|
x8008
|
 |
May 10, 2014, 08:52:28 PM |
|
can anyone with a gaw hosted miner confirm this setting works -p p=4.0;d=2048
|
|
|
|
|
JHammer
Member
 Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 10, 2014, 09:01:45 PM |
|
can anyone with a gaw hosted miner confirm this setting works -p p=4.0;d=2048
Agree.. I would like to know to.. I left the -p out of mine.. As I dont think we need it.. Not sure if it hurts or not having it in there.. On GAW I have never used the -p or -u and it works.. But I so wish GAW could write us up some instructions for the UI and how it all works.. |
|
|
|
|
|
x8008
|
|
May 10, 2014, 09:02:51 PM |
|
can anyone with a gaw hosted miner confirm this setting works -p p=4.0;d=2048
Agree.. I would like to know to.. I left the -p out of mine.. As I dont think we need it.. Not sure if it hurts or not having it in there.. On GAW I have never used the -p or -u and it works.. But I so wish GAW could write us up some instructions for the UI and how it all works.. that would be superb but I have doubts.. |
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
May 10, 2014, 10:05:55 PM |
|
can anyone with a gaw hosted miner confirm this setting works -p p=4.0;d=2048
Agree.. I would like to know to.. I left the -p out of mine.. As I dont think we need it.. Not sure if it hurts or not having it in there.. On GAW I have never used the -p or -u and it works.. But I so wish GAW could write us up some instructions for the UI and how it all works.. What you have to do; use following password: -p is used only in command line to mark that following word is password. Simple as that. |
|
|
|
|
|
x8008
|
|
May 10, 2014, 10:09:03 PM |
|
can anyone with a gaw hosted miner confirm this setting works -p p=4.0;d=2048
Agree.. I would like to know to.. I left the -p out of mine.. As I dont think we need it.. Not sure if it hurts or not having it in there.. On GAW I have never used the -p or -u and it works.. But I so wish GAW could write us up some instructions for the UI and how it all works.. What you have to do; use following password: -p is used only in command line to mark that following word is password. Simple as that. not sure I understand, can you put the full command line that you would use? |
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
May 10, 2014, 10:32:49 PM |
|
Look, how do you use password "abc123" ?
Just replace "abc123" with "p=4.0;d=2048".
|
|
|
|
|
Humancell
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
May 10, 2014, 11:21:33 PM |
|
Thank you for your very fast response to my questions..
One more
So I am going to try this setting with my hosted GAW miners.. Is this the correct format?
p=4.0;d=2048
where do you put this setting? You use it as your password ... ingenious way to send custom parameters into a pool that only requires a BTC address as a user name! |
|
|
|
|
Humancell
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
May 10, 2014, 11:33:43 PM |
|
Try to run it with some logging options and then paste content of file here.
Ok, it was a bit difficult getting log file as the default antminer S1 settings hides cgminers display. So had to kill process and run my own cgminer outputting to log file. Ran it for 5 mins. [2014-05-11 02:09:26] Started cgminer 4.3.2a
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] BitmainAntS1: detected ANT0
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() parse_rxstatus version(3) chain_num(2) fifo_space(
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() parse_rxstatus chain(0) asic_num=32 asic_status=ff
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() parse_rxstatus chain(1) asic_num=32 asic_status=ff
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() set_txconfig
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() succeeded
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] Probing for an alive pool
[2014-05-11 02:09:27] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 256
[2014-05-11 02:09:27] Network diff set to 1M
(5s):0.000 (1m):0.000 (5m):0.000 (15m):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:30] Stratu
[2014-05-11 02:09:30] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:09:30] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 1 old(0)
[2014-05-11 02:09:31] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart
[2014-05-11 02:09:31] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:09:31] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 2 old(1)
(5s):92.75G (1m):11.36G (5m):2.343G (15m):785.4M (avg):157.5Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:32] A
(5s):154.6G (1m):25.31G (5m):5.372G (15m):1.809G (avg):174.4Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:37] R
(5s):177.2G (1m):38.37G (5m):8.405G (15m):2.845G (avg):179.4Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:42] R
[2014-05-11 02:09:46] Accepted c7babcae Diff 328/256 ANT 0
(5s):181.2G (1m):50.02G (5m):11.32G (15m):3.852G (avg):180.7Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:52] R
(5s):173.3G (1m):59.68G (5m):13.97G (15m):4.782G (avg):178.6Gh/s ^M(5s):187.6G (1m):70.53G
(5s):188.6G (1m):79.59G (5m):19.73G (15m):6.827G (avg):181.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:03] R
[2014-05-11 02:10:04] Rejected 8ddd0063 Diff 462/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
[2014-05-11 02:10:04] Accepted e312c1a3 Diff 289/256 ANT 0
