MORE DISAPOINMENT for nutildah

[nullius]

And this could be particularly useful with some of the AI-related projects and automated content we already have on the forum.

For example:
[...]
- Our beloved ChartBuddy (although I wouldn't dare put him on my ignore list! )
[...]

WTF!?  ChartBuddy doesn’t belong in this discussion.  Notwithstanding that ChartBuddy is an arsehole, and they banned me from the Wall Observer, I must step up to defend ChartBuddy’s honour.  They’re just an innocent bot that posts a chart once an hour!  What has that to do with slop?

You’re defining “AI-related projects and automated content” so broadly, you may as well include my desktop clock.

In addition, it is necessary to take into account and provide for the possibility to ignore publications marked with this sign, in case the user does not want to read the "thoughts of AI." If this feature is implemented, then those who seek to increase the rating will and receive merits noticeably decrease their motivation to create content using AI, as they will realize that their "circle of readers" will significantly decrease.

That would actually be a great feature!

An option to ignore or hide all posts tagged as AI Assisted would give users more control over what they want to read.

Whoops.  My apologies to lovesmayfamilis; I’d jumped over their post with my own reply:

You forgot (?) to include a global auto-ignorelist, which users can set to ignorelist in toto all users who have ever made even one LLM slop post.  I myself never want to waste even ten seconds reading any post by anyone who ever copypastas a chatbot onto the forum—and I reasonably suspect that I’m not alone!

Personal note:  I don’t use an ignorelist.  This thread reminds me I need to start using one for anyone who ever rubs so-called “AI-assisted” shit in my face.

I personally hate anyone who posts LLM slop.  Hate.  “Please fall in a well and die” tier personal hatred.  I absolutely never want to read any posts by them.

Edit:  How could I forget to emphasize...

Even with all prompt jockeys ignorelisted, their slop will leak out in quotes from other users.

Who the fuck wants to read a forum of people talking to chatbots?

[ercewubam]

What if we added a dedicated AI-Assisted icon to Bitcointalk's existing post/topic icons?

Then I will start adding it to my 100% human-written posts, to see, if there are any humans here, or not.

Also, don't forget about putting at least some neutral tag, for being skeptical about AI. You have to be enthusiastic about it! It is our future! Right?

Another thing you should never forget about, is trying to hunt alt-accounts, which are not participating in any signature campaigns. They should also receive at least some neutral tag, to encourage the author to switch to another account, or give him one more reason to leave the forum, and switch to something else.

[JollyGood]

Quite clearly you know you way around the forum therefore a valid question to ask is why are you using a newbie account to post instead of using your real account (or one of your other accounts if you are operating several of them)?

For you to have made such an extensive and detailed post you have obviously exerted a lot of your time, energy and effort. What are your motives for bringing the list to the attention of the community?

~

[SuperBitMan]

Using AI for writing posts should be considered as equivalent of copy-pasting and should lead to permanent ban. Just tagging will not stop them.

One thing I have discovered is that new members in this forum are the ones using AI more and the reason is because they don’t know about the AI rule in this forum, all this newbies don’t read pinned thread before they start posting.
So if they introduce permanent ban on those who use AI it will really affect new members coming to this forum and some of them may be frustrated with the permanent ban, the best is the neutral feedback they are getting and a signature ban will be okay too.
Remember using AI is not against the forum rule, theymos has already outlined how AI should be used and what is considered wrong and good in AI usage in this forum. See for yourself https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5574214.msg66397898#msg66397898

[PrivacyG]

One thing I have discovered is that new members in this forum are the ones using AI more and the reason is because they don’t know about the AI rule in this forum, all this newbies don’t read pinned thread before they start posting.
So if they introduce permanent ban on those who use AI it will really affect new members coming to this forum and some of them may be frustrated with the permanent ban, the best is the neutral feedback they are getting and a signature ban will be okay too.
Remember using AI is not against the forum rule, theymos has already outlined how AI should be used and what is considered wrong and good in AI usage in this forum. See for yourself https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5574214.msg66397898#msg66397898

Using 'AI' to create a post you could and SHOULD write on your own should be banned absolutely everywhere, not just here.  What is next, using Chat GPT to have real life conversations in a bar?

