BTConomist (OP)
|
|
January 09, 2012, 06:25:26 PM |
|
Is it technologically possible to swim in BTC?
|
Bitcoins are earned, not traded! If you plan on hoarding BTC, you're on my target list. (And yes, it is possible to swim in BTC.) Don't give me that Bull... I'm one of those honey eating Bears that the bees hope to never meet again... Viva la BTC!!!
|
|
|
pazor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 09, 2012, 06:26:01 PM |
|
virtual swimming
|
treuhand-Dienst gewünscht? - frag per PM an BTC 174X17nR7vEQBQo4GXKRGMGaTmB49Gf1yT
|
|
|
InstaGx
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 09, 2012, 06:38:53 PM |
|
Maybe with one of those fancy transaction scripts I keep hearing about.
|
Buy High - Sell Low
|
|
|
SgtSpike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
|
|
January 09, 2012, 06:48:51 PM |
|
Sure. Just send a Satoshi each to millions of private keys, then start printing the private keys, and eventually you'll have enough printouts to swim in.
|
|
|
|
jim618
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1066
|
|
January 09, 2012, 06:54:46 PM Last edit: January 09, 2012, 07:10:34 PM by jim618 |
|
If you define 'swimming' as controlled motion through a fluid then there would be two main aspects to bitcoin swimming:
1) Buoyancy control i.e making sure you did not sink (nor rise the surface too quickly - you do not want to suffer the excruciatingly painful bitcoin bends) 2) Propulsion - applying force to the fluid that you are immersed in so as to move in a controlled manner.
Clearly the fluid we are immersed in is bitcoin. I presume it is some sort of phase space of dimensionality equal to the address space.
For buoyancy control I suggest experimenting with sending and receiving small amounts to a fixed address (which we will henceforth label the 'swimmer'). I hypothesize that a transaction with a large number of inputs will 'weigh the swimmer down' i.e decrease buoyancy and that a send with lots of outputs will raise the swimmer up as the swimmer's balance is decreased.
Of course 'up' and 'down' in bitcoin address space may be difficult to ascertain - perhaps it is related to some sort of eigenvector of some important characteristic of the space, as yet unknown. A bitcoin analogue for 'gravity' if you like. Clearly the fundamental forces in bitcoin space need detailed research.
As to propulsion - we need to find the equivalent of momentum transfer. Clearly the size of a transaction relates to this. A large transaction clearly would give more oomph than a single Satoshi. Care must also be taken to manage the change of the transaction to ensure the bitcoin backwash does not nullify any initial impulse.
You also have to take into account Brownian Satoshi motion caused by teeny weeny transactions that occur 'near' to you in Bitcoin space which basically bobble you about.
Synchronised bitcoin swimming I postulate would involve a flurry of mutual transactions carefully crafted to combine just the right amount of exogenous inputs and outputs of the right size and quantity, combined with mutual spends between the swimmers so that the correct flocking behaviour is observed.
It sounds so complicated to do deftly that synchronised bitcoin swimming really should be an Olympic sport.
|
|
|
|
|
BadBitcoin (James Sutton)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 452
Merit: 252
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:10:31 PM |
|
If you define 'swimming' as controlled motion through a fluid then there would be two main aspects to bitcoin swimming:
1) Buoyancy control i.e making sure you did not sink (nor rise the surface too quickly - you do not want to suffer the excruciatingly painful bitcoin bends) 2) Propulsion - applying force to the fluid that you are immersed in so as to move in a controlled manner.
Clearly the fluid we are immersed in is bitcoin. I presume it is some sort of phase space of dimensionality equal to the address space.
For buoyancy control I suggest experimenting with sending and receiving small amounts to a fixed address (which we will henceforth label the 'swimmer'). I hypothesize that a transaction with a large number of inputs will 'weigh the swimmer down' i.e decrease buoyancy and that a send with lots of outputs will raise the swimmer up as the swimmer's balance is decreased.
Of course 'up' and 'down' in bitcoin address space may be difficult to ascertain - perhaps it is related to some sort of eigenvector of some important characteristic of the space, as yet unknown. A bitcoin analogue for 'gravity' if you like. Clearly the fundamental forces in bitcoin space need detailed research.
