My response will be that an exchange with no reserves does not deserve to be called one; anything can happen at any time. And the truth is that what is happening to these exchanges has been happening to a lot of traditional banking for years, but overlooked, because there are expectations for digital banking; that is why they are feeling the heat.
I think it's not mentioned about these exchanges having that insurance for these incidents, and that's one source where they can pull funds for situations that they are facing right now.
I get your point, and like I said, I don't support keeping funds on CEXs. All I'm saying is we shouldn't lump every exchange together and jump to the conclusion that users will lose their money if something goes wrong. Each exchange has its own financial strength, risk management system, and way of handling a crisis. People losing money to Mt.Gox and FTX doesn't mean users of Bybit, Bitget and Binance will end up the same way.
No one can guarantee that customers will always get compensated in every situation , but that doesn't mean every incident ends with users losing money either . What Bitget and Bybit did is proof of that , and Binance is doing a great job now too.
https://x.com/binance/status/2116871932075516174I reckon of how they have handled properly all of these situations that these known exchanges been through.
While we appreciate that they have enough funds to cover every user for the hack, it's true that they have good financial backup for these incidents.
And I agree that if someone decides to keep funds still in these exchanges, it shouldn't be a lot but much better if they are always in alert and aware of these potential attacks.