"Overcharging" the rich to offer subsidy to the poor and needy, How moral?

[Maslate]

I have no issue when businesses help the poor. Perhaps most of us have this sense of responsibility to the disadvantaged. I also have no issue when expensive businesses are listing their goods and services at exorbitant prices simply because their niche is the ultra-rich. I don't care if they're fooling each other.

But I think I'd take offense when the same thing is offered at different prices to customers depending on their economic status. That doesn't seem fair. Just put a uniform price tag on your product or service for everybody and sell it regardless of their standing.

Or much better, separate the items, this lane is for rich buyers, while the other lane intended for the unfortunate ones. That way, rich buyers will no longer be confused that you are offering higher prices for them with the same, exact item.

And for your business not to be abused, ask for ID's for those really poor ones, because there is high chances that even the rich, unknown people will also hide their real identity and pretend to be poor so they can avail the lesser prices on your store.

[Nasdel4]

Being rich or poor are personal choices most times and I think this is all about personal ideology. I think prices should affect everyone equally despite their financial status. I think there are levels to everything including quality of materials used in production.
When you buy quality you don't expect it to be cheap and if you can't afford it I'm sure there are other products that serve similar purposes so instead of feeling bad they should think of alternatives.
If the cost of producing a quality product is not considered, the producer ends up losing. If the cost is considered then it affects the price which affects the people buying the end product. Everything wasn't made for everyone which is why you need to be intentional when doing anything because like I said there are levels to everything.

[Darker45]

~snip~

Or much better, separate the items, this lane is for rich buyers, while the other lane intended for the unfortunate ones. That way, rich buyers will no longer be confused that you are offering higher prices for them with the same, exact item.

I don't find this acceptable. On the contrary, this is actually revolting.

I don't think something like this will work, at least as far as my country's context is concerned. Imagine working hard, and living a better life as a result, but you're barred from picking items from a specific lane in a grocery store simply because you're supposed to get them at a higher price from a different lane. That seems insulting. Am I being punished for succeeding in life?

I think Fortify is correct. Let there be different brands and prices, and let customers buy what they can afford.

[Agbamoni]

I'm considering this topic because of the poor and needy. When we propose ideas that can help keep businesses profitable, we are burdened by the fact that they are probably going to be at the detriment of the poor and needy. So, for conscience sake, we focus on workable ideas that support the poor without affecting businesses negatively.

The idea does not make sense at all. Most rich people you see today work their ass off day and night to get to that level. They will feel cheated when they are buying the same quality as the poor at a higher price, while the poor get it at a lower price. The reason why different quality of the same product exists is because of class.

The poor can afford the cheaper and lower-quality products, while the rich buy the expensive ones. Same product but different quality. This will put the rich and the poor in their places.

[Yeesha]

If I discover that you are charging me high for patronizing you, because you want to sell low to people you consider poor I will stop patronizing you. If I decide to dress well doesn’t mean that I should be over charged for what I’m buying. If you want to run a charity home for the poor in your business, make it known to people so that any one who want to donate to that course will support willing. I didn’t steal the money you think I have. I worked hard for it. The government are holding the resources of the people. Such idea will crumble your business. I don’t think I can ever do that if I’m a business owner.

Not just you, I believe everybody will do the same, including me, because that's not equity. The mode of dressing can sometimes change individual's reality but it can never change their background and personality. Some poors also dress nicely, in fact, some wealthy people are even more humble than the poors. Without doing injustice, some businesses are still favourable to the poors, because when it comes to purchasing something or a commodity, poor people usually bargain, unlike some rich people they will just give you the exact same amount that is tag on the products without bargaining. OP don't have to stress himself about that, because they are shops that are made purposely for the riches and poor. So as an individual, you understand your financial status/ situation, so you will just go directly to where is favourable, and suitable for you.

[MorganaX]

I have read alot of post and I still don't understand why we support and moralize business that steals from the rich, we talk like they overcharge the rich to provide for the poor whilst they sell the actual market price which already contains a sizable gain and they collect more from the rich through appearances to make more, it's not moral if this accept from the both economic parties.

[abhiseshakana]

The idea does not make sense at all. Most rich people you see today work their ass off day and night to get to that level. They will feel cheated when they are buying the same quality as the poor at a higher price, while the poor get it at a lower price. The reason why different quality of the same product exists is because of class.

The poor can afford the cheaper and lower-quality products, while the rich buy the expensive ones. Same product but different quality. This will put the rich and the poor in their places.

In my country there is a concept of Warung Serba 3000 (Rupiah 3000/ 17 cent food stalls) the concept is by paying 17 cents, anyone is free to eat as much as they like until they’re full. I think this in line with your idea of supporting the poor without damaging the business ecosystem. Practically, they selling one serving of complete and nutritious food at a price far below capital. Rich or poor people are treated the same but affluent customers, donors, or corporate sponsors pay the standard price or even a higher amount or purchase donation vouchers . The profit  the owner get from these more fortunate individuals directly covers the cost deficit for the meals provided to the needy.

But these businesses have managed to survive thanks to mutual cooperation and support from the community. In this modern world , the concept of profit has undergone a shift in meaning and it is no longer merely material gain , but rather encompasses social capital and the sustainability of the community.

[Rabata]

I have read alot of post and I still don't understand why we support and moralize business that steals from the rich, we talk like they overcharge the rich to provide for the poor whilst they sell the actual market price which already contains a sizable gain and they collect more from the rich through appearances to make more, it's not moral if this accept from the both economic parties.

It is very important for a businessman to maintain honesty and fairness at all times, because no matter what the situation is, he should maintain honesty in conducting business. It is natural to make profit in business, but it is not fair to raise the price irrationally just because the buyer's financial condition, that is, the person is rich.

It is not right to charge more money from a rich person just because he spends more money. Again, even if the intention is to benefit the poor, one should not charge more than others regarding the fact. Determining a fair price by considering the quality, cost and market conditions of the product is the best thing for a businessman. This not only benefits the business, but also maintains the trust of the buyers. Therefore, it is more important for businessmen to continue their business properly without looking at the rich and the poor.