Which is the most profitable investment: Bitcoin, land, or physical gold?

[Outhue]

Your land can be seized by the government, they will put their point on the fact that the country needs the land for development and you will either be compensated or not, all lands in the end still belongs to the government, so lands can be forcefully taken and gold can also be forcefully taken from you by robbers, but Bitcoin can't , unless you spread the news with your mouth that you have some Bitcoin, even now that many people still don't know about the value of Bitcoin I am scared of wrench attacks, silence is the best answer as a Bitcoin holder and as for others I would rather have 70% in Bitcoin and 30% spilt into land properties and physical gold.

[CucakRowo]

Your land can be seized by the government, they will put their point on the fact that the country needs the land for development and you will either be compensated or not, all lands in the end still belongs to the government, so lands can be forcefully taken and gold can also be forcefully taken from you by robbers, but Bitcoin can't , unless you spread the news with your mouth that you have some Bitcoin, even now that many people still don't know about the value of Bitcoin I am scared of wrench attacks, silence is the best answer as a Bitcoin holder and as for others I would rather have 70% in Bitcoin and 30% spilt into land properties and physical gold.

Its not just land and gold. Any physical asset can be seized. That's one of the downsides of owning tangible assets, although these things are relatively rare.
Bitcoin gives you privacy cause its digital, sure. But self custody has its own set of risks, like losing seedphrase or getting coerced into handing over wallet access through wrench attacks, as you said.
Worse, getting lost or stolen BTC back is next to impossible, transactions can't be reversed and there's no refund desk to call.
In the end, every asset has its pros and cons. And whatever you own, keeping a low profile and not showing off your wealth is probably the way to go.
Criminals do not only go after Bitcoin. They will happily take your gold and other physical assets too.

[Sarah_Jannat42]

Bitcoin is currently more accessible to the public, but what others think is high volatility, sometimes parents used to not want to invest in highly volatile assets.
Likewise, gold is now easy to access, digital gold has been scattered everywhere including in crypto, this is a stable asset.

The demand for land is also high who invest in this field, but you must know this kind of property has high taxes including the buying and selling process, but you must have a strategic place in the city center to own land so that it can be said to be productive to make money.

As experienced I'm with crypto market, if you ask me where I can buy Gold online, I don't know. I know shops around market that sell Gold and I can access them but that will be a stress, even I don't know any online forex exchange to buy them. The ones on centralized crypto exchanges are not real stock, they are just traditional finance backed by data, you can't withdraw them and put them on your personal care unlike Bitcoin you can buy and withdraw to your external wallet address.

If we are to compare historical performance from Bitcoin and any traditional finance investment, I will glady bed with Bitcoin than buy physical Gold. If I'm gift, I will humbly accept them and may sell them and put the money back into Bitcoin. I can't risk having Gold in my house, many people I know that were attack by armed robbers for having Gold at home.

Nowadays, holding physical assets carries significant risks. For instance, cash kept in ones pocket or stored at home could be stolen or taken during a robbery at any time. Consequently people are increasingly reluctant to carry cash for shopping or to conduct transactions using physical currency. I have even seen instances where robberies have occurred in duplex-style home. In this context investing in Bitcoin is a sound decision. Furthermore, given that cash and other physical assets are vulnerable to the effects of inflation, I believe that investing in Bitcoin hold great potential.

[Ayers]

Nowadays, holding physical assets carries significant risks. For instance, cash kept in ones pocket or stored at home could be stolen or taken during a robbery at any time. Consequently people are increasingly reluctant to carry cash for shopping or to conduct transactions using physical currency. I have even seen instances where robberies have occurred in duplex-style home. In this context investing in Bitcoin is a sound decision. Furthermore, given that cash and other physical assets are vulnerable to the effects of inflation, I believe that investing in Bitcoin hold great potential.

come on, bitcoin could well be best performing asset and we have got every reason to put money into it. but do not be so biased.

bitcoin isn't immune to risk either. your btc can get hacked or stolen, and one careless slip with your private key and you lose access to your coins for good. every asset has its own risks, bitcoin included.

bitcoin isn't the only hedge against inflation or store of value, either. gold and real estate keep appreciating year after year. at times, they've even delivered better returns than bitcoin.