The only situation I would not mind using 'AI' to write text content is when some body wants to write some thing under anonymity.  Other than such situations, it is really infuriating that people are too lazy to THINK nowadays.

[stompix]

Quite clearly you know you way around the forum therefore a valid question to ask is why are you using a newbie account to post instead of using your real account (or one of your other accounts if you are operating several of them)?

No , it's not a valid question and everyone here should stop with this thing!
It's perfectly fine to open a new account these days since we all have seen what happens this days: people will spend more time trying to frame the accuser rather than debating the accusations!

For you to have made such an extensive and detailed post you have obviously exerted a lot of your time, energy and effort.

He had time between baking cookies!

What are your motives for bringing the list to the attention of the community?

Ten more posts like this, and you get to bang Lana Rhoades! Known fact, where have you been these years?

Now asking you a serious question and same for the other ones accusing the OP: have you actually checked the list and the users on it?
I will be absolutely sincere: I haven't, apart from one user, this is why I'm not saying that the OP is making up things nor am I saying he is actually right and those users need to be sigbanned.
Would be nice if you would do the same!

Do you think something like this could work, or would it just become another icon that nobody bothers to use?

This will just legitimize AI slop for money!
This would have normally been a forum where users express their opinions and ask for advice, not a copy paste your answer from chatGPT place!
What's the difference between writing an AI post and a LMGTFY link? Oh, yeah, $, that's it!

[Meretrix]

Ten more posts like this, and you get to bang Lana Rhoades!

Why Lana Rhoades?  She doesn’t even do porn anymore, and she’s had some negativity about it.  Or is that a boobie prize, so to speak, for jolly bad arguments?

Ten more posts like this, and you get to bang either Adriana Chechik or the subject of this CENSORED post—I’m not sure which. 

I’d prefer to spam Lukecoin with porn.

It was already done, some NSFW images are pushed to their chain through bitfiles.

NSFW, lols, more like Not Safe for Your Brain, and, just a warning for the newcomers to the subject, curiosity killed the cat.

The concept is nice, but I think that looks potentially LLM-generated? 

Why do LLMs corrupt everything?  I mean, can’t we get some real XXX hardcore porn with real human beings on Lukechain?

Do you think something like this could work, or would it just become another icon that nobody bothers to use?

This will just legitimize AI slop for money!
This would have normally been a forum where users express their opinions and ask for advice, not a copy paste your answer from chatGPT place!

It has been asked in this thread, and thus far not answered:  Why the fuck is LLM slop not covered under the existing copypasta rule?  It’s literally copy-and-paste from another website.  That’s supposed to get a ban.

The only difference is that in some cases of LLM slop, it’s harder to prove the accusation than for old-fashioned methods of plagiarism—and thus, it’s also harder for an innocent party to clear themselves of a false accusation.  This makes LLM slop even worse than other types of plagiarism.

[nullius]

Why was this thread moved to Reputation?  It should be properly a Meta issue for the staff, not a reputational issue for the DT shitshow.

Using 'AI' to create a post you could and SHOULD write on your own should be banned absolutely everywhere, not just here.  What is next, using Chat GPT to have real life conversations in a bar?

...it is really infuriating that people are too lazy to THINK nowadays.

THANK YOU.

The only situation I would not mind using 'AI' to write text content is when some body wants to write some thing under anonymity.

Agreed.  I’ve been quietly thinking about this issue.  Thanks for bringing it up.

How do you suggest an LLM rule should be written, to allow bona fide usage for anonymity without opening a loophole?

I thought I quoted or referenced the following in 2018, but forum search is not finding where (maybe?) I did:

Grammer Critics: Information vs Knowledge
theshadowbrokers
4/10/2017 2:01 AM

TheShadowBrokers shaking heads at arrogant pretentiousness of grammar critics.