(5s):194.1G (1m):88.93G (5m):22.65G (15m):7.878G (avg):183.7Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:08] A
[2014-05-11 02:10:09] Accepted 93979222 Diff 444/256 ANT 0
[2014-05-11 02:10:09] Rejected db8e206e Diff 298/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
[2014-05-11 02:10:11] Rejected 99912a56 Diff 427/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
(5s):189.8G (1m):96.33G (5m):25.27G (15m):8.839G (avg):183.5Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:12] R
(5s):186.6G (1m):103.0G (5m):27.82G (15m):9.784G (avg):183.1Gh/s ^M(5s):188.2G (1m):110.1G
(5s):179.2G (1m):115.4G (5m):32.96G (15m):11.72G (avg):183.3Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:30] N
[2014-05-11 02:10:30] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-05-11 02:10:30] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:10:30] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 3 old(2)
(5s):179.8G (1m):120.6G (5m):35.39G (15m):12.65G (avg):183.1Gh/s ^M(5s):177.9G (1m):125.4G
(5s):178.1G (1m):129.9G (5m):40.19G (15m):14.52G (avg):183.0Gh/s ^M(5s):181.1G (1m):133.8G
[2014-05-11 02:10:47] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:10:48] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 4 old(3)
[2014-05-11 02:10:49] Rejected 7d43d949 Diff 523/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
(5s):173.5G (1m):136.6G (5m):44.58G (15m):16.28G (avg):181.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:52] R
(5s):179.9G (1m):140.2G (5m):46.82G (15m):17.19G (avg):181.8Gh/s ^M(5s):183.9G (1m):143.8G
[2014-05-11 02:11:17] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:11:17] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 5 old(4)
(5s):177.4G (1m):153.0G (5m):57.32G (15m):21.61G (avg):181.0Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:22] R
[2014-05-11 02:11:24] Rejected bbe1cbee Diff 349/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
(5s):180.8G (1m):155.3G (5m):59.37G (15m):22.49G (avg):181.0Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:29] R
(5s):176.6G (1m):157.0G (5m):61.31G (15m):23.34G (avg):180.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:36] S
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 512
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] Network diff set to 8G
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
(5s):160.2G (1m):157.0G (5m):63.13G (15m):24.20G (avg):179.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:39] P
[2014-05-11 02:11:39] Rejected 9c7100ee Diff 419/256 ANT 0 (Job not found.)
[2014-05-11 02:11:41] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[2014-05-11 02:11:41] Rejected 4285d4c5 Diff 985/256 ANT 0 (Job not found.)
[2014-05-11 02:11:42] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 6 old(5)
(5s):174.0G (1m):159.7G (5m):65.00G (15m):25.01G (avg):180.5Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:45] S
[2014-05-11 02:11:45] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0 This is using the binaries from here: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer-binaries/tree/master/AntS1Nicehash website says ~60% reject rate. The only thing that comes to my mind is that this miner is modifying ntime. We don't allow modified ntimes, because we have no methods to evaluate whether modified ntime would be accepted by remote pool or not. There should be a way to force miner not to modify ntime; in fact, there is plenty of extranonce2 size so the ntime doesn't have to be modified. Guess that is the change compared to older miner. I've written to user "kano" here via a direct message to ask his thoughts ... NiceHashDev ... maybe you ought to reach out to him directly also if possible. I've got a lot of AntMiners I'd like to move to your pools if we can get this working ... :-) |
|
|
|
|
JHammer
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 11, 2014, 02:33:56 AM |
|
Under Pool stats, for some of my miners I am getting huge numbers of "Discards" What is Discards and why would some of my miners be reporting such a large number of them? Not sure what it means.. I am asking GAW to..
|
|
|
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
May 11, 2014, 04:47:03 AM |
|
Under Pool stats, for some of my miners I am getting huge numbers of "Discards" What is Discards and why would some of my miners be reporting such a large number of them? Not sure what it means.. I am asking GAW to..
Do you have expiry set to a low value? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
li_gangyi
|
|
May 11, 2014, 10:52:42 AM |
|
Looks like the gridseed capable cgminer binary has been pulled?
|
|
|
|
|
ajw7989
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 11, 2014, 01:30:09 PM |
|
Looks like the gridseed capable cgminer binary has been pulled?
It was pulled a day or two ago. I tried ot use that binary and it would not work. Just compile your own I did and I am getting amazing results. I do suffer from the idle bug with cgminer but little to no rejects so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
li_gangyi
|
|
May 11, 2014, 01:41:28 PM |
|
Built it on my raspberry pi. Seems to work pretty good thus far. Best results I've had yet with nicehash (I tried both bfgminer and hashra controlla previously which were unstable).
|
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
May 11, 2014, 03:06:51 PM |
|
Try to run it with some logging options and then paste content of file here.
