Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 03:11:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin will never be surpassed by any fork  (Read 842 times)
giantdragon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 09, 2014, 02:21:49 PM
 #1

Besides the network effect, there are another things that altcoin proponents ignore. Bitcoin has the strongest team of developers among all cryptocurrencies, as well as security vulnerabilities being fixed at first on Bitcoin (Litecoin/Peercoin/Dogecoin/etc will receive them much later). Recent OpenSSL issue is good example: Bitcoin is already fixed, Litecoin and others still vulnerable.

Forks can offer some nice features, but when it comes to the security (and a chance to lose all your coins due to unfixed bug), large investors will make appropriate conclusions IMHO.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 03:02:21 PM
 #2

Network effect is fairly ambiguous.  It can be taken to encompass several factors, and discriminating between them adds clarity.

1) Social network effect.

Recognition and understanding is a precondition for adoption.

2) Supply chain network effect.

Businesses can't operate in a numeraire unless their supply chain is available in that currency.

3) Protocol network effect.

The worlds most powerful supercomputer network protects bitcoin from attack. 



Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
devphp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 260


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 04:08:29 PM
 #3

Besides the network effect, there are another things that altcoin proponents ignore. Bitcoin has the strongest team of developers among all cryptocurrencies, as well as security vulnerabilities being fixed at first on Bitcoin (Litecoin/Peercoin/Dogecoin/etc will receive them much later). Recent OpenSSL issue is good example: Bitcoin is already fixed, Litecoin and others still vulnerable.

Forks can offer some nice features, but when it comes to the security (and a chance to lose all your coins due to unfixed bug), large investors will make appropriate conclusions IMHO.

It's interesting that NXT is not affected by this recent OpenSSL issue, because it runs on Java. At least that's what developers claim. Oh well, it's not a fork after all, but I just thought I should mention.
kooke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


Bitcoin super-duper-mega-ultra-hyper-node


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 11:22:48 PM
 #4

It may never be surpassed by a fork, but future crypto-currencies that will compete with Bitcoin probably won't be forked.

Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
April 09, 2014, 11:50:24 PM
 #5

Still don't see how bitcoin could be meaningfully improved. Is there a coin that is a better store of value? One that's more secure? One with faster-than-internet transactions? Something that is better for investment? One that is better in all categories overall?

So many coins, so few with any foundational value.

Look inside yourself, and you will see that you are the bubble.
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
April 09, 2014, 11:51:34 PM
 #6

Besides the network effect, there are another things that altcoin proponents ignore. Bitcoin has the strongest team of developers among all cryptocurrencies, as well as security vulnerabilities being fixed at first on Bitcoin (Litecoin/Peercoin/Dogecoin/etc will receive them much later). Recent OpenSSL issue is good example: Bitcoin is already fixed, Litecoin and others still vulnerable.

Forks can offer some nice features, but when it comes to the security (and a chance to lose all your coins due to unfixed bug), large investors will make appropriate conclusions IMHO.

I agree there is always strength in numbers and having the most developers working on your project

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
pa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528
Merit: 501


View Profile
April 10, 2014, 01:49:28 AM
 #7

Adam Back and George Maxwell have invented a new way to peg altcoins to the Bitcoin blockchain: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/22m063/blockchain_20_let_a_thousand_chains_blossom/

I'm no longer worried about Bitcoin being surpassed by an alt anytime soon.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
April 10, 2014, 01:59:45 AM
 #8

Adam Back and George Maxwell have invented a new way to peg altcoins to the Bitcoin blockchain: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/22m063/blockchain_20_let_a_thousand_chains_blossom/

I'm no longer worried about Bitcoin being surpassed by an alt anytime soon.
Question. Why do we need or want thousands of coins.

Look inside yourself, and you will see that you are the bubble.
iluvpie60
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 10, 2014, 02:28:47 AM
 #9

Network effect is fairly ambiguous.  It can be taken to encompass several factors, and discriminating between them adds clarity.

1) Social network effect.

Recognition and understanding is a precondition for adoption.

2) Supply chain network effect.

Businesses can't operate in a numeraire unless their supply chain is available in that currency.

3) Protocol network effect.

The worlds most powerful supercomputer network protects bitcoin from attack. 




Just like Myspace, AOL, Purevolume, and countless other before it eh?

Facebook and Twitter say hi.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!