[tabas]

come on, bitcoin could well be best performing asset and we have got every reason to put money into it. but do not be so biased.

bitcoin isn't immune to risk either. your btc can get hacked or stolen, and one careless slip with your private key and you lose access to your coins for good. every asset has its own risks, bitcoin included.

bitcoin isn't the only hedge against inflation or store of value, either. gold and real estate keep appreciating year after year. at times, they've even delivered better returns than bitcoin.

You're right that there are also the other assets that are also good as hedge against inflation. But definitely no doubt that bitcoin is the best choice of them all especially for those who have put more to bitcoin than any other assets that they can opt to. Real estate is a good one if you're generating cash flow in it. And for me, it doesn't matter if you live in it or not because as you have said it is appreciating. Although if I'll be getting a real estate, I would like to live in it and enjoy it like having a dream home that I can retire too.

[9ja Amaka]

Your land can be seized by the government, they will put their point on the fact that the country needs the land for development and you will either be compensated or not, all lands in the end still belongs to the government, so lands can be forcefully taken and gold can also be forcefully taken from you by robbers, but Bitcoin can't , unless you spread the news with your mouth that you have some Bitcoin, even now that many people still don't know about the value of Bitcoin I am scared of wrench attacks, silence is the best answer as a Bitcoin holder and as for others I would rather have 70% in Bitcoin and 30% spilt into land properties and physical gold.

Land is not owned by an individual who bought the land. It is owned by the government by law. However, the government has the right to take the land if it's needed at any given time but with the C of O, meaning certificate of occupancy as it is called in my country, there is a legal evidence stating that the occupancy was given the land by the government thereby they person will be compensated in certain cases of revocation.

[Texac]

Your land can be seized by the government, they will put their point on the fact that the country needs the land for development and you will either be compensated or not, all lands in the end still belongs to the government, so lands can be forcefully taken and gold can also be forcefully taken from you by robbers, but Bitcoin can't , unless you spread the news with your mouth that you have some Bitcoin, even now that many people still don't know about the value of Bitcoin I am scared of wrench attacks, silence is the best answer as a Bitcoin holder and as for others I would rather have 70% in Bitcoin and 30% spilt into land properties and physical gold.

Land is not owned by an individual who bought the land. It is owned by the government by law. However, the government has the right to take the land if it's needed at any given time but with the C of O, meaning certificate of occupancy as it is called in my country, there is a legal evidence stating that the occupancy was given the land by the government thereby they person will be compensated in certain cases of revocation.

It's not just certain cases, most land revocations come with compensation rules for legal owner. Besides, land seizures aren't something that happens frequently or arbitrarily . So I don't think this is a valid reason to argue that Bitcoin is a better investment.

Bitcoin has its own risks too, wrench attacks included, which you (Outhue) brought up yourself. Every asset has its own strengths and risks . Just pick based on your own criteria and how much risk you're willing to take.

[trendcoin]

I don’t think it makes much sense to draw a distinction between them. In my opinion, these are all good investments that we can compare in terms of profitability over time.

I don’t think I’m doing Bitcoin an injustice by saying this, because in fact, by listing Bitcoin alongside traditional investment vehicles like gold and real estate, I actually feel I’m honoring it. The fact that it has joined their ranks so quickly is nothing short of miraculous.

However, we must acknowledge that real estate and gold also have their drawbacks. For example, when travel to other planets becomes easier and we establish settlements there, today’s real estate market could suddenly be shaken up, or the supply of gold could suddenly increase as a result of chemical experiments or mining operations on those planets.

In this regard, we could even say that Bitcoin has an advantage over gold and real estate.

[ChocolateBitcoinK]

Your land can be seized by the government, they will put their point on the fact that the country needs the land for development and you will either be compensated or not, all lands in the end still belongs to the government, so lands can be forcefully taken and gold can also be forcefully taken from you by robbers, but Bitcoin can't , unless you spread the news with your mouth that you have some Bitcoin, even now that many people still don't know about the value of Bitcoin I am scared of wrench attacks, silence is the best answer as a Bitcoin holder and as for others I would rather have 70% in Bitcoin and 30% spilt into land properties and physical gold.

