|
MichaelBliss
|
 |
April 09, 2014, 04:40:57 PM |
|
I just upgraded to 0.91 since I was using 0.9. I've never input my password using 0.9 but I have with prior versions, is there any reason for me to start a new wallet and transfer funds? As I understand, my bitcoin wallet password should be secure if I haven't entered the password into the 0.9 client?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
PepitaJoe
Member
 Offline
Activity: 268
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2014, 05:44:01 PM |
|
Does ever mean in the 0.9.0 version, or at any point of time?
The payment protocol only exists in 0.9. My wallet is version 0.8.6 beta. Can I continue to use it? If I upgrade to 0.9.1 version I have to download all blockchain? |
|
|
|
|
|
wumpus
|
|
April 09, 2014, 05:48:04 PM |
|
My wallet is version 0.8.6 beta.
Can I continue to use it?
yes If I upgrade to 0.9.1 version I have to download all blockchain?
no I just upgraded to 0.91 since I was using 0.9. I've never input my password using 0.9 but I have with prior versions, is there any reason for me to start a new wallet and transfer funds? As I understand, my bitcoin wallet password should be secure if I haven't entered the password into the 0.9 client?
no, no reason to do that |
Bitcoin Core developer [PGP] Warning: For most, coin loss is a larger risk than coin theft. A disk can die any time. Regularly back up your wallet through File → Backup Wallet to an external storage or the (encrypted!) cloud. Use a separate offline wallet for storing larger amounts. |
|
|
l4p7
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:03:11 PM |
|
This applies to Multibit Bitcoin wallets? Multibit vs 0.5.17?
+1 Any update there? |
|
|
|
|
|
Rawted
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:04:56 PM |
|
I keep small amounts in my pc wallet for casual spending. I applied the 0.9.0->0.9.1 update and once done syncing, the client told me that my database was corrupt and wanted to reindex it. I allowed it to, and sometime during the sync, 1.3 BTC went from confirmed to unconfirmed and hasn't moved since (24 hours or so I'd guess). Any ideas/suggestions?  |
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:23:23 PM |
|
Thanks for the quick fix.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
|
wumpus
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:25:14 PM |
|
I keep small amounts in my pc wallet for casual spending. I applied the 0.9.0->0.9.1 update and once done syncing, the client told me that my database was corrupt and wanted to reindex it. I allowed it to, and sometime during the sync, 1.3 BTC went from confirmed to unconfirmed and hasn't moved since (24 hours or so I'd guess). Any ideas/suggestions?
It appears to me that you have a few unconfirmed transactions that hold up inputs. Have you perhaps set "spend unconfirmed change" in options to false (or passed -spendzeroconfchange=0)? |
Bitcoin Core developer [PGP] Warning: For most, coin loss is a larger risk than coin theft. A disk can die any time. Regularly back up your wallet through File → Backup Wallet to an external storage or the (encrypted!) cloud. Use a separate offline wallet for storing larger amounts. |
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
|
 |
April 09, 2014, 06:26:48 PM |
|
thanks for that fast action! very good.
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:32:38 PM |
|
I keep small amounts in my pc wallet for casual spending. I applied the 0.9.0->0.9.1 update and once done syncing, the client told me that my database was corrupt and wanted to reindex it. I allowed it to, and sometime during the sync, 1.3 BTC went from confirmed to unconfirmed and hasn't moved since (24 hours or so I'd guess). Any ideas/suggestions?
If you look in the transaction list do you see any tx which are unconfirmed? If so check another source (blockr.io or blockchain.info) to determine if the tx is indeed unconfirmed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rawted
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:40:54 PM |
|
I keep small amounts in my pc wallet for casual spending. I applied the 0.9.0->0.9.1 update and once done syncing, the client told me that my database was corrupt and wanted to reindex it. I allowed it to, and sometime during the sync, 1.3 BTC went from confirmed to unconfirmed and hasn't moved since (24 hours or so I'd guess). Any ideas/suggestions?
It appears to me that you have a few unconfirmed transactions that hold up inputs. Have you perhaps set "spend unconfirmed change" in options to false (or passed -spendzeroconfchange=0)? Nope. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rawted
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:42:16 PM |
|
I keep small amounts in my pc wallet for casual spending. I applied the 0.9.0->0.9.1 update and once done syncing, the client told me that my database was corrupt and wanted to reindex it. I allowed it to, and sometime during the sync, 1.3 BTC went from confirmed to unconfirmed and hasn't moved since (24 hours or so I'd guess). Any ideas/suggestions?
