|
Sundoor (OP)
|
 |
April 15, 2014, 12:06:13 AM |
|
America’s default on its debt is inevitable to day. If Russia is occupying part of Ukraine America could support Europe as it was in the past (World War 2) so take world domination and raise the economy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
April 15, 2014, 10:10:18 AM |
|
If you are asking if WWIII will save US dollar. No, it won't, there'll be no dollar in the current form to save. All debt (or bets) are off. However, the US analysts seem to think the opposite, so they push hard for a war by any means possible and are infuriated by Russia failing to react and actually do the damned invading.  |
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
|
|
April 15, 2014, 10:15:58 AM |
|
Criminals and psychopaths have turned the "land of the free" into lalaland, at the expense of the Americans and foreigners.
Sooner or later, miscalculation will happen, someone fires the first nuke and then yes, WW3. That 3 means the 3 hours it will take to turn the Earth into a replica of Venus.
|
|
|
|
gigEls
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
April 15, 2014, 01:13:04 PM |
|
Are you asking if US dollar is safe in case of WW3? I honestly don't think there is anything that could save USD and people's trust in it.. Just too much printing and the consequences have to be realized at some point.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217
|
|
April 15, 2014, 02:05:51 PM |
|
In case of a WW3, the economy of all the participants will collapse. However, those who stay neutral (China, India.etc) will gain immensely from it. But that said, I don't think that there will be any human life left in this planet after the WW3. Putin is very likely to use nuclear weapons, and the Russian ICBMs can't be stopped by any of the current missile shields.
|
|
|
|
|
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
|
|
April 15, 2014, 02:16:27 PM |
|
Either due to direct impact, radiation or nuclear winter, there will not be anyone left to spend the "saved" US dollar
|
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 15, 2014, 07:27:11 PM |
|
In case of a WW3, the economy of all the participants will collapse. However, those who stay neutral (China, India.etc) will gain immensely from it. But that said, I don't think that there will be any human life left in this planet after the WW3. Putin is very likely to use nuclear weapons, and the Russian ICBMs can't be stopped by any of the current missile shields.
I don't think any of the nations will dare to use nuclear weapons.. |
|
|
|
RobFordWotWot
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
time
|
|
April 15, 2014, 07:29:03 PM |
|
In case of a WW3, the economy of all the participants will collapse. However, those who stay neutral (China, India.etc) will gain immensely from it. But that said, I don't think that there will be any human life left in this planet after the WW3. Putin is very likely to use nuclear weapons, and the Russian ICBMs can't be stopped by any of the current missile shields.
I don't think any of the nations will dare to use nuclear weapons.. More than once after they start the war. |
Horses in midstream.
|
|
|
|
Kiki112
|
|
April 15, 2014, 07:34:42 PM |
|
In case of a WW3, the economy of all the participants will collapse. However, those who stay neutral (China, India.etc) will gain immensely from it. But that said, I don't think that there will be any human life left in this planet after the WW3. Putin is very likely to use nuclear weapons, and the Russian ICBMs can't be stopped by any of the current missile shields.
I don't think any of the nations will dare to use nuclear weapons.. More than once after they start the war. 0 times they know when they throw the first bomb the other nation will respond |
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217
|
|
April 16, 2014, 02:07:09 AM |
|
they know when they throw the first bomb the other nation will respond
Suppose that Putin and Obama launches the WW3, and after sometime Putin is assured that he is going to lose the war. If such a situation arises, Putin is more than likely to use the nukes, not only against the US but against the EU as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
Light
|
|
April 16, 2014, 02:20:37 AM |
|
Suppose that Putin and Obama launches the WW3, and after sometime Putin is assured that he is going to lose the war. If such a situation arises, Putin is more than likely to use the nukes, not only against the US but against the EU as well.
Basically, with WW3 we have MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction so I don't think we're going to have to worry much about the value of the USD given that there'll probably be little human life remaining after the use of nukes. |
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217
|
|
April 16, 2014, 10:50:15 AM |
|
i think gold (gold bar) become best investment when war is begin
economic crisis, stock market and bonds will crash, money (fiat) will be inflationary.
