👑 Chasing.Bet | Sweepstake Casino | 20+ Originals | 50% First Deposit Bonus

[traderethereum]

Welcome to Bitcointalk. I visited the site and registered. Those who waiting for the email confirmation, you need to check on your Spam folder because the email confirmation could be on that folder.

Claimed the free spin from Chasing.bet and play slot game from Pragmatic Play. I've got 25 spins to play Sweet Bonanza but no luck for me. But I checked to the Withdrawal section and see "Withdrawals are locked — wager $48.60 more to clear your wagering requirement." Maybe we need to deposit, play more and wagering to release the amount.

They offer 5k GC which you can use to play slot. But I don't know we can withdraw the coin or not.

[Shishir99]

If you think our terms are wrong, feel free to open your own casino and run promotions however you like. I'd genuinely love to see how you'd handle the same abuse. Until then, our rules stand.

And on the "any multiplier is fair and square" point — sure, with your own money. But with bonus funds, what are you actually risking? That's the whole reason the terms exist.

Honestly, you either don't understand our position or don't want to. Maybe you're one of the ones banned for this. Either way, I'll stop arguing here — we just don't see it the same way. Peace, my friend.

I understand your point of view. But it is hard to convince people with such an attitude. Allow me to explain how other casinos handle such cases.

Popular casinos like Betfury do not count 100% of the wager as a qualified wager for the bonuses. Let's say someone has to wager $2000 to clear the requirements, and they are going to play Limbo or Dice with low risk, which is actually easy for the players. So, what the casino does is, they count 10% of the wager in original games as a qualified wager. If I place a $10 bet on Dice, the casino counts $1 as a qualified wager, because it was placed in a low-risk game.

The same thing applies to table games as well. You need to come up with a better solution instead of arguing with the players. You should check how your competitors handle such cases.

Good luck!

[keyscore44]

If you think our terms are wrong, feel free to open your own casino and run promotions however you like. I'd genuinely love to see how you'd handle the same abuse. Until then, our rules stand.

And on the "any multiplier is fair and square" point — sure, with your own money. But with bonus funds, what are you actually risking? That's the whole reason the terms exist.

Honestly, you either don't understand our position or don't want to. Maybe you're one of the ones banned for this. Either way, I'll stop arguing here — we just don't see it the same way. Peace, my friend.

I understand your point of view. But it is hard to convince people with such an attitude. Allow me to explain how other casinos handle such cases.

Popular casinos like Betfury do not count 100% of the wager as a qualified wager for the bonuses. Let's say someone has to wager $2000 to clear the requirements, and they are going to play Limbo or Dice with low risk, which is actually easy for the players. So, what the casino does is, they count 10% of the wager in original games as a qualified wager. If I place a $10 bet on Dice, the casino counts $1 as a qualified wager, because it was placed in a low-risk game.

The same thing applies to table games as well. You need to come up with a better solution instead of arguing with the players. You should check how your competitors handle such cases.

Good luck!

That’s correct. To avoid any misunderstandings, some casinos exclude "originals" games entirely - that keeps things clear. In such cases, a 35x wagering requirement is acceptable.

But sure, it’s your house, your rules. If someone doesn’t like it, there are plenty of other casinos they can choose from.

[Agbe]

I was navigating around the internet to see if there are any reviews on the site and in Trustpilot I didn't see chase.bet but there is a related casino review which is https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.chasebet.com.au. op do have an idea on this www.chasebet.com.au casino? Though the casino reputation there is not bad. Op I checked your website and moved around it and the creation of the site is not bad. You can contact a manager for any possible promotions in the forum. Welcome.

[chasing.bet]

Your casino has a complaint by the X community that has not been resolved, they said that complained, your casino took deposits, winnings and suspended his account, then how does this happen?

In your casino under it join communities like X and Discord the link doesn't work, so what's the use of it?
I think you should clarify first before doing a promotion here, I'm sure other users will not be happy if there are cases that have not been resolved.