[...]  If theshadowbrokers be using own voices, theshadowbrokers be writing peoples from prison or dead. TheShadowBrokers is practicing obfuscation as part of operational security (OPSEC). Is being a spy thing.  [...]  TheShadowBrokers has being operating in country for many months now and USG is still not having fucking clue.

nullius shaking heads at own foolishness.  If nullius be not using own voices, nullius be much more comfortable and confident in own OPSEC.  Is being a spy thing.  nullius has being written many too many words of own voice, worried about USG having fucking clue.

if Nullius uses always from start machine to writing for them, result maybe unuglier and more more anonymous.  But too late, as the cat is out of the bag.

Subject: 🤮 This post was human-generated, and deserves a punishment
...my 100% human-written posts, to see, if there are any humans here, or not.

LOL.  Thanks for making me laugh.

Another thing you should never forget about, is trying to hunt alt-accounts, which are not participating in any signature campaigns. They should also receive at least some neutral tag, to encourage the author to switch to another account, or give him one more reason to leave the forum, and switch to something else.

When there is not even a scintilla of evidence of financial fraud or deceptive sockpuppeting, I think that the obsessive alt-hunters have an attitude close to idiots who want a KYCed Internet with Real Names policies like Facebook.  Also, they are paranoid control freaks with severe mental illness.

Please don’t let them get you down.  Some of us sincerely don’t give a fuck what your “main account” or old account or other alts may or may not be—just as long as there’s no evidence of financial fraud, nor of deceptive sockpuppetting with a farm of covert alts under the rubric of being definitely different people to manipulate the discourse with a social Sybil attack.

P.S., where may I please apply to be your alt?  Thanks.

Quite clearly you know you way around the forum therefore a valid question to ask is why are you using a newbie account to post instead of using your real account (or one of your other accounts if you are operating several of them)?

Why do you care?  Or to put it another way:  Do you suggest that what you just said should have been my response, when Brand New scam_detector accused my forum girlfriend of being a scammer?

I recently had cause to review the history of the biggest sex scandal in forum history.  [...]

[ABCbits]

The only situation I would not mind using 'AI' to write text content is when some body wants to write some thing under anonymity.

Do you mean using AI to avoid stylometry analysis and such? I wonder how well it works in practice, without changing point you try to tell.

Other than such situations, it is really infuriating that people are too lazy to THINK nowadays.

If this forum have less spam, i would argue it's also acceptable when asking for help or support. But on this forum, it's easy to imagine account farmer create thread/post that pretend looking for help/support. After all, i've seen some account copy-paste question from other website/thread, such as https://bitlist.co/topic/5580001 and https://bitlist.co/topic/5585413.

What are your motives for bringing the list to the attention of the community?

Ten more posts like this, and you get to bang Lana Rhoades! Known fact, where have you been these years?

Now asking you a serious question and same for the other ones accusing the OP: have you actually checked the list and the users on it?
I will be absolutely sincere: I haven't, apart from one user, this is why I'm not saying that the OP is making up things nor am I saying he is actually right and those users need to be sigbanned.
Would be nice if you would do the same!

FWIW i haven't looked at OP's list. But i remember some of listed account are either in my ignore list or tagged by me, so it's probably worthy for further check, assuming anyone bothered to do it.

[DireWolfM14]

Quite clearly you know you way around the forum therefore a valid question to ask is why are you using a newbie account to post instead of using your real account (or one of your other accounts if you are operating several of them)?

You really need to stop doing this.  It's far from the first time you've encountered someone creating an alt to call out established members, and it's far from the first time that you've been reminded it's a totally legit use of an alt.

And let stompix's word be a warning to you;

Ten more posts like this, and you get are forced to bang Lana Rhoades! Known fact, where have you been these years?

A sewer pipe with plastic filler and lipstick is still a sewer pipe.

