chainz.cryptoID.info - Alternative Blockchain Explorers

[fairglu]

Granite explorer updated as well.

Support for anonymity features is in progress, leading the effort is ShadowCash explorer (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sdc/).

There may still be some bugs remaining regarding balances and amounts for blocks with ring signatures.
Hopefully other explorers will not be affected, but one never knows!

[chrysophylax]

Granite explorer updated as well.

Support for anonymity features is in progress, leading the effort is ShadowCash explorer (https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sdc/).

There may still be some bugs remaining regarding balances and amounts for blocks with ring signatures.
Hopefully other explorers will not be affected, but one never knows!

much appreciated for granite daemon update ...

anon features? ...

having a look ...

#crysx

[chrysophylax]

hi fairglu ...

drz2 has been updated now ...

daemon compile and just replace should suffice - if you dont mind please mate ...

official drz2 ( drz old on cryptoid ) - https://github.com/DroidzDevTeam/Droidz-V2 ...

let me know when you have done this - and what the node ip is also - to kickstart the testnode for my internal system ...

your help has been invaluable ...

tanx again ...

#crysx

[fairglu]

drz2 has been updated now ...

Updated

[chrysophylax]

drz2 has been updated now ...

Updated

much appreciated fairglu ... always the efficient ...

when you have a moment - i would like to discuss something of importance also ...

could you add me on skype please? ... chrysophylax69 - adelaide ...

or just pm ...

much appreciated ...

#crysx

[crypto4jan]

EnergyCoin has new wallet with fork:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1028941.msg13983417#msg13983417

More details information about the fork schedule:
- v1.5 now has a new network protocol version 70003
- To give enough time for users to update the software, v1.5 will accept connecting to peers with both new and old protocol versions until March 23, 2016.
- After March 23, new software will stop accepting peers with old protocol version. This will ensure only new software will proceed to the new fork.
- After that, fork will actually occur at block height 2100000, and then the network will also stop accepting PoW blocks.

Some more changes that will be noticeable by normal users:
- new command on console:- sendsplit (allow users to split into multiple outputs easily when sending coins). For example, if users want to send 1000 x 1000 coins to address eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
The command should be:

sendsplit eXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX '{"count":1000,"amount":1000}'

- getmininginfo command now contains staking-related information, including PoS weight and estimated time for reward.

[Tsquared]

Hello fairglu, thanks for providing this great service!

Hoping to get a few updates on https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgc/



Price is pegged to Cryptsy. Can this be changed to pull current price from Bittrex?

Website is now http://digitalcoin.org

BCT ANN is now https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1127380.0

Finally, twitter should be changed to @DigitalcoinORG



Thanks for supporting Digitalcoin!

TT

[fairglu]

Hoping to get a few updates on https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgc/

All updated!

[Tsquared]

Hoping to get a few updates on https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dgc/

All updated!

Thanks so much!

We love CryptoID!

TT

[elbandi]

Can you somehow filter/split the pow and pos block from difficulty chart?

eg: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/#@diff

It's hard to read the trends, etc. (pow diff is 40, pos diff is 0.06)

[Investing123]

Could you please change the name of "Blitz Coin" to "Blitzcoin"?
Thank you!

[Tsquared]

Can you somehow filter/split the pow and pos block from difficulty chart?

eg: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dmd/#@diff

It's hard to read the trends, etc. (pow diff is 40, pos diff is 0.06)

Been wanting to ask for something similar.

DGC has three algorithms, and we would love to see a column that shows which algorithm solved each block.

Would really appreciate it if this could be added.

TT

[Limx Dev]

Hello,

this is a nice Explorer.

Can you add BitSend?

https://github.com/LIMXTEC/BitSend

https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitsend/files/

Explorer
http://cryptoguru.tk/index.php?Currency=BSD
http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=BSD

Best Regards Christian

P.S. We pay 50 BSD per week for your service. (Donation)

[fairglu]

Hi.
Check out received for this address:


https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bitb/address.dws?2T2FBQ46L9UUx1CZ5r3DRBoW4FhNHaNwPt.htm


And when i send API command:


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/bitb/api.dws?q=getreceivedbyaddress&a=2T2FBQ46L9UUx1CZ5r3DRBoW4FhNHaNwPt


I get two different values. Help please?

The difference comes from the stake transaction: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bitb/tx.dws?1461035.htm

The low-level, total amount of vout that went to that address is 505289 (what getreceivedbyaddress API returns)

However in the address page, the stake transaction is considered separately so as not to inflate values disproportionately for staking address (which basically send to themselves), and the Received field thus excludes stake transactions, which in the case of that address is 8197 (in two outputs of 4097.3 coins), hence the value of 497024 on the address page, which is 505289-8197.

Similarly, on the address page, the amount sent excludes stake transactions for the same reason.

The balance of stake transaction on the address page is listed separately, I have added a small information icon with a popover listing the total staked amounts.

[hicaribou]

I really like your PeerCoin Blockchain Explorer:  https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ppc/

Unfortunately, the blockchain seems to be in the wrong chain which is caused by a Peerunity bug. Could you please update to Peercoin v0.5.3 or Peerunity v0.2.1.   The blockchain needs to be re-downloaded.

The download link:
https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/releases/tag/v0.2.1

For more details, please visit:
https://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=4544.0

Thank you very much!

P.S: This explorer is in the correct chain: https://coinplorer.com/PPC

[coins101]

please consider hosting VTR:

block explorer has moved to here: http://cryptoguru.tk/index.php?Currency=VTR

i paid the 0.01btc for a month of premium so we can all see the wallet list and the like

[Dekker3D]

Anybody here can show us some example of those commands that use the api keys?

[mastertrader777]

Greetings,

Sorry about letting MTR BlockExplorer go offline.

Things have been a uphill battle at MTR / ToshiDesk HQ.

Can we get MTR BlockExplorer back online?

Would love to begin using your service again.

Everyone keeps asking for it.

Thanks,

MasterTrader777

[KUBOSCOIN]

Hi.
Check out received for this address:


https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bitb/address.dws?2T2FBQ46L9UUx1CZ5r3DRBoW4FhNHaNwPt.htm


And when i send API command:


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/bitb/api.dws?q=getreceivedbyaddress&a=2T2FBQ46L9UUx1CZ5r3DRBoW4FhNHaNwPt


I get two different values. Help please?

The difference comes from the stake transaction: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bitb/tx.dws?1461035.htm

The low-level, total amount of vout that went to that address is 505289 (what getreceivedbyaddress API returns)

However in the address page, the stake transaction is considered separately so as not to inflate values disproportionately for staking address (which basically send to themselves), and the Received field thus excludes stake transactions, which in the case of that address is 8197 (in two outputs of 4097.3 coins), hence the value of 497024 on the address page, which is 505289-8197.

Similarly, on the address page, the amount sent excludes stake transactions for the same reason.

The balance of stake transaction on the address page is listed separately, I have added a small information icon with a popover listing the total staked amounts.

i was pm msg for add our kuboscoin to your block explorer i will pay bounty for that. thanks for support 

[SPB667]

Hi dev! How looks a direct link to Raw Block in general case?