Ok, it was a bit difficult getting log file as the default antminer S1 settings hides cgminers display. So had to kill process and run my own cgminer outputting to log file. Ran it for 5 mins. [2014-05-11 02:09:26] Started cgminer 4.3.2a
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] BitmainAntS1: detected ANT0
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() parse_rxstatus version(3) chain_num(2) fifo_space(
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() parse_rxstatus chain(0) asic_num=32 asic_status=ff
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() parse_rxstatus chain(1) asic_num=32 asic_status=ff
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() set_txconfig
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] ANT0: bitmain_initialize() succeeded
[2014-05-11 02:09:26] Probing for an alive pool
[2014-05-11 02:09:27] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 256
[2014-05-11 02:09:27] Network diff set to 1M
(5s):0.000 (1m):0.000 (5m):0.000 (15m):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:30] Stratu
[2014-05-11 02:09:30] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:09:30] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 1 old(0)
[2014-05-11 02:09:31] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart
[2014-05-11 02:09:31] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:09:31] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 2 old(1)
(5s):92.75G (1m):11.36G (5m):2.343G (15m):785.4M (avg):157.5Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:32] A
(5s):154.6G (1m):25.31G (5m):5.372G (15m):1.809G (avg):174.4Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:37] R
(5s):177.2G (1m):38.37G (5m):8.405G (15m):2.845G (avg):179.4Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:42] R
[2014-05-11 02:09:46] Accepted c7babcae Diff 328/256 ANT 0
(5s):181.2G (1m):50.02G (5m):11.32G (15m):3.852G (avg):180.7Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:09:52] R
(5s):173.3G (1m):59.68G (5m):13.97G (15m):4.782G (avg):178.6Gh/s ^M(5s):187.6G (1m):70.53G
(5s):188.6G (1m):79.59G (5m):19.73G (15m):6.827G (avg):181.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:03] R
[2014-05-11 02:10:04] Rejected 8ddd0063 Diff 462/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
[2014-05-11 02:10:04] Accepted e312c1a3 Diff 289/256 ANT 0
(5s):194.1G (1m):88.93G (5m):22.65G (15m):7.878G (avg):183.7Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:08] A
[2014-05-11 02:10:09] Accepted 93979222 Diff 444/256 ANT 0
[2014-05-11 02:10:09] Rejected db8e206e Diff 298/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
[2014-05-11 02:10:11] Rejected 99912a56 Diff 427/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
(5s):189.8G (1m):96.33G (5m):25.27G (15m):8.839G (avg):183.5Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:12] R
(5s):186.6G (1m):103.0G (5m):27.82G (15m):9.784G (avg):183.1Gh/s ^M(5s):188.2G (1m):110.1G
(5s):179.2G (1m):115.4G (5m):32.96G (15m):11.72G (avg):183.3Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:30] N
[2014-05-11 02:10:30] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-05-11 02:10:30] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:10:30] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 3 old(2)
(5s):179.8G (1m):120.6G (5m):35.39G (15m):12.65G (avg):183.1Gh/s ^M(5s):177.9G (1m):125.4G
(5s):178.1G (1m):129.9G (5m):40.19G (15m):14.52G (avg):183.0Gh/s ^M(5s):181.1G (1m):133.8G
[2014-05-11 02:10:47] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:10:48] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 4 old(3)
[2014-05-11 02:10:49] Rejected 7d43d949 Diff 523/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
(5s):173.5G (1m):136.6G (5m):44.58G (15m):16.28G (avg):181.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:10:52] R
(5s):179.9G (1m):140.2G (5m):46.82G (15m):17.19G (avg):181.8Gh/s ^M(5s):183.9G (1m):143.8G
[2014-05-11 02:11:17] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
[2014-05-11 02:11:17] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 5 old(4)
(5s):177.4G (1m):153.0G (5m):57.32G (15m):21.61G (avg):181.0Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:22] R
[2014-05-11 02:11:24] Rejected bbe1cbee Diff 349/256 ANT 0 (Share above target.)
(5s):180.8G (1m):155.3G (5m):59.37G (15m):22.49G (avg):181.0Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:29] R
(5s):176.6G (1m):157.0G (5m):61.31G (15m):23.34G (avg):180.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:36] S
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 512
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] Network diff set to 8G
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2014-05-11 02:11:37] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0
(5s):160.2G (1m):157.0G (5m):63.13G (15m):24.20G (avg):179.9Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:39] P
[2014-05-11 02:11:39] Rejected 9c7100ee Diff 419/256 ANT 0 (Job not found.)
[2014-05-11 02:11:41] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
[2014-05-11 02:11:41] Rejected 4285d4c5 Diff 985/256 ANT 0 (Job not found.)