The case in X. - https://x.com/chimneeofficial/status/2110897945948393638

Already as we know if there is any site that is having issues or that is being accused on other websites then they should be doing their best to make sure they clear up the accusations.
Launching here without them having to do the needful would never help them in any means, and to me is already a red flag because no one would want to go use such a gambling site that has never been established here and yet having a lot of trust issues.
Between, I didn't see them mentioned about anything that relates with their kyc, or if they are VPN enabled casino.

Whenever a casino tightens its rules to prevent losses, that actually shows the games are fair and winners do get paid. If we had something to hide, we wouldn't bother fixing anything — we'd just let you win as much as you want and then ban you. Simple as that. So everything you've said just shows how hard it is for a platform to run a legitimate business and still get this kind of bias thrown at it.

[salad daging]

They used the bonus funds to place extremely low-risk wagers — for example, Limbo at a 1.01x multiplier — which is a well-known technique to meet wagering requirements with minimal risk while preserving the bonus balance.

Supposedly, you exclude the original game with a low multiplier, consider it for the criteria for wagering requirements such as in slot games and I also do not know how the terms and conditions of this bonus, is the Limbo game included in it?

This is not an isolated incident. We have encountered this pattern of bonus abuse repeatedly — both in the past and continuing today — and it is precisely because of this history that we cannot simply return funds whenever a complaint is made. Doing so would only invite the same abuse again and again.

Your site casino is just over a month old, so I'm not sure you're talking about which past? Has there been a lot of abuse in the past month? I also doubt many of the players who came in.

Your Domain starts from: 2026-09-28

[chasing.bet]

If you think our terms are wrong, feel free to open your own casino and run promotions however you like. I'd genuinely love to see how you'd handle the same abuse. Until then, our rules stand.

And on the "any multiplier is fair and square" point — sure, with your own money. But with bonus funds, what are you actually risking? That's the whole reason the terms exist.

Honestly, you either don't understand our position or don't want to. Maybe you're one of the ones banned for this. Either way, I'll stop arguing here — we just don't see it the same way. Peace, my friend.

I understand your point of view. But it is hard to convince people with such an attitude. Allow me to explain how other casinos handle such cases.

Popular casinos like Betfury do not count 100% of the wager as a qualified wager for the bonuses. Let's say someone has to wager $2000 to clear the requirements, and they are going to play Limbo or Dice with low risk, which is actually easy for the players. So, what the casino does is, they count 10% of the wager in original games as a qualified wager. If I place a $10 bet on Dice, the casino counts $1 as a qualified wager, because it was placed in a low-risk game.

The same thing applies to table games as well. You need to come up with a better solution instead of arguing with the players. You should check how your competitors handle such cases.

Good luck!

That’s correct. To avoid any misunderstandings, some casinos exclude "originals" games entirely - that keeps things clear. In such cases, a 35x wagering requirement is acceptable.

But sure, it’s your house, your rules. If someone doesn’t like it, there are plenty of other casinos they can choose from.

We've listened to you guys and changed our rules — now only bets of 1.25 and above count toward the playthrough. This is to avoid people getting banned and has solved a lot of issues. Thanks anyway.

[Mahdirakib]

Unless they have it written in the promotion rules:

Source: https://chasing.bet/vip-transfer
Plenty of casinos have this kind of rule in their promo and bonus T&Cs. Some only count bets toward the wagering requirements if the odds are 1.50 or higher.

Plenty of casinos indeed have this type of rules, and those casinos have in-built system to not qualify the wager made with small multiplier. But you will never find any casinos to confiscate user deposits for playing with low multipliers. Because it isn't possible to manipulate the game result or beat the house by playing on such low multiplier. How can a casino justify confiscating a user deposit for this?

~ This is not an isolated incident. We have encountered this pattern of bonus abuse repeatedly — both in the past and continuing today — and it is precisely because of this history that we cannot simply return funds whenever a complaint is made. Doing so would only invite the same abuse again and again. ~snip~

It proves that Chasing.bet has created a trap to scam users legitimate deposits. You should exclude the wager of in-house games instead of confiscating users deposits. Based on that term, you have the rights to forfeit the given bonus amount, not the deposits.

