Didn't the US Supreme Court rule that US Presidents have "immunity"? So Trump would be exempt from prosecution. Especially when the deal you've mentioned was made during his term as President. His family, however, would be at risk. But with Donald Trump in power, we can expect anything. He could pardon his family members if they get convicted. Or the lawsuit could be dismissed by "playing dirty tricks".
WLFI, might fade away into oblivion as the Trump family cashes out and move on to the next big thing. Same goes for Trump's "meme" coin. I'd be surprised if WLFI lasts way beyond Trump's presidency.
I wouldn't even use your money to speculate in WLFI, lol. As far as "immunity", I thought that applied to acts when performing presidential duties. I'm not sure how this would be part of his presidential duties. However, I'm sure he'll try to use executive privilege and if that doesn't work, he'll go to his tried and true method- tie things up in the court system so they can drag out for years.
Yep, I think that's true, as far as I understand, there is no immunity for private acts, and the WLFI business I think fall under category of private acts which means no immunity, and since federal prosecutors is under department of justice which is under the President control, it's very unlikely that Trump get prosecuted.
Even if Democratic midterm sweep were to happen, it's still very unlikely. Until he left the post, he probably wont be prosecuted.