[ANN] Safety.Casino — Five-Source Casino Rating Comparison

[fighter2627]

I looked at the platform and thought that other gamblers could use it as a basis for choosing online casinos in the crypto space due to of the feedback they can read using this platform.

But of course, not all the feedback or reviews that we read are 100% true dude to sometimes there are paid reviews that happen like this and we don't know which of them are really paid,
so it's still up to us how to handle it.

[acroman08]

Welcome to the forum!

Great site, btw! Gamblers looking for casinos to try could use this as a way to see the ratings of the casinos they are considering gambling at from different platforms/communities.

Just curious, are you planning on ever adding new sources? I mean, Casinomeister is also a great site to look for a casino rating, but most of the casinos that they have rated(as far as I know) are fiat casinos.

[Qieraa]

a five-source rating comparison sounds useful, but i’d look closely at how they score payout reliability, licensing, and withdrawal complaints. independent sources matter more than a single overall rating.

[Safety.casino]

Low-Rated Casino Spotlight

Today’s spotlight is LollyBet Casino, with an overall Safety.Casino score of 3.3/10 from three counted sources.

Casino Guru rates it 2.7, AskGamblers 7.2, while an active Trustpilot Consumer Warning contributes 0 under our methodology.

The wide difference shows why checking every original source matters.

View the full rating comparison

Not a safety guarantee. 18+

[Mutuvasilin]

I personally think that finding out the best casino by own exploring is the best and safest, but when we explore ourselves, we still need some sources from where we can analyze or verify about a casino.
From this point of view, even casino review sites often show fake reviews, but we still depend on them partially to know the reviews of a casino.
And that is why I also take a look on the Casino Guru, Trustpilot, AskGamblers, and if I talk about Safety.Casino, their listing shows the average score of the top five review sites including these three, which I found interesting.
Still, I wouldn't say that you should blindly trust them and their reviews, however, even if we explore ourselves, we can still use this site as a tool. 

As for fake reviews inflating ratings I don't think we can escape that these days and a lot of places work that way. What matters more is the quality of those reviews. Three free words from an AI agent is one thing and a meaningful text from a real person who got paid is another. If a casino can afford good quality marketing there may be fewer questions about it since one-day scam sites usually don't have that kind of budget.

p.s. not saying I approve of this method though just sharing a thought

[notblox1]

This is a good idea to combine five different sources to get more precise score for each casino, but you should also include rating from bitcointalk forum.
I dont trust reviews coming from trustpilot website, and I see they have very low ratings for some great casinos I use for years.
People should also have the option to write additional reviews on website for each casino they use.

[Safety.casino]

Top-Rated Casino Spotlight

Today's spotlight is BitStarZ, currently the highest overall score on Safety.Casino: 9.2/10 with all five sources counted.

Casino Guru 9.8, AskGamblers 10.0, Casino.org 10.0 and Trustpilot 8.6, while LCB sits lower at 7.4.

BitStarZ rating comparison

Ratings are opinions, not a safety guarantee. 18+

[Haunebu]

Today's spotlight is BitStarZ, currently the highest overall score on Safety.Casino: 9.2/10 with all five sources counted.

Casino Guru 9.8, AskGamblers 10.0, Casino.org 10.0 and Trustpilot 8.6, while LCB sits lower at 7.4.

BitStarZ rating comparison

Ratings are opinions, not a safety guarantee. 18+[/center]

This is exactly why Bitcointalk gambling site reviews matter just as much or even more than CG, AG etc reviews. Bitstarz is a proven scam site within this forum thanks to their representative bailing due to their reputation going down the drain here. Ratings aren't everything.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1723619.0

I guess it would be difficult to include Bitcointalk reviews in this rating comparison since there isn't a proper rating system here.

[m0nica.just]

~

I guess it would be difficult to include Bitcointalk reviews in this rating comparison since there isn't a proper rating system here.

At least there are topics with announcements and scam accusations and for analysts it shouldn't be a mission impossible to collect them from time to time.

[panjul07]

I guess it would be difficult to include Bitcointalk reviews in this rating comparison since there isn't a proper rating system here.

Agree, although we have trust rating system in this forum but it is different to the rating on review sites.
What we can see in this forum is about whether a casino is reliable enough but there is no exact score as a rating.
It is possible to create a poll where the forum members give the rating but I dont think it will represent the actual rating because once a poll is create, most members will vote a casino because of they are participating in the campaign.

[Agbe]

I looked at the platform and thought that other gamblers could use it as a basis for choosing online casinos in the crypto space due to of the feedback they can read using this platform.

But of course, not all the feedback or reviews that we read are 100% true dude to sometimes there are paid reviews that happen like this and we don't know which of them are really paid,
so it's still up to us how to handle it.

That's is why it is good to know them from this forum. Even the reviews from this forum, the paid or unpaid they still give their original points of views. Though those people who reviews casinos in the forum will not like to speak bad about the casino but if they see something that is wrong they will definitely speak out. But other review website are not like that. They praise the casino when they didn't even use the casino.

When can someone give a good review when they didn't use the services? No way. And that is how they do in most of those reviews.