Too Cautious?

[PrivacyG]

The closest thing to what she says would be a large building with significant amount of hardware inside that is legally registered as a 'Bitcoin Mining Farm' but there is no real Bitcoin Mining equipment inside as it is only disguised as one and is instead full of servers and equipment to spy on military.

I can not even imagine how an actual Mining Farm can be turned in to a spying machine.

[Stalker22]

~
What's on your mind? Complete hatred still, too cautious or dumb?

There are many things Elizabeth Warren has stated against Bitcoin.  Many of them are untrue.

As I understand it, she doesnt get the technology at all.  I dont think its pure hatred - just deep political paranoia paired with zero understanding of basic computer networks.

[Curious T]

What's on your mind? Complete hatred still, too cautious or dumb?

I think I will go for the third option, "dump".

On the contrary, I don't think they are dumb. The kow exactly what they are doing. People who have gotten to that level in society may not be dumb. They may just be ignorant about a particular and when you have opinions about something you don't understand, it's normal to have funny opinions. Another reason for the stupid opinion is when you are supporting a stupid idea. There is no way you will defend a stupid idea without looking or sounding stupid. This is why you would see "intelligent" people sounding stupid.

[HajiBagi]

In the world of Elizabeth Warren I don't think she hates Bitcoin like many people thinks but at the same time she has proven to be too cautious all the time, she sees treat in every movements 😜

I want to talk about this part though, is it possible for terrorists to come into the US and build Bitcoin mining farm on the US soil and start to send information back to another country?  I am not a US citizen but I know that if this is possible many would have been caught, there was a time around 2024 - 2025 where someone said something this similar too, but no Bitcoin mining farm as been exposed as a terrorist haven for sending info.

I am really thankful that Satoshi doesn't create Bitcoin to be a capable of sending any decentralised messages around the Blockchain like some alternative coins can, man they would have called Bitcoin a messaging tool for terrorists organisations and it will surely look like it with nothing to wash it off, I think Elizabeth Warren needs a lot of lecturing about Bitcoin and it's Blockchain.



What's on your mind? Complete hatred still, too cautious or dumb?

Maybe she don't understand Bitcoin that is why she made that statement, but if she know about bitcoin and she said those her words just bec she hate bitcoin that means she has fail, because no matter what she said about bitcoin she can not change the fact is the best investment in the world and can not be control by anybody or government, when i saw something like tgjs, i have already know that it will be from those who think they have the power and they didn't have the power to control bitcoin.

They know what they are doing, they don't have any way to stop bitcoin they see it growing every day and people are interested in it, that is why they are panicking, all these things they are saying about bitcoin shows that if bitcoin is being control by group of people, i don't think it will reach to the level it is right now.

[drangos]

The difference between a theoretical risk and actual wrongdoing. I think. Limited data can be stored on the Bitcoin public ledger using a variety of techniques, including OP_RETURN. But those techniques leave the data open to all parties who review the blockchain; they are not suitable for secret communication. Where foreign ownership of mining is at issue near sensitive infrastructure, the emphasis should not be on mining per se, but on ownership, access and on credible evidence of surveillance. As with any business, security considerations must be addressed. But it is important that the same rigor be used no matter what type of data center the business is.

[boyptc]

I thought that she just said this recently due to what happened in Paris. But as per my research, she has said this months ago so there's no connection to that.

And with the companies trying to spy on another one is common, they're doing it in various ways and one of it through business. They send information and they work as their main land's intelligence.

It's possible for the mining farms especially if they are owned by a foreigner in the US soil or there are partners who are suspicious which are not a citizen of the country.

I thought I read something like this in 2025, that's last year, I could be wrong but I doubt, still months back so you are still right, why can't they just stop foreigners from running mining farms in the US then? It will be a case closed but I guess this will need some vote too?

I am not going to take a side and I like the fact that one party is saying no and the other is saying yes, this will reveal a lot than we already know so it's helpful that Warren is going gaga crazy on Bitcoin mining on the US soil by foreigners.

What I've read was from March, those were the articles that came out from the results. But maybe she's been saying that since last year or even before and had been consistent with it.

I cannot wholly say why they can't stop it since I am not from the location. There can be some loopholes in the system and that's why they can't just stop it easily.

If it's allowed by the law, they can take over those if they kick them out. Otherwise, it's only about the security that Warren is concerned about.

[Majestic-milf]

What's on your mind? Complete hatred still, too cautious or dumb?

Terrorists can use any business as a cover-up to carry out their goals. Some companies outsource their IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, and cloud management to third parties from other countries. Data centers, hosting services, software development, and electronic manufacturing are all means of stealing data. What about the government and big companies employing undercover terrorists?

Elizabeth Warren is not ignorant. Maybe people whose names include Warren always have something against Bitcoin  .

Some people masquerade their hatred for something under the guise of concern and Elizabeth has always been against Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general so why should what she's saying now seem surprising? So because Bitcoin has been regarded as a means for criminals to launder funds is what is fueling her opinions? She's just a hater and the thing about haters is that they'd keep hating on Bitcoin but that won't stop it's growth.