[2014-05-11 02:11:42] BitmainAntS1: send task new block 6 old(5)
(5s):174.0G (1m):159.7G (5m):65.00G (15m):25.01G (avg):180.5Gh/s ^M [2014-05-11 02:11:45] S
[2014-05-11 02:11:45] ANT0: bitmain_flush_work() queued=0 This is using the binaries from here: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer-binaries/tree/master/AntS1Nicehash website says ~60% reject rate. The only thing that comes to my mind is that this miner is modifying ntime. We don't allow modified ntimes, because we have no methods to evaluate whether modified ntime would be accepted by remote pool or not. There should be a way to force miner not to modify ntime; in fact, there is plenty of extranonce2 size so the ntime doesn't have to be modified. Guess that is the change compared to older miner. I've written to user "kano" here via a direct message to ask his thoughts ... NiceHashDev ... maybe you ought to reach out to him directly also if possible. I've got a lot of AntMiners I'd like to move to your pools if we can get this working ... :-) Could you try your antminers now? I implemented ntime rolling support for the time job is alive - in seconds. |
|
|
|
|
Flep182
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1007
|
|
May 11, 2014, 04:25:11 PM |
|
Looks like the gridseed capable cgminer binary has been pulled?
It was pulled a day or two ago. I tried ot use that binary and it would not work. Just compile your own I did and I am getting amazing results. I do suffer from the idle bug with cgminer but little to no rejects so far. I've searched the forum for a bit, but is there a manual to compile the better cgminer version on rpi? I've got one running with hashra so I've switched that already but getting better results with the specialized cgminer would be even better  |
|
|
|
|
Humancell
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
May 11, 2014, 05:19:59 PM |
|
Could you try your antminers now? I implemented ntime rolling support for the time job is alive - in seconds.
So far the rejects are looking MUCH better ... still a high number of discards, bit I'm having trouble trying to figure out how minter12345 was able to get that log output ... :-/ BTW ... with an AntMiner S1 being 180-200GH/s, what would you recommend as the diff? I've been using the default of 512 ... |
|
|
|
|
minter12345
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
May 11, 2014, 07:28:58 PM |
|
Could you try your antminers now? I implemented ntime rolling support for the time job is alive - in seconds.
So far the rejects are looking MUCH better ... still a high number of discards, bit I'm having trouble trying to figure out how minter12345 was able to get that log output ... :-/ BTW ... with an AntMiner S1 being 180-200GH/s, what would you recommend as the diff? I've been using the default of 512 ... OMG it works! Ok for 5 mins of testing I got 38 Accepted and 2 Rejects. Your website says 6% reject rate. MUCH better than before. Humancell, Ignore the discards figure on the antminer page, it doesnt represent actual discards. I have same high figures on other sites too. But on the actual server side its all ok. |
Free coins every day: QoinPro Including Bitcoins! |
|
|
Humancell
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
May 11, 2014, 09:13:44 PM |
|
Could you try your antminers now? I implemented ntime rolling support for the time job is alive - in seconds.
So far the rejects are looking MUCH better ... still a high number of discards, bit I'm having trouble trying to figure out how minter12345 was able to get that log output ... :-/ BTW ... with an AntMiner S1 being 180-200GH/s, what would you recommend as the diff? I've been using the default of 512 ... OMG it works! Ok for 5 mins of testing I got 38 Accepted and 2 Rejects. Your website says 6% reject rate. MUCH better than before. Humancell, Ignore the discards figure on the antminer page, it doesnt represent actual discards. I have same high figures on other sites too. But on the actual server side its all ok. minter12345 what exactly are you using now for your password/params? Are you using the default diff of 512? Or a "d=256"? I know you say to ignore the discards, but on the NiceHash status page for my address, I'm seeing a "Round accepted speed GH/s" of 66GH/sec! Not even close to normal ... ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
nicehashdev
|
|
May 11, 2014, 10:13:29 PM |
|
Could you try your antminers now? I implemented ntime rolling support for the time job is alive - in seconds.
So far the rejects are looking MUCH better ... still a high number of discards, bit I'm having trouble trying to figure out how minter12345 was able to get that log output ... :-/ BTW ... with an AntMiner S1 being 180-200GH/s, what would you recommend as the diff? I've been using the default of 512 ... OMG it works! Ok for 5 mins of testing I got 38 Accepted and 2 Rejects. Your website says 6% reject rate. MUCH better than before. Humancell, Ignore the discards figure on the antminer page, it doesnt represent actual discards. I have same high figures on other sites too. But on the actual server side its all ok. minter12345 what exactly are you using now for your password/params? Are you using the default diff of 512? Or a "d=256"? I know you say to ignore the discards, but on the NiceHash status page for my address, I'm seeing a "Round accepted speed GH/s" of 66GH/sec! Not even close to normal ... ?? Round speed is measured since the round started (top right tells you when). If you jumped in the middle of the round, then you will have low round speed. |
|
|
|
|
|