[Meretrix]

Ten more posts like this, and you get are forced to bang Lana Rhoades! Known fact, where have you been these years?

A sewer pipe with plastic filler and lipstick is still a sewer pipe.

Not cool.  I’m no fan of Lana Rhoades; for opposite reasons, I criticized her in my prior post.  But I will defend her from stigmatizing hate by “[t]he misogynists who cannot respect a woman purely because they have, enjoy or have been seen having sex”.

Lana Rhoades is a human being.  Not “a sewer pipe”.

The irony of this post:  It interrupts my work on a long Meretrix post in the other thread about why we should spam Lukecoin with porn.  That’s neither a joke nor a triviality.  It’s a serious answer to Luke’s misogyny, his authoritarianism, his advocacy of censorship, his desire for a theocratic monarchy, and his public declaration that masturbation is a sin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Luke-Jr&oldid=928063633


https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/42guxq/is_having_remote_virtual_sex_a_sin_if_you_arent/czas8qq/?context=3

[Baseplate]

Lana Rhoades is a human being.  Not “a sewer pipe”.

Nobody forced her to whore herself out like she did (along with the countless other women in the porn industry), they all chose to dishonor themselves by selling their souls to the industry and both should be called out for it. Shaming someone does not dehumanise them, you degen.

[DireWolfM14]

Not cool.

Sorry, let me rephrase that:

A cumbucket with plastic filler and lipstick is still a cumbucket.

As for calling me a misogynist for expressing my preference for women who do not sell their bodies, is not not an attempt to stigmatize me for my choices?  

And for the record, I've stopped caring when people call me racist, homophobic, transphobic, sexist, misogynistic, antisemitic, xenophobic...  The list goes on.  All those words were coined by people who want to stigmatize me for choosing to maintain my dignity, preserve the honor and dignity of my family, and for expecting the same of my community regardless of their ethnic, religious, or racial background.  I make no differentiation between people of any creed who are honorable and respectful of themselves and others.

And to augment the record, I would have referred to a male porn performer as a dip-stick, because I see that as being just as shameful.

Anyway, sorry for OT, I won't continue this line of talk in this thread.

[nullius]

Lana Rhoades is a human being.  Not “a sewer pipe”.

Nobody forced her to whore herself out like she did (along with the countless other women in the porn industry), they all chose to dishonor themselves by selling their souls to the industry and both should be called out for it. Shaming someone does not dehumanise them, you degen.

FYI, you’re talking to my alt, you hateful lunatic.  I will say this with my main account, to make sure that everyone knows I am putting my name on it:

I’m calling you out and shaming you for dehumanizing someone with your misogynist morals.

I’m doing this no differently than I would for a gay person, or for anyone else who suffers bigotry based on nonsense.  I will NOT shut up and quietly ignore these hateful remarks.

I repeat, in my own voice:  Lana Rhoades is a human being, not a “sewer pipe”, and it’s outrageous and reprehensible to dehumanize her that way.

There’s no shame in being a sex worker.  I myself openly had a relationship on this forum [sexual thread] with someone who was theymos-verified as a camgirl; the only problem with that was that this person turned out to be... not who and what they said they were.  I treated putatively-her no differently than I would treat any other person, in the sense that I treated her with respect—as a human being.  Oddly enough, that was the time when I was most popular on this forum; what the fuck has changed in the culture here?

The reason, and the only reason why the trust feedback referencing this post is neutral is my longtime policy (which perhaps I should reconsider?) not to red-tag for opinions.  However, to be frank, I would not do business with you—and I don’t think anyone else should, either.


Posted while I was writing the above:

Not cool.

Sorry, let me rephrase that:

A cumbucket with plastic filler and lipstick is still a cumbucket.

Yeah, see, now, you’re being coyly ambiguous.  Some porn stars call themselves “cumbuckets”, and are proud of it.

But does Lana Rhoades have implants?  I don’t know.  It is a question of fact.