Why gold bars? Why not Bitcoins? Personally, I believe that anything which is guarded against inflation (such as Bullion and Crypto) can be considered as safe in the likely scenario of WW3. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nik1ab
|
|
April 16, 2014, 11:13:21 AM |
|
i think gold (gold bar) become best investment when war is begin
economic crisis, stock market and bonds will crash, money (fiat) will be inflationary.
Why gold bars? Why not Bitcoins? Personally, I believe that anything which is guarded against inflation (such as Bullion and Crypto) can be considered as safe in the likely scenario of WW3. Bitcoin is just another currency and therefore actually worthless. Gold is a physical thing. |
No signature ad here, because their conditions have become annoying.
|
|
|
|
counter
|
|
April 16, 2014, 11:21:58 PM |
|
In case of a WW3, the economy of all the participants will collapse. However, those who stay neutral (China, India.etc) will gain immensely from it. But that said, I don't think that there will be any human life left in this planet after the WW3. Putin is very likely to use nuclear weapons, and the Russian ICBMs can't be stopped by any of the current missile shields.
I think whoever fires the first nuke will find themselves on the wrong side of history and the tied end of a rope. People are more aware of the issues around the world more then ever before so expect major backlash from the people of the world. |
|
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
April 16, 2014, 11:30:25 PM |
|
If you are asking if WWIII will save US dollar. No, it won't, there'll be no dollar in the current form to save. All debt (or bets) are off. However, the US analysts seem to think the opposite, so they push hard for a war by any means possible and are infuriated by Russia failing to react and actually do the damned invading. Russia is just like yah we'll let you blow yourselves up comrade we already have Cosmonauts and Super Awesome Soyuz Capsule we don't need your American Kultura |
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
|
supernovax
|
|
April 17, 2014, 04:23:47 AM |
|
World war III = Nuclear, Biological apocalypse = Good bye world see you in heaven
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217
|
|
April 17, 2014, 05:40:24 AM |
|
I think whoever fires the first nuke will find themselves on the wrong side of history and the tied end of a rope. People are more aware of the issues around the world more then ever before so expect major backlash from the people of the world.
I disagree. During the WW2, when Japan was preparing to surrender, the US nuked them. Not once, but twice. It resulted in the death of close to 300,000 people, almost all of them civilians. There was no need for a nuclear attack back then. Did the USA faced any backlash for it? No. Did they ever gave any compensation? No. So your arguments are wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
counter
|
|
April 17, 2014, 08:53:53 AM |
|
I think you over looked the part where I said that in today's world this type of action would not fly. I tried to make that clear but at somepoint you over looked that part of my post or chose to disregard it? Either way I stand my my previous statement as I see no valid points you made in your post for me to do otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
April 17, 2014, 11:10:06 AM |
|
I think you over looked the part where I said that in today's world this type of action would not fly.
It might fly, if it has enough sugar-coating by the Mass Media Corporation. We already start seeing what happened in Yugoslavia back then, and as time go by, more info will leak and coalesce into a not so attractive picture. The same goes for Iraq, Afghanistan (both Soviet and American stay there), Libya. Yet, there was no backlash at the moment that counted the most - when atrocities happened. I remember during the Invasion of Yugoslavia, there were a lot of posters in public transportation in Norway from Loesje, condemning the war, with slogans of the type "Weher are the NATO cheerleaders?". But people gazed at them indifferently, bare acknowledging their existence. |
“Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”
“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided.”
“It is important to fight and fight again, and keep fighting, for only then can evil be kept at bay, though never quite eradicated.”
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217
|
|
April 17, 2014, 11:22:13 AM |
|
I think you over looked the part where I said that in today's world this type of action would not fly. I tried to make that clear but at somepoint you over looked that part of my post or chose to disregard it? Either way I stand my my previous statement as I see no valid points you made in your post for me to do otherwise.
Hmm.... Nothing has changed between the WW2 and now, as far as brainwashing is concerned. If people could justify the invasion of Iraq and the bombing of Serbia, then they could justify another nuclear attack as well. There will be no backlash. |
|
|
|
|
|