[chasing.bet]

Unless they have it written in the promotion rules:

Source: https://chasing.bet/vip-transfer
Plenty of casinos have this kind of rule in their promo and bonus T&Cs. Some only count bets toward the wagering requirements if the odds are 1.50 or higher.

Plenty of casinos indeed have this type of rules, and those casinos have in-built system to not qualify the wager made with small multiplier. But you will never find any casinos to confiscate user deposits for playing with low multipliers. Because it isn't possible to manipulate the game result or beat the house by playing on such low multiplier. How can a casino justify confiscating a user deposit for this?

~ This is not an isolated incident. We have encountered this pattern of bonus abuse repeatedly — both in the past and continuing today — and it is precisely because of this history that we cannot simply return funds whenever a complaint is made. Doing so would only invite the same abuse again and again. ~snip~

It proves that Chasing.bet has created a trap to scam users legitimate deposits. You should exclude the wager of in-house games instead of confiscating users deposits. Based on that term, you have the rights to forfeit the given bonus amount, not the deposits.

A "trap to scam your shitty $5"? Compare that to players who already got paid and walked away with my money — usually 30x or 40x that amount. So calling this a trap is just a stupid take overall, lol.

And don't make me remind you: before you take that bonus, we always show our rules — we don't hide them. If you read them, still deposited, and still pulled this stunt, then you deserved what you got. You call it a trap when you clearly just ignored the rules???

Honestly, I should just ignore this from now on — the more I argue about it, the dumber I feel.

[Nathrixxx]

I was navigating around the internet to see if there are any reviews on the site and in Trustpilot I didn't see chase.bet but there is a related casino review which is https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.chasebet.com.au. op do have an idea on this www.chasebet.com.au casino? Though the casino reputation there is not bad. Op I checked your website and moved around it and the creation of the site is not bad. You can contact a manager for any possible promotions in the forum. Welcome.

Who knows maybe they are still the ones that once bear that same ID before they changeed to this current one, but that is not even the issue here because those you discover don't even have any bad reputation from what you have seen online that was talked about them, which I think is a good sign to also link together with this and I hope they will stand to represent the platform in a more professional manner and be trusted as always expected.

[Mahdirakib]

A "trap to scam your shitty $5"? Compare that to players who already got paid and walked away with my money — usually 30x or 40x that amount. So calling this a trap is just a stupid take overall, lol.
And don't make me remind you: before you take that bonus, we always show our rules — we don't hide them. If you read them, still deposited, and still pulled this stunt, then you deserved what you got. You call it a trap when you clearly just ignored the rules???

I have never made any deposit on your platform. And I don't have any interest in making any deposits on your platform after reading this reply of yours. At the same time, I would like to encourage other forum members not to make any deposits on this platform. Because the owner of Chasing.bet thinks it is fair to confiscate user deposits if the user plays with higher winning probability. Higher winning probability doesn't guarantee the profits.

I can see that you have minimum winning odds to 1.25× for the wager requirement. As the way you have planned the VIP transfer offer, it will attract the bonus hunters more than the actual gamblers.

Honestly, I should just ignore this from now on — the more I argue about it, the dumber I feel.

Ignoring this forum won't change anything. You should improve your system by following the fair criticism of the gamblers. You have lost your temper too quickly here. Are you really the owner of this casino?

[Cantsay]

And on the "any multiplier is fair and square" point — sure, with your own money. But with bonus funds, what are you actually risking? That's the whole reason the terms exist.

Honestly, you either don't understand our position or don't want to. Maybe you're one of the ones banned for this. Either way, I'll stop arguing here — we just don't see it the same way. Peace, my friend.

Did you read your terms after it was generated for you? Take a closer look you would see the minimum odds you are talking about apply from today, which is the 31st of October, and since we can't tell what was there in the past, it is safer to assume that you included that clause after you banned that user. If that is true, it means that your terms don't apply to that user, and you might as well just settle him to avoid drama that might cost your than just $500.

[JeromeTash]

For some reason, I haven’t received a reply to my email yet. I sent the messages more than three hours ago.

You have to be patient and wait for a little more than 24 hours at the very least since they usually take while to get a response from the technical team or you could try the livechat option for near-instant responses but you may have to first register/login