Edit in response to DireWolM14’s edit—everything above this line was written before I saw the extension below:

Not cool.

Sorry, let me rephrase that:

A cumbucket with plastic filler and lipstick is still a cumbucket.

As for calling me a misogynist for expressing my preference for women who do not sell their bodies, is not not an attempt to stigmatize me for my choices?  

I’m all for stigmatizing people who treat a woman as an object valued according to some notion of moral “virtue”.

And for the record, I've stopped caring when people call me racist, homophobic, transphobic, sexist, misogynistic, antisemitic, xenophobic...  The list goes on.  All those words were coined by people who want to stigmatize me for

In this case, that for is for imposing on them morals that they don’t believe in.  Expect the same to be done to you in return.

choosing to maintain my dignity, preserve the honor and dignity of my family, and for expecting the same of my community regardless of their ethnic, religious, or racial background.  I make no differentiation between people of any creed who are honorable and respectful of themselves and others.

Despite your attempt to make this sound inclusive, the moral that you’re preaching is rooted in religion, and unsupportable without it.

And to augment the record, I would have referred to a male porn performer as a dip-stick, because I see that as being just as shameful.

Okay, then instead of calling you “misogynist”, how about “repressive”.

(Baseplate’s statement is unambiguously misogynist.)

[Baseplate]

FYI, you’re talking to my alt, you hateful lunatic.  I will say this with my main account, to make sure that everyone knows I am putting my name on it:

I’m calling you out and shaming you for dehumanizing someone with your misogynist morals.

Am I supposed to give a fuck? How exactly am I misogynistic if I am calling out whore behaviour? I don't hate women dumbass, but sure, go ahead and make your assumptions xD.

I’m doing this no differently than I would for a gay person, or for anyone else who suffers bigotry based on nonsense.  I will NOT shut up and quietly ignore these hateful remarks.

I repeat, in my own voice:  Lana Rhoades is a human being, not a “sewer pipe”, and it’s outrageous and reprehensible to dehumanize her that way.

Again, am I supposed to give a shit? You obviously lack self-respect if you believe that being a prostitute is a dignified career choice for women. Mind you, SHE HERSELF has said that she regrets pursuing a career as a pornstar, so why the fuck are you here speaking on behalf of sex workers? Know your place dude.

There’s no shame in being a sex worker.  I myself openly had a relationship on this forum [sexual thread] with someone who was theymos-verified as a camgirl

Oof, you really DO lack self-respect xD. Is all this just cope from your end or sum?

The reason, and the only reason why the trust feedback referencing this post is neutral is my longtime policy (which perhaps I should reconsider?) not to red-tag for opinions.  However, to be frank, I would not do business with you—and I don’t think anyone else should, either.

Trust me, just reading the negative feedback you've received over the years, I wouldn't do business with you even if you paid me. You're an insignificance and obvious trust abuser who flag people for HAVING AN OPINION. I pray that somewhere in your darkened heart, there is still enough light that will guide you towards restoring your dignity, because Jesus Christ man....

[nullius]

Anyway, sorry for OT, I won't continue this line of talk in this thread.

Although this is a P&S issue, I must address it on the spot for the same reason as if, e.g., someone called a gay person by slurs.  I won’t just shrug and say, “Eh, it’s off-topic here.”

Redouble that in Current Year, when this kind of bullshit is taking over the world.

FYI, you’re talking to my alt, you hateful lunatic.  I will say this with my main account, to make sure that everyone knows I am putting my name on it:

I’m calling you out and shaming you for dehumanizing someone with your misogynist morals.

Am I supposed to give a fuck? How exactly am I misogynistic if I am calling out whore behaviour? I don't hate women dumbass, but sure, go ahead and make your assumptions xD.

It’s oppressive to women to treat them as objects valued according to your idiotic moral system, which is entirely constructed for the purpose of having men control women.  If you’re ignorant on the theory and history of this, I suggest that you go read some feminist texts.