If you look in the transaction list do you see any tx which are unconfirmed? If so check another source (blockr.io or blockchain.info) to determine if the tx is indeed unconfirmed. No, but i just noticed that it reverted me to 0.8.6.... How is this possible? All tx before 7/30/2013 are gone, and those coins are still unconfirmed. I was at version 0.9.0 prior to updating..  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rawted
|
|
April 09, 2014, 06:57:42 PM |
|
Updated to 0.9.1 again, ran it, and now those coins are out of unconfirmed balance and listed as 'conflicted' in transaction log and I don't recognize the address they were sent to.  |
|
|
|
|
boumalo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1018
|
|
April 09, 2014, 07:06:00 PM |
|
I got the message "Corrupted block database detected.
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?" then when it was almost entirely rebuilt I got the message again and it is rebuilding again now-I updated to 0.9.1 between the rebuilt and it didn't change anytging; can someone help me explain?
|
|
|
|
|
dex1
|
|
April 09, 2014, 08:05:47 PM |
|
After having read this: Is there a quick guide to install this ? I have just switched from windows to Ubuntu, Help! I got 0.9.0 installed via PPA but the PPA is not updated yet ( + I would like to know how to do it without) I have :- Downloaded bitcoin-0.9.1-linux.tar.gzThen tar xvzf bitcoin-0.9.1-linux.tar.gz
This gives me a folder with bin + src but no ./configure. src has but that fails. Obviously I just don't get it  The downloaded bin directory contains a few executable files. Find the locations of those files already on your system and replace them with the new versions. Maybe they're in /usr/bin? ...and then this: If you are using the graphical version of 0.9.0 on any platform, you must update immediately. If you are using packages from your Linux distro (Ubuntu PPA included), 0.9.1 has no changes for you. Instead, you must upgrade to a fixed OpenSSL version. So if libssl1.0.0 has been updated then all is good and we can still use 0.9.0 ?  Just be sure it's updated to a fixed version. ...could someone tell me which one is correct please ? What's the way to follow in order to have it fixed when one has got Bitcoin Core 0.9.0 from Ubuntu PPA ? Plain English without discrepancies will be much appreciated. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
Geremia
|
|
April 09, 2014, 08:35:52 PM |
|
Why isn't 0.9.1 on SourceForge, and what is its checksum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnyj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
|
April 09, 2014, 08:48:20 PM |
|
Yes I think separate the core and wallet should be a good thing, but this might require some effort and time, modularization usually take years to achieve
|
|
|
|
|
brian123321
|
|
April 09, 2014, 10:32:04 PM |
|
Anyone have information on whether this affects multi bit or not?
|
Tips: 1PyqHAuUU54Bk53XFwGoYAGciovHtL7CEL
|
|
|
|
noobyonekenobi
|
|
April 09, 2014, 11:44:45 PM
Last edit: April 09, 2014, 11:57:43 PM by noobyonekenobi |
|
Anyone have information on whether this affects multi bit or not?
"@MultiBitOrg Does the OpenSSL bug affect Multibit?" "-@QuadraQ As MultiBit is installed on your machine you interact with it directly so no." https://twitter.com/MultiBitOrg |
PS4 Funds for my brother. Help me get it. Thanks!  BTC: 1MqhiNvDfSBRzFuXLkdvUfve4zavoFw2f8 UTC: UdGz8AS2tzTnf5qZ59uYbCRbVqEQJZrQC2 LTC: LTUMKwRAkqtvbyA5s8TeNHduvWk9t3DvkN WDC: WjMWs8GUAyJXXtPJRXQXzJ9yjkda1GBbYs |
|
|
thutrant
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 10, 2014, 12:05:54 AM |
|
Anyone have information on whether this affects multi bit or not?
"@MultiBitOrg Does the OpenSSL bug affect Multibit?" "-@QuadraQ As MultiBit is installed on your machine you interact with it directly so no." https://twitter.com/MultiBitOrgGood to know, thanks for posting! But it's always better to be safe than sorry. |
|
|
|
|
|
