I can see you are more up to the task by giving the prompt update required concerning the casino and following up with the discussion ongoing on this thread, I will also advise you to ensure that you avoid making repeated post on a row, it is always advisable that you allow someone to reply after your previous post or you edit the last one you made and merge them together with the new one you are posting if there is no reply yet after you last post.
I can see you are more up to the task by giving the prompt update required concerning the casino and following up with the discussion ongoing on this thread, I will also advise you to ensure that you avoid making repeated post on a row, it is always advisable that you allow someone to reply after your previous post or you edit the last one you made and merge them together with the new one you are posting if there is no reply yet after you last post.
Being active here is actually good but what op should know is that there are people who doesn't like using third party site to express how trusted and reliable a gambling site should be. For instance; there are people who on their own passes judgement based on their experience with whatever site that they are dealing with than someone out there or a site gives out their judgement, most times such ratings can be compromised or a bought rating from people.
Of course, you are right when posting op should be able to quote multiple posts than back to back.
Thank you both for the feedback, it's appreciated.
On third-party ratings: you're right that no single rating site should be taken at face value, and players' own experience matters. That's why Safety.Casino doesn't publish a rating of its own. We show five independent sources side by side, link each one to its original page and keep the source scores visible, so readers can see where the sources agree, where they don't, and check them directly. The scores are for reference only, not a safety guarantee — we always encourage players to read the original reviews and do their own research.
Thanks again for taking the time to share your thoughts.
