Them say e fit go challenge for court or refund the money.. so if him return the money, wetin him go gain in return, funny how be say nor be only him don get the experience. All these things na dey make centralised exchange dey somehow. I get say them dey try protect the victim of the fraud, so what about these other victims wey there acc don dey restricted.
How Una think say this thing fit take resolve, because crypto don already get him own risk and now person go come still dey fear P2P vendor make him nor go receive fraudulent money... Because in the end na him go lose..
He should go to court and see to the end of the matter, its not his fault that he sold his goods and the customer who bought the goods paid with a fraudulent money, how was he supposed to know that the money from which the customer paid was a stolen money? (i said "goods" because this is exactly the way i will put it in court).
When the matter is in court, what the authorities will need to do is force Bybit to provide the kyc details of the user who bought the goods, i believe from that personal information, they would catch the thief, at least when he returns the crypto asset he bought, then the bank can move the money where ever they want.
But in a case where Bybit does not have the kyc details of the user or the kyc details provided to them is fake, then the authorities must make them(Bybit) return the victim's crypto asset so the bank can move the money to the rightful owner.
This is how i think this matter should be settled in a sane and working country.