Not to mention that you talk like you just crawled up from the troglodytic depths of the Internet sewer-pipe known as the manosphere.

I’m doing this no differently than I would for a gay person, or for anyone else who suffers bigotry based on nonsense.  I will NOT shut up and quietly ignore these hateful remarks.

I repeat, in my own voice:  Lana Rhoades is a human being, not a “sewer pipe”, and it’s outrageous and reprehensible to dehumanize her that way.

Again, am I supposed to give a shit? You obviously lack self-respect if you believe that being a prostitute is a dignified career choice for women.

I have sufficient self-respect to deem that statement beneath response.  I’m not some insecure moron for you to manipulate.

Mind you, SHE HERSELF has said that she regrets pursuing a career as a pornstar,

It is for exactly that reason that I (via my alt account) criticized Lana Rhoades earlier in the thread:

Why Lana Rhoades?  She doesn’t even do porn anymore, and she’s had some negativity about it.

so why the fuck are you here speaking on behalf of sex workers? Know your place dude.

I’m speaking up for people whom few will dare, much less care to speak for.

Know your place, which is not to tell me my place.

There’s no shame in being a sex worker.  I myself openly had a relationship on this forum [sexual thread] with someone who was theymos-verified as a camgirl

Oof, you really DO lack self-respect xD. Is all this just cope from your end or sum?

Stock manosphere bullshit, beneath reply.  Again, I’m not some insecure moron for you to manipulate.

The reason, and the only reason why the trust feedback referencing this post is neutral is my longtime policy (which perhaps I should reconsider?) not to red-tag for opinions.  However, to be frank, I would not do business with you—and I don’t think anyone else should, either.

Trust me, just reading the negative feedback you've received over the years, I wouldn't do business with you even if you paid me. You're an insignificance and obvious trust abuser who flag people for HAVING AN OPINION.

You spew odious nonsense that I’d want to be warned about before accidentally transacting business with you.  Therefore, I left a neutral warning to others.  Not a “flag”; as you’re new here, you may want to learn how the trust system works before you opine about it.

I’d frankly rather do business with the KKK than with you.  They have some weird ideas, which are offensive to some people—but it’s not as if they’re actually taking over the world.

I pray that somewhere in your darkened heart, there is still enough light that will guide you towards restoring your dignity, because Jesus Christ man....

Fuck your prayers.  Let’s just get this over with:  I don’t believe in your god, I don’t obey any of his commandments, and I despise anyone who tries to impose them on women who enjoy sex just as I do.

Speak thou not of dignity, for thou art beneath contempt.

[Baseplate]

It’s oppressive to women to treat them as objects valued according to your idiotic moral system, which is entirely constructed for the purpose of having men control women.  If you’re ignorant on the theory and history of this, I suggest that you go read some feminist texts.

Not to mention that you talk like you just crawled up from the troglodytic depths of the Internet sewer-pipe known as the manosphere.

And there we have it, "if you don't agree with my feminist views, you are a manosphere misogynist and incel".

Dude, they are objectifying themselves WILLINGLY, what the actual fuck are you talking about? Again, no one FORCED them to whore themselves out to strangers online, that's a choice they made, and they should bear the responsibilities for those choices. For being a feminist, you sure like to absolve women of accountability; almost like you think women are so stupid that men have to bear the responsibilities for their actions. Not very feminist of you now, is it?

Again, I don't hate women, I hate the oversexualised bullshit that is promoted in our societies, if you think that's misogynistic, then go cry me a river already.

I have sufficient self-respect to deem that statement beneath response.  I’m not some insecure moron for you to manipulate.

Calling me "insecure" doesn't really disprove my points, it only makes you look childish. Nobody's tryna manipulate you lol, you are not even worth 1/10th of the effort required for that, pipe down cuz.

I’m speaking up for people whom few will dare, much less care to speak for.

Know your place, which is not to tell me my place.

