Sort and filter feature

[Xiestar]

I think this suggestion while I’m searching for a thread to conduct some research. It’s hard to find a suitable service that I can easily trust assuming that I’m not familiar in specific board services. For example’s gambling board, I usually want a stable casino based on their years of operation and the casino reputation if I’m searching for a trusted casino.

There’s a massive list of casinos out there while it’s tiring to view the thread one by one.

This sort and filter can make user see only the casino that has low risk most importantly if they don’t have full knowledge on that board.

This is how I envisioned it using AI generator.

[oll]

I think this suggestion while I’m searching for a thread to conduct some research. It’s hard to find a suitable service that I can easily trust assuming that I’m not familiar in specific board services. For example’s gambling board, I usually want a stable casino based on their years of operation and the casino reputation if I’m searching for a trusted casino.

There’s a massive list of casinos out there while it’s tiring to view the thread one by one.

This sort and filter can make user see only the casino that has low risk most importantly if they don’t have full knowledge on that board.

You’ve been here since 2016, and you still haven’t realized that the forum prefers to stay in its conservative form? Believe me, your idea won’t be implemented, and why would it? How will a new user find out whose opinions the Trust is based on? Since you’re good at using AI, you can simply ask it to compile such a rating specifically for you. You can even ask the AI to list only those casinos that are represented on the forum.
You can read the threads and guidelines for your casino list and offer constructive feedback. But I reiterate that such Trust Lists will not be implemented natively. Apparently, people are clamoring for new features, so they are being enabled through third-party services.

[Emjay24]

This sort and filter can make user see only the casino that has low risk most importantly if they don’t have full knowledge on that board.

The list you're requesting needs the services to be actively tested and recommended by the admin and I doubt he's willing to do that kind of job. The forum doesn't directly endorse any platform, they allow platforms to market permitted services and it's up to you to do your research and pick the right choice for yourself.  Some members did some good job putting some list down with respect to their own findings and members contributions, I'll leave the link to some which is still being updated.

• Best Bitcoin Casinos - A list made by members
• Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos

You can still use bitlist.co to see services that you want to use. In terms of review, you still have Trustpilot

[noorman0]

How is the rating obtained? The trust score on a profile doesn't always imply experience with the service, sometimes it relates to other businesses.

Who will be the official arbiter if someone comes to the forum asking for justice?
I think this is irrelevant to the purpose of the forum, Bitcointalk is not a ratings site. I don't agree that admins should be directly involved in labeling a service that ultimately gives false positives.

[un_rank]

The forum has an existing system with trust feedback, flags, the scam accusation board and replies from users. You can combine all of this and form your opinion of any casino you're interested in.

Your suggestion does not apply to other boards. It will be trying to create a casino rating tracker on the forum, those are already available for you to compare and then use forum feedback to make a decision.

- Jay -

[AVE5]

I think this suggestion while I’m searching for a thread to conduct some research. It’s hard to find a suitable service that I can easily trust assuming that I’m not familiar in specific board services. For example’s gambling board, I usually want a stable casino based on their years of operation and the casino reputation if I’m searching for a trusted casino.

There’s a massive list of casinos out there while it’s tiring to view the thread one by one.

This sort and filter can make user see only the casino that has low risk most importantly if they don’t have full knowledge on that board.

Maybe I've been lagging, I haven't been aware that there's is specific thread with the contents of recommending reputable casino's. Casino's can only be rated based on their services with you.
You don't either expect the forum to recommend one for you. If members of the forum or off forum third party recommends one for you, it's advised that you should further your research and having to test the casino before you can reliably adapt to it.
In essence, even the Ai recommendations can't be trusted and you must be careful of how you uses the Ai for recommendations because, it can generate outcomes randomly.
You'll always be at your own RISK on the quest of searching for reputable casino's which is why one source of verifying informations may not be enough.
So on that fact of rating casino's, don't rely on the Ai and don't also trust forum members opinions alone too.

[KingsDen]

From the image you shared, there are 3 important parameters which are; Trust score, date created (oldest and newest). Using these parameters, you can create your own thread about the reputation of casinos. But this time, you have to take into account, how many accusations against a casino and how many they were able to resolve. With these varying parameters, you might not have a reliable data still.

The casino reputation is considered by how long a casino has honestly conducted business in the forum. There are some threads with these informations, so don't bother to create another and don't expect the forum admin to do that, he has more pressing things to do in life other than sorting casinos.

[mikel_012]

The forum has an existing system with trust feedback, flags, the scam accusation board and replies from users. You can combine all of this and form your opinion of any casino you're interested in.

Your suggestion does not apply to other boards. It will be trying to create a casino rating tracker on the forum, those are already available for you to compare and then use forum feedback to make a decision.

- Jay -

I agree

This would be too much work for something that is not the focus of the forum. Casinos can exist and they do a lot of work for the forum economy with the events and signature campaigns, but this is not a gambling forum

I think the community can make a script or page to organize this better, instead of asking for the forum admin to work on such feature

[Xiestar]

I think this suggestion while I’m searching for a thread to conduct some research. It’s hard to find a suitable service that I can easily trust assuming that I’m not familiar in specific board services. For example’s gambling board, I usually want a stable casino based on their years of operation and the casino reputation if I’m searching for a trusted casino.

There’s a massive list of casinos out there while it’s tiring to view the thread one by one.

This sort and filter can make user see only the casino that has low risk most importantly if they don’t have full knowledge on that board.

You’ve been here since 2016, and you still haven’t realized that the forum prefers to stay in its conservative form? Believe me, your idea won’t be implemented, and why would it? How will a new user find out whose opinions the Trust is based on? Since you’re good at using AI, you can simply ask it to compile such a rating specifically for you. You can even ask the AI to list only those casinos that are represented on the forum.

What conservative you are referring? This feature is a simple
filter when choosing a thread to read and do research.


Honestly, I don’t understand most replies above. This feature is a filter to sort threads based on user preference. It’s not a guide to choose what’s a trusted casino because the forum doesn’t moderate scams.

It’s just a normal instinct that users that have less experience will consider the service age and trust score. So with your logic that trust score shouldn’t be used then it means that the current DT system failed.