As to propulsion - we need to find the equivalent of momentum transfer. Clearly the size of a transaction relates to this. A large transaction clearly would give more oomph than a single Satoshi. Care must also be taken to manage the change of the transaction to ensure the bitcoin backwash does not nullify any initial impulse.
You also have to take into account Brownian Satoshi motion caused by teeny weeny transactions that occur 'near' to you in Bitcoin space which basically bobble you about.
Synchronised bitcoin swimming I postulate would involve a flurry of mutual transactions carefully crafted to combine just the right amount of exogenous inputs and outputs of the right size and quantity, combined with mutual spends between the swimmers so that the correct flocking behaviour is observed.
It sounds so complicated to do deftly that synchronised bitcoin swimming really should be an Olympic sport.
that is one of the most amazing posts I've ever read on this forum, you made me laugh out loud and my co-workers wondered what was funny. 10/10
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:14:29 PM |
|
Get a bunch of Cascius coins in a large tower. Create a diving board and dive in.
|
First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders Of course we accept bitcoin.
|
|
|
threeip
|
|
June 06, 2013, 05:16:09 PM |
|
Get a bunch of Cascius coins in a large tower. Create a diving board and dive in.
|
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
June 06, 2013, 06:25:56 PM |
|
As to propulsion - we need to find the equivalent of momentum transfer. Clearly the size of a transaction relates to this. A large transaction clearly would give more oomph than a single Satoshi. Care must also be taken to manage the change of the transaction to ensure the bitcoin backwash does not nullify any initial impulse.
Change, jim618, is what gives you that momentum transfer since it goes backwards and so it propels the amount transferred. If you send one satoshi from an address that contains ten bitcoins it will go out with a lower force than a similar satoshi sent from an address that contains ten thousand bitcoins spiccioli
|
|
|
|
edd
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 07, 2013, 12:52:27 AM |
|
Sure. Just send a Satoshi each to millions of private keys, then start printing the private keys, and eventually you'll have enough printouts to swim in.
Alternatively, one could print out the blockchain and go swimming in Bitcoin vs. swimming in bitcoins. Cheaper, too.
|
Still around.
|
|
|
TippingPoint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 905
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 07, 2013, 02:01:54 AM |
|
It is more frequently referred to as rolling in dough.
|
|
|
|
No 1
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Ad Infinitum Et Ultra
|
|
June 07, 2013, 02:05:37 AM |
|
anything is possible bud
|
12wqXQuExLnWoWWQy7j35hzBEW91bUz1YS LcbBQ5oXtTjyKK4V8iaDqgUAAtahv9nsHR
|
|
|
datafish
Donator
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 100
Swimming in a sea of data
|
|
June 07, 2013, 03:20:42 AM |
|
I swim in bitcoins every day!
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
June 07, 2013, 03:23:20 AM |
|
idk about you guys but this is precisely the reason why i dont own any bitcoins. i chose to go with silver instead because i can swim in it.
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
June 07, 2013, 03:43:38 AM Last edit: June 07, 2013, 07:21:55 AM by freedomno1 |
|
Time to build a device so we can enter the internet and swim in our bitcoin wealth Then people will complain get off my blockchain xd
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
ravenx13
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
June 07, 2013, 07:01:12 AM |
|
+1
|
|
|
|
Abdussamad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1579
|
|
June 07, 2013, 07:21:12 AM |
|
It should be fairly simple to swim in bitcoin. Like everything digital it is just a series of 1s and 0s.
So what you do is feed the blockchain to a computer that controls a water pipe that empties into a swimming pool. The computer releases some water every time it encounters a 1 and air every time it sees a 0. Eventually you'd get a pool full of bubbling bitcoins!
|
|
|
|
arklan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
|
|
June 07, 2013, 11:07:25 AM |
|
It should be fairly simple to swim in bitcoin. Like everything digital it is just a series of 1s and 0s.
So what you do is feed the blockchain to a computer that controls a water pipe that empties into a swimming pool. The computer releases some water every time it encounters a 1 and air every time it sees a 0. Eventually you'd get a pool full of bubbling bitcoins!
hot tub!
|
i don't post much, but this space for rent.
|
|
|
patricktim
|
|
June 07, 2013, 01:35:11 PM |
|
Is it technologically possible to swim in BTC?
physical swimming in btc is not possible.
|
|
|
|
|