It's obvious you're a narcissist, just from this quote alone, we can see that 1. you're virtue-signaling HARD, and 2. you are highly defensive when people counter you with different views, to the point that you tag them for it. You're not even worth continuing interacting with, so I will cut this short and just ignore you because narcissists like you are not worth the energy I am wasting on you.

Get help.

[Meretrix]

There’s no shame in being a sex worker.  I myself openly had a relationship on this forum [sexual thread] with someone who was theymos-verified as a camgirl

Oof, you really DO lack self-respect xD. Is all this just cope from your end or sum?

LOL, it got under your skin that nullius is proud to have relationships with sex workers.  What do you find so threatening about the concept?  Well, just wait till you learn the onomastic meaning of his most (in)famous alt account.

Lana Rhoades is a human being.  Not “a sewer pipe”.

Nobody forced her to whore herself out like she did (along with the countless other women in the porn industry), they all chose to dishonor themselves by selling their souls to the industry and both should be called out for it. Shaming someone does not dehumanise them, you degen.

Given that you’re obviously ill-educated, I will help you to use a dictionary to extend your limited vocabulary:

meretrix, noun, plural meretrices

: prostitute

Etymology: Latin, from merēre to earn, gain

That thread is self-moderated by a self-named whore.  You are not welcome there.

[nullius]

Dang, I’m too slow switching accounts.

And there we have it, "if you don't agree with my feminist views, you are a manosphere misogynist and incel".

It’s your comportment and your use of language.  I can spot it a mile away.

You stepped in as a party whip, as a virtue-enforcer, to shout down and personally to insult an apparent Jr. Member who said it’s not cool to use dehumanizing language about a porn star.  It’s the type of tactic that’s been used to push sex (and sexual people) out of public spaces.  I won’t stand for it, and it won’t work on me.

Since you stepped in, you’ve been dropping an extended stream of manosphere clichés—including this:

Dude, they are objectifying themselves WILLINGLY, what the actual fuck are you talking about? Again, no one FORCED them to whore themselves out to strangers online, that's a choice they made, and they should bear the responsibilities for those choices. For being a feminist, you sure like to absolve women of accountability; almost like you think women are so stupid that men have to bear the responsibilities of their actions. Not very feminist of you now, is it?

What’s the logical conclusion here?  Biblical womanhood is the real feminism? 

That’s the cliché.  As for the underlying substance:  That whole paragraph rests on the unstated, but strongly implied premise that such women’s choices are wrong—and thus, they should suffer “accountability” of which I “absolve” them.  I reject the premise.  There’s nothing wrong with sex work.

Again, I don't hate women, I hate the oversexualised bullshit that is promoted in our societies, if you think that's misogynistic, then go cry me a river already.

I hate the repression of people who whine about “oversexualized bullshit”.  If you don’t like it, then go cry me a river already.

I have sufficient self-respect to deem that statement beneath response.  I’m not some insecure moron for you to manipulate.

Calling me "insecure" doesn't really disprove my points, it only makes you look childish. Nobody's tryna manipulate you lol, you are not even worth 1/10th of the effort required for that, pipe down cuz.

More and more clichés, very stereotypical...

1. you're virtue-signaling HARD,

My virtue-signalling level is zero.  You’re the one who stepped in to enforce your own beliefs about virtue, with moralistic and degrading language plus calling Meretrix a “degen”.  I smacked you down hard, and you’re just twisting in the wind here with cliché stock argumentation that I’ve seen a thousand times before—e.g.,

Get help.

Well, that’s a more general cliché when losing an argument.  Are you copying all of your phrases from cue cards?

[stompix]

Why Lana Rhoades?  

Because:



As I was writing that snarky reply I realized that the only pornstar I actually knew by name was Jenna Jameson, and since I was unaware if she is still alive...the above and picked one!
Now, since all the shit that has come after my post is my fault, could you all do me a favor and debate the list the OP has put here (if you care about it at all) and stop with whatever this has degenerated into?