Proof-of-Work consensus is an instance of nash equilibrium. But similarities end here.
Its not a theory he is the man.
It has his name in the anagram, its spells "I am nash"
The many was a genius in the field of cryptography.
Ideal money is a paper by nash, read it, once you do you will realize that bitcoin IS ideal money. The similarities do not end 'here', its your ignorance to the obvious that has simply begin there.
It IS nash, and its a question about how long we will continue to suppress this mans work, if he didn't want us to eventually find out he never would have put his name in the pseudo name.
Occasional British English spelling and terminology (such as the phrase "bloody hard") in both source code comments and forum postings work
he was born in 1928
a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts......a Swiss coder and active community member, graphed the time stamps for each of Nakamoto's bitcoin forum posts.....it suggests he resided in a region using the UTC−05:00 or UTC−06:00 time offset. This includes the parts of North America that fall within the Eastern Time Zone and Central Time Zone....
Princeton New Jersey where nash teaches.
I have read most of the entire collective works by this man, most of which is directed towards this phenomenon, we should not feel I am wrong because we are not willing to accept the obvious.
Edit: also you fail to point out that every aspect of this is and has been dealt with as a game.
