supported by DT members. Because when I see one I usually avoid promoting that casino especially when it comes to joining signature campaigns. after all, promoting a casino with a valid scam flag feels like putting the community in danger and the risk of getting tagged as well.

[examplens]

Their domain seems to be expiry "very" soon. They are promoting "deposit bonus" and the same shit.

Domain renewal costs $10 to $45 (for .io extension). This is really not serious evidence for organized fraud

Question to "trusted" users (!) that would avoid others get scammed:
-how it should be reported these issues - since I have already posted many times and these have been completely skipped?
-what is the "solution" to avoid these scams to be promoted and endorsed?

Arguments that resemble a previously known scam, or any kind of assumption, are not sufficient. Even if such assumptions are very good, it is enough that one of the 10 marked casinos is not a scam and the whole method falls.
I guess it's best to open the discussion by presenting all the risk attributes and evidence, then let the community continue to contribute. Bad actors often do not have much patience for a civilized discussion in such cases, and things quickly come to light.

[bitbollo]

Domain renewal costs $10 to $45 (for .io extension). This is really not serious evidence for organized fraud

Sure, considering they are paying "millions of dollars" it looks questionable the reason they are not investing such huge sum.

not sufficient.

Would you deposit money in a exchange that has failed/scammed 5 times and show you fake transactions/volume too with their 6th "brand"?

The same license is actually linked to 5 casino scams.
Now has just launched another the 6th scam casino. To make a comparison, a well known scammer, after making 5 exactly robbery in the same way, has just launched the 6 - exact same kind of scam.
We can't call this a scammer yet because he has make only 5 scams or there is like an indefinite time the same license would provide a casino scam?

Moreover, the fact that they show fake traffic/including fake wins (aka fake money in their reserve) isn't a proof of wrong doing?

[AHOYBRAUSE]

I feel first of all ALL campaign managers should be more selective when taking on new customers and start a signature campaign for them. You shouldn't just accept everybody for a couple of $, at least check their background to not skip through some red flags that can easily be spotted. I know it's always nice to have a portfolio as big as possible and earn money with it, yet promoting questionable sites over and over again is obviously not the way to go.
Recently we have seen a high influx on new casino campaigns, and we have also seen several new scam accusation thread for some of them, which is obviously alarming.
Some things can be avoided so easy when a certain due diligence has been done.

[bitbollo]

I feel first of all ALL campaign managers should be more selective when taking on new customers and start a signature campaign for them. You shouldn't just accept everybody for a couple of $, at least check their background to not skip through some red flags that can easily be spotted. I know it's always nice to have a portfolio as big as possible and earn money with it, yet promoting questionable sites over and over again is obviously not the way to go.
Recently we have seen a high influx on new casino campaigns, and we have also seen several new scam accusation thread for some of them, which is obviously alarming.
Some things can be avoided so easy when a certain due diligence has been done.

In 13 years on this forum I've never seen such huge amount of "identical" scams.
These restrictions we seen with mixers at international level would be pushed also to gambling sites - censoring a way to use / talk about bitcoin.
Even worst, only some fraudolent/selective scams would survive in a similar scenario.

Imagine we was starting to use bitcoin and trying to get a juicy bonus and losing all these coins.
Would you use bitcoin? Would you read bitcointalk? No absolutely no.

Ok scams "are not moderated" but in the past we have seen actions to avoid these situations. Where is the community? What has changed in the last month if they are providing the same scam?  
It's paradoxical that every thread in scam accusations has practically the same group of users involved!  Using the same tactics, trying to "shut down" the accusations, defame people, or just finding an excuse not to pay them!

One of these, jokes that I'm a pharmacist or maybe I was who knows.
It's clear that these are the details that should tell them "we're not the same thing". Translate in my language and you will get.
They're probably hoping to steal enough before they can stop in time and avoid being caught by some police force.

[Perfectbaby]

Ok, this confirm that some users don't make a minimum of due diligence once start to promote these websites - that are well known scammers at level of 1xbit.
Question to "trusted" users (!) that would avoid others get scammed:
-how it should be reported these issues - since I have already posted many times and these have been completely skipped?
-what is the "solution" to avoid these scams to be promoted and endorsed?

The trust system is actually there which I know that people who understand the trust system will never be tempted to go use their platform anymore, irrespective of any bonus that are being offered by them.
But about visitors or new users who doesn't know how the system works may completely ignore the trust and go into using the site due to higher sign up and deposit bonus that are being offered to them. Of course, I can as well flashed back to 1xbit and they didn't find their way here and even though they trust to increase their pay rate, everyone who promoted them receive the Negative feed back from well trusted users. I believe same Thing could be done to the above sites that you mentioned.

[Yablee0]

I feel first of all ALL campaign managers should be more selective when taking on new customers and start a signature campaign for them. You shouldn't just accept everybody for a couple of $, at least check their background to not skip through some red flags that can easily be spotted. I know it's always nice to have a portfolio as big as possible and earn money with it, yet promoting questionable sites over and over again is obviously not the way to go.
Recently we have seen a high influx on new casino campaigns, and we have also seen several new scam accusation thread for some of them, which is obviously alarming.
Some things can be avoided so easy when a certain due diligence has been done.

Yeah, it makes more sense that way. It's more saved if campaign managers do a little underground findings  about a particular casinos before accepting their offer. However, I can understand the level of stress and hard time many managers undergo before securing a campaign, its not that easy no doubt and I applaud their efforts in that regard because it's not that easy.

Again, I know that their are some managers that are here in the forum that knows their job perfectly well and I believe most of all these things you just mentioned are what they pay more attention to before accepting any campaign. Managers like Hhampuz, GodOfThunder , CryptopreneurBrainboss etc. Perhaps, if things can continue this way, probably other follow suit, everything will be okay and all this cases of scam from casinos wouldn't be on a higher rate.