Land is not owned by an individual who bought the land. It is owned by the government by law. However, the government has the right to take the land if it's needed at any given time but with the C of O, meaning certificate of occupancy as it is called in my country, there is a legal evidence stating that the occupancy was given the land by the government thereby they person will be compensated in certain cases of revocation.

It's not just certain cases, most land revocations come with compensation rules for legal owner. Besides, land seizures aren't something that happens frequently or arbitrarily . So I don't think this is a valid reason to argue that Bitcoin is a better investment.

Bitcoin has its own risks too, wrench attacks included, which you (Outhue) brought up yourself. Every asset has its own strengths and risks . Just pick based on your own criteria and how much risk you're willing to take.

If you want the best control and hassle-free investment, I would definitely say Bitcoin investment, in all other types of investments you have to take care of different things, the issue you mentioned, there are often various problems with land, such as the land seizure you mentioned, as well as various other problems with paperwork. But in the case of Bitcoin, there are none of these, it can be controlled very clearly, and the complete ownership is with you, there is no third party.

But in the end, it is certainly true that no matter what asset you invest in, there will be some kind of risk. In the case of Bitcoin, we also get complete control over it, but at the end of the day, there is no guarantee that Bitcoin can definitely give us profit. And each asset has different risks and each investment has to be considered first, investing blindly can definitely only cause you loss.

[Taricoins]

Your land can be seized by the government, they will put their point on the fact that the country needs the land for development and you will either be compensated or not, all lands in the end still belongs to the government, so lands can be forcefully taken and gold can also be forcefully taken from you by robbers, but Bitcoin can't , unless you spread the news with your mouth that you have some Bitcoin, even now that many people still don't know about the value of Bitcoin I am scared of wrench attacks, silence is the best answer as a Bitcoin holder and as for others I would rather have 70% in Bitcoin and 30% spilt into land properties and physical gold.

I do not agree with your post, maybe your country is not democratic and if it is, it's not nice that you spit fiction just to prove a point, the government cannot seize a legally acquired land or property that doesn't possess any threat to the environment with market price compensation regardless of the intent of the government whether to contract road ot other amenities, it's even in my countries constitution, maybe I will reiterate and say it's your country. 

With that point being made, land still proves to be the most profitable because it takes just one new road to boost the market price, you can even go 10x.

[püsür]

It is, of course, impossible to give a short answer to this question. Moreover, there are millions of possibilities and a vast number of parameters. We can predict, more or less, what will happen to the price of gold. It may rise by a certain amount, and we can guess the maximum multiple by which it could increase. As for Bitcoin, however, no one can say exactly how high it might go. Nor can we say how long it will take to reach that level. But, for example, whilst it’s currently around 75k, I do think it could rise tenfold from here. It might take a long time, though. I don’t think gold will do that, though. As for the ‘Land’ scenario, some places might manage it, whilst others might not. Still, I consider the likelihood of it happening to be low. Better to consider a lot of possibilities with our investments.

[HelliumZ]

Currently, the global demand for Bitcoin, land, and physical gold has increased significantly. If Bitcoin could simply be made more accessible to people, it would top their list of investment options.

In my opinion, Bitcoin is the most reliable and profitable option; do you think the same?

Of course, I think Bitcoin is a significant profitable investment but it has to be held over time. Suddenly, no one can get rich by entering Bitcoin, rather he has to wait and if he waits and holds for a certain period of time, he will definitely get profit. However, if I compare between gold and land, I will give great importance to land. Because land is an investment that only increases in price over time. If I want to say in the context of my country, between gold and land, land gives much more profit than gold.

[Swordsoffreedom]

However, if I compare between gold and land, I will give great importance to land. Because land is an investment that only increases in price over time. If I want to say in the context of my country, between gold and land, land gives much more profit than gold.

That depends tho. Land value is heavily tied to location. Not all plots are worth the same, and not all of them appreciate over time. Land in area with little demand, poor infrastructure or far from major economic centre can appreciate very slowly, or even lose value. On the other hand, a plot in a prime location can deliver return that far outperform gold.

So can't just generalize and say land is always better investment than gold.

[Sarah_Jannat42]

Nowadays, holding physical assets carries significant risks. For instance, cash kept in ones pocket or stored at home could be stolen or taken during a robbery at any time. Consequently people are increasingly reluctant to carry cash for shopping or to conduct transactions using physical currency. I have even seen instances where robberies have occurred in duplex-style home. In this context investing in Bitcoin is a sound decision. Furthermore, given that cash and other physical assets are vulnerable to the effects of inflation, I believe that investing in Bitcoin hold great potential.

come on, bitcoin could well be best performing asset and we have got every reason to put money into it. but do not be so biased.

bitcoin isn't immune to risk either. your btc can get hacked or stolen, and one careless slip with your private key and you lose access to your coins for good. every asset has its own risks, bitcoin included.

bitcoin isn't the only hedge against inflation or store of value, either. gold and real estate keep appreciating year after year. at times, they've even delivered better returns than bitcoin.

You are correct there are indeed security issues concerning Bitcoin; perhaps I have become a bit too biased toward it. However, no one would be indifferent to the security of their Bitcoin, just as someone who buys a piece of land would take great care to protect the associated legal documents. Furthermore, I believe that real estate investments in densely populated areas tend to yield good profits. Therefore, I think that if a person owns land for residential purposes and is also involved with Bitcoin, it would likely increase their interest in Bitcoin. This is my perspective, though it is possible that my line of thinking is flawed.

[Abiky]

I don’t think it makes much sense to draw a distinction between them. In my opinion, these are all good investments that we can compare in terms of profitability over time.

I don’t think I’m doing Bitcoin an injustice by saying this, because in fact, by listing Bitcoin alongside traditional investment vehicles like gold and real estate, I actually feel I’m honoring it. The fact that it has joined their ranks so quickly is nothing short of miraculous.

However, we must acknowledge that real estate and gold also have their drawbacks. For example, when travel to other planets becomes easier and we establish settlements there, today’s real estate market could suddenly be shaken up, or the supply of gold could suddenly increase as a result of chemical experiments or mining operations on those planets.

In this regard, we could even say that Bitcoin has an advantage over gold and real estate.

Bitcoin's biggest advantage is its censorship-resistant design. It cannot be easily seized by governments or third-parties (self-custody only). It can also be sent anywhere in the world (borderless), fast and cheap (sort of). Gold is often bulky (cumbersome) and expensive to carry around. Real estate (land or properties) are transferrable, but their profitability depends on location.

Bitcoin is often considered the most profitable investment, simply because returns are often higher over the long-term. It outperformed Gold, real estate, and any other asset on Earth. See the charts for yourself. What BTC's experiencing right now (decline in market prices) is only temporary. Same as Gold. They will rebound, but Bitcoin will rise by a higher margin. It's always a good idea to diversify between the aforementioned assets just to minimize risks. Never put all of your eggs in one basket, and there should be nothing to worry about.

[angrybirdy]

However, if I compare between gold and land, I will give great importance to land. Because land is an investment that only increases in price over time. If I want to say in the context of my country, between gold and land, land gives much more profit than gold.

That depends tho. Land value is heavily tied to location. Not all plots are worth the same, and not all of them appreciate over time. Land in area with little demand, poor infrastructure or far from major economic centre can appreciate very slowly, or even lose value. On the other hand, a plot in a prime location can deliver return that far outperform gold.

So can't just generalize and say land is always better investment than gold.

personally, i do believe that one aspects that needs to be taken into consideration is the maintenance cost of the specific investment... if it is a land, paying taxes should not forget, the legal costs and some costs which may not be factored in whole estimating the exact value of the asser.  if it is a gold investment, its kinda different as it does not require any maintenance, however, the storing and keeping it safe in our hands are the main thing to be considered... also the ability to  sell those investments is one thing which really needs to considered because being able to have something from it is really different from making a money from it.

[Ever-young]

On the two basis you stated, ( profitability and reliability) they all have a place. With what I know, people are investing, making profits, and are still very valid high value assets till date.

The truth is you; sharing knowledge to peoples understanding, needs you to be knowledgeable About it first. A bitcoin holder will always chose bitcoin, the people who also invest in Gold and land will do same.

So personally what I can tell you about is Bitcoin, and I’ll continue to choose bitcoin over and over again against every other assets. Mind you, this doesn’t make those assets any lesser, I read about the pros and cons of many assets before I chosed bitcoin.

We’re talking about a digital asset here, others are tangible but bitcoin still rose as a competitor, but them all and till now, no competitor of bitcoin has stood a chance.

Bitcoin over them all.

[Rhow]

Currently, the global demand for Bitcoin, land, and physical gold has increased significantly. If Bitcoin could simply be made more accessible to people, it would top their list of investment options.

In my opinion, Bitcoin is the most reliable and profitable option; do you think the same?

Of course, I think Bitcoin is a significant profitable investment but it has to be held over time. Suddenly, no one can get rich by entering Bitcoin, rather he has to wait and if he waits and holds for a certain period of time, he will definitely get profit. However, if I compare between gold and land, I will give great importance to land. Because land is an investment that only increases in price over time. If I want to say in the context of my country, between gold and land, land gives much more profit than gold.

It is important to have a patient mindset when investing in Bitcoin. Because there are many people who sell all of their Bitcoins out of greed when the price increases, and many others decide to sell them out of fear when the price decreases. There is no guarantee that you will make profit if you hold them for a long time. Again, the price of land will always increase, which also depends on the demand and situation in the area. In many countries, land prices increase at a high rate, so it is natural for land to seem like an attractive investment. It is also true that Buying land ,requires a lot of money, which not everyone can afford, and there may have also problems with ownership. In a market downturn, such investments carry the risk of significant losses.
 
You can invest in Bitcoin little by little according to your ability, which is convenient for many. For me, it is more important to understand your financial condition and invest in the right place than which investment is better.

[lombok]

On the two basis you stated, ( profitability and reliability) they all have a place. With what I know, people are investing, making profits, and are still very valid high value assets till date.

The truth is you; sharing knowledge to peoples understanding, needs you to be knowledgeable About it first. A bitcoin holder will always chose bitcoin, the people who also invest in Gold and land will do same.

So personally what I can tell you about is Bitcoin, and I’ll continue to choose bitcoin over and over again against every other assets. Mind you, this doesn’t make those assets any lesser, I read about the pros and cons of many assets before I chosed bitcoin.

We’re talking about a digital asset here, others are tangible but bitcoin still rose as a competitor, but them all and till now, no competitor of bitcoin has stood a chance.

Bitcoin over them all.

Complete faith in the selection of investment asset comes only with a thorough knowledge after analyzing its numerous benefits and risks. Each investor has his own criteria in selecting a form of wealth storage; it could be real estate, gold, or even virtual assets such as Bitcoin. The loyalty to a chosen primary virtual asset does not undermine the value of a tangible asset which has proved itself over centuries. Rather, it is a case of matching with your own financial dreams and aspirations. So far, the proven performance and scarce supply of Bitcoin have helped it retain its lead in the world of virtual assets.

[Botnake]

Currently, the global demand for Bitcoin, land, and physical gold has increased significantly. If Bitcoin could simply be made more accessible to people, it would top their list of investment options.

In my opinion, Bitcoin is the most reliable and profitable option; do you think the same?

Why do you have to stick to one when you can invest in all of them even with a small amount first?

Its undeniable that bitcoin is the most reliable and profitable option, but investing in bitcoin does not mean guaranteed profits all along. There are some unseen losses that you may experience first, and the more you get easily bothered by the market changes, the more you fall into panic selling, the bigger losses you will acquire in the end.

Diversification is the only way. If you can make multiple investments and make them work for long term, you are making unlimited flows of income in the future, which is more advantageous than just investing in